要创建一个带有公共方法的JavaScript类，我可以这样做:
function Restaurant() {}
Restaurant.prototype.buy_food = function(){
// something here
}
Restaurant.prototype.use_restroom = function(){
// something here
}
这样，我类的用户就可以:
var restaurant = new Restaurant();
restaurant.buy_food();
restaurant.use_restroom();
如何创建一个私有方法，可以由buy_food和use_restroom方法调用，但不能由类的用户外部调用?
换句话说，我希望我的方法实现能够做到:
Restaurant.prototype.use_restroom = function() {
this.private_stuff();
}
但这是行不通的:
var r = new Restaurant();
r.private_stuff();
如何将private_stuff定义为私有方法，使两者都成立?
我读过Doug Crockford的文章几次，但它似乎不像“私有”方法可以被公共方法调用，而“特权”方法可以被外部调用。
以下是迄今为止我最喜欢的关于javascript中的私有/公共方法/成员和实例化:
这是文章:http://www.sefol.com/?p=1090
下面是一个例子:
var Person = (function () {
//Immediately returns an anonymous function which builds our modules
return function (name, location) {
alert("createPerson called with " + name);
var localPrivateVar = name;
var localPublicVar = "A public variable";
var localPublicFunction = function () {
alert("PUBLIC Func called, private var is :" + localPrivateVar)
};
var localPrivateFunction = function () {
alert("PRIVATE Func called ")
};
var setName = function (name) {
localPrivateVar = name;
}
return {
publicVar: localPublicVar,
location: location,
publicFunction: localPublicFunction,
setName: setName
}
}
})();
//Request a Person instance - should print "createPerson called with ben"
var x = Person("ben", "germany");
//Request a Person instance - should print "createPerson called with candide"
var y = Person("candide", "belgium");
//Prints "ben"
x.publicFunction();
//Prints "candide"
y.publicFunction();
//Now call a public function which sets the value of a private variable in the x instance
x.setName("Ben 2");
//Shouldn't have changed this : prints "candide"
y.publicFunction();
//Should have changed this : prints "Ben 2"
x.publicFunction();
JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/northkildonan/kopj3dt3/1/
一个丑陋但有效的解决方案:
function Class(cb) {
const self = {};
const constructor = (fn) => {
func = fn;
};
const addPrivate = (fnName, obj) => {
self[fnName] = obj;
}
const addPublic = (fnName, obj) => {
this[fnName] = obj;
self[fnName] = obj;
func.prototype[fnName] = obj;
}
cb(constructor, addPrivate, addPublic, self);
return func;
}
const test = new Class((constructor, private, public, self) => {
constructor(function (test) {
console.log(test)
});
public('test', 'yay');
private('qwe', 'nay');
private('no', () => {
return 'hello'
})
public('asd', () => {
return 'this is public'
})
public('hello', () => {
return self.qwe + self.no() + self.asd()
})
})
const asd = new test('qweqwe');
console.log(asd.hello());
既然每个人都在这里张贴自己的代码，我也要这样做…
我喜欢Crockford，因为他在Javascript中引入了真正的面向对象模式。但他也产生了一个新的误解，那个“那个”。
那么他为什么要用"that = this"呢?这和私人活动完全没有关系。它与内部函数有关!
因为根据Crockford的说法，这是有bug的代码:
Function Foo( ) {
this.bar = 0;
var foobar=function( ) {
alert(this.bar);
}
}
所以他建议这样做:
Function Foo( ) {
this.bar = 0;
that = this;
var foobar=function( ) {
alert(that.bar);
}
}
就像我说的，我很确定Crockford对这个和这个的解释是错误的(但他的代码肯定是正确的)。或者他只是在愚弄Javascript世界，知道谁在复制他的代码?我不知道……我不是浏览器极客
EDIT
啊，这就是问题所在:'var that = this;'在JavaScript中是什么意思?
所以Crockie的解释是错误的....但他的代码是正确的，所以他还是个好人。:))
