下面是我创建的类，用来理解Douglas Crockford在他的网站Private Members in JavaScript中的建议

function Employee(id, name) { //Constructor
    //Public member variables
    this.id = id;
    this.name = name;
    //Private member variables
    var fName;
    var lName;
    var that = this;
    //By convention, we create a private variable 'that'. This is used to     
    //make the object available to the private methods. 

    //Private function
    function setFName(pfname) {
        fName = pfname;
        alert('setFName called');
    }
    //Privileged function
    this.setLName = function (plName, pfname) {
        lName = plName;  //Has access to private variables
        setFName(pfname); //Has access to private function
        alert('setLName called ' + this.id); //Has access to member variables
    }
    //Another privileged member has access to both member variables and private variables
    //Note access of this.dataOfBirth created by public member setDateOfBirth
    this.toString = function () {
        return 'toString called ' + this.id + ' ' + this.name + ' ' + fName + ' ' + lName + ' ' + this.dataOfBirth; 
    }
}
//Public function has access to member variable and can create on too but does not have access to private variable
Employee.prototype.setDateOfBirth = function (dob) {
    alert('setDateOfBirth called ' + this.id);
    this.dataOfBirth = dob;   //Creates new public member note this is accessed by toString
    //alert(fName); //Does not have access to private member
}
$(document).ready()
{
    var employee = new Employee(5, 'Shyam'); //Create a new object and initialize it with constructor
    employee.setLName('Bhaskar', 'Ram');  //Call privileged function
    employee.setDateOfBirth('1/1/2000');  //Call public function
    employee.id = 9;                     //Set up member value
    //employee.setFName('Ram');  //can not call Private Privileged method
    alert(employee.toString());  //See the changed object

}

模块模式在大多数情况下是正确的。但是如果您有数千个实例，类可以节省内存。如果需要考虑节省内存，并且您的对象包含少量私有数据，但有大量公共函数，那么您将希望所有公共函数都驻留在.prototype中以节省内存。

这是我想到的:

var MyClass = (function () {
    var secret = {}; // You can only getPriv() if you know this
    function MyClass() {
        var that = this, priv = {
            foo: 0 // ... and other private values
        };
        that.getPriv = function (proof) {
            return (proof === secret) && priv;
        };
    }
    MyClass.prototype.inc = function () {
        var priv = this.getPriv(secret);
        priv.foo += 1;
        return priv.foo;
    };
    return MyClass;
}());
var x = new MyClass();
x.inc(); // 1
x.inc(); // 2

对象priv包含私有属性。它可以通过公共函数getPriv()访问，但该函数返回false，除非您将secret传递给它，并且只有在主闭包中才知道。

这是我得出的结论:

需要一类糖代码，你可以在这里找到。还支持保护，继承，虚拟，静态的东西…

;( function class_Restaurant( namespace )
{
    'use strict';

    if( namespace[ "Restaurant" ] ) return    // protect against double inclusions

        namespace.Restaurant = Restaurant
    var Static               = TidBits.OoJs.setupClass( namespace, "Restaurant" )


    // constructor
    //
    function Restaurant()
    {
        this.toilets = 3

        this.Private( private_stuff )

        return this.Public( buy_food, use_restroom )
    }

    function private_stuff(){ console.log( "There are", this.toilets, "toilets available") }

    function buy_food     (){ return "food"        }
    function use_restroom (){ this.private_stuff() }

})( window )


var chinese = new Restaurant

console.log( chinese.buy_food()      );  // output: food
console.log( chinese.use_restroom()  );  // output: There are 3 toilets available
console.log( chinese.toilets         );  // output: undefined
console.log( chinese.private_stuff() );  // output: undefined

// and throws: TypeError: Object #<Restaurant> has no method 'private_stuff'

你可以像这样模拟私有方法:

function Restaurant() {
}

Restaurant.prototype = (function() {
    var private_stuff = function() {
        // Private code here
    };

    return {

        constructor:Restaurant,

        use_restroom:function() {
            private_stuff();
        }

    };
})();

var r = new Restaurant();

// This will work:
r.use_restroom();

// This will cause an error:
r.private_stuff();

更多关于此技术的信息，请访问:http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2008/04/natural-javascript-private-methods.html

模块模式的典范:揭示模块模式

一个非常健壮的模式的简洁的小扩展。

我知道这是一个老话题，但我试图找到一种方法来保持代码的“简单性”的可维护性的目的，并保持轻的内存负载。它有这样的模式。希望能有所帮助。

const PublicClass=function(priv,pub,ro){
    let _priv=new PrivateClass(priv,pub,ro);
    ['publicMethod'].forEach(k=>this[k]=(...args)=>_priv[k](...args));
    ['publicVar'].forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(this,k,{get:()=>_priv[k],set:v=>_priv[k]=v}));
    ['readOnlyVar'].forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(this,k,{get:()=>_priv[k]}));
};

class PrivateClass{
    constructor(priv,pub,ro){
        this.privateVar=priv;
        this.publicVar=pub;
        this.readOnlyVar=ro;
    }
    publicMethod(arg1,arg2){
        return this.privateMethod(arg1,arg2);
    }
    privateMethod(arg1,arg2){
        return arg1+''+arg2;
    }
}
// in node;
module.exports=PublicClass;
// in browser;
const PublicClass=(function(){
    // code here
    return PublicClass;
})();

同样的原则适用于老式浏览器:

var PublicClass=function(priv,pub,ro){
    var scope=this;
    var _priv=new PrivateClass(priv,pub,ro);
    ['publicMethod'].forEach(function(k){
        scope[k]=function(){return _priv[k].apply(_priv,arguments)};
    });
    ['publicVar'].forEach(function(k){
        Object.defineProperty(scope,k,{get:function(){return _priv[k]},set:function(v){_priv[k]=v}});
    });
    ['readOnlyVar'].forEach(function(k){
        Object.defineProperty(scope,k,{get:function(){return _priv[k]}});
    });
};

var PrivateClass=function(priv,pub,ro){
    this.privateVar=priv;
    this.publicVar=pub;
    this.readOnlyVar=ro;
};
PrivateClass.prototype.publicMethod=function(arg1,arg2){
    return this.privateMethod(arg1,arg2);
};
PrivateClass.prototype.privateMethod=function(arg1,arg2){
    return arg1+''+arg2;
};

为了减轻公共类的冗长和负载，将此模式应用于构造函数:

const AbstractPublicClass=function(instanciate,inherit){
    let _priv=instanciate();
    inherit.methods?.forEach(k=>this[k]=(...args)=>_priv[k](...args));
    inherit.vars?.forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(this,k,{get:()=>_priv[k],set:v=>_priv[k]=v}));
    inherit.readonly?.forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(this,k,{get:()=>_priv[k]}));
};

AbstractPublicClass.static=function(_pub,_priv,inherit){
    inherit.methods?.forEach(k=>_pub[k]=(...args)=>_priv[k](...args));
    inherit.vars?.forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(_pub,k,{get:()=>_priv[k],set:v=>_priv[k]=v}));
    inherit.readonly?.forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(_pub,k,{get:()=>_priv[k]}));
};

使用:

// PrivateClass ...
PrivateClass.staticVar='zog';
PrivateClass.staticMethod=function(){return 'hello '+this.staticVar;};


const PublicClass=function(priv,pub,ro){
    AbstractPublicClass.apply(this,[()=>new PrivateClass(priv,pub,ro),{
        methods:['publicMethod'],
        vars:['publicVar'],
        readonly:['readOnlyVar']
    }]);
};
AbstractPublicClass.static(PublicClass,PrivateClass,{
    methods:['staticMethod'],
    vars:['staticVar']
});

PS:这种方法的默认(大多数时候可以忽略不计)是，与完全公共相比，它可以占用很小的计算负载。但只要你不使用它与高度请求类应该是可以的。