我想到了这个:编辑:实际上，有人已经链接到一个相同的解决方案。咄!

var Car = function() {
}

Car.prototype = (function() {
    var hotWire = function() {
        // Private code *with* access to public properties through 'this'
        alert( this.drive() ); // Alerts 'Vroom!'
    }

    return {
        steal: function() {
            hotWire.call( this ); // Call a private method
        },
        drive: function() {
            return 'Vroom!';
        }
    };
})();

var getAwayVechile = new Car();

hotWire(); // Not allowed
getAwayVechile.hotWire(); // Not allowed
getAwayVechile.steal(); // Alerts 'Vroom!'

老问题，但这是一个相当简单的任务，可以用核心JS正确解决…没有ES6的Class抽象。事实上，据我所知，类抽象甚至不能解决这个问题。

我们既可以使用老的构造函数，也可以使用Object.create()更好地完成这项工作。让我们先从构造函数开始。这本质上是一个与georgebrock的答案相似的解决方案，georgebrock的答案受到了批评，因为所有由Restaurant构造函数创建的餐厅都将具有相同的私有方法。我会努力克服这个限制。

function restaurantFactory(name,menu){ function Restaurant(name){ this.name = name; } function prototypeFactory(menu){ // This is a private function function calculateBill(item){ return menu[item] || 0; } // This is the prototype to be return { constructor: Restaurant , askBill : function(...items){ var cost = items.reduce((total,item) => total + calculateBill(item) ,0) return "Thank you for dining at " + this.name + ". Total is: " + cost + "\n" } , callWaiter : function(){ return "I have just called the waiter at " + this.name + "\n"; } } } Restaurant.prototype = prototypeFactory(menu); return new Restaurant(name,menu); } var menu = { water: 1 , coke : 2 , beer : 3 , beef : 15 , rice : 2 }, name = "Silver Scooop", rest = restaurantFactory(name,menu); console.log(rest.callWaiter()); console.log(rest.askBill("beer", "beef"));

现在显然我们不能从外部访问菜单，但我们可以很容易地重命名餐厅的name属性。

这也可以用object .create()来完成，在这种情况下，我们跳过构造函数，简单地像var rest = object .create(prototypeFactory(menu))那样做，然后像rest.name = name那样将name属性添加到rest对象。

一个丑陋但有效的解决方案:

function Class(cb) { const self = {}; const constructor = (fn) => { func = fn; }; const addPrivate = (fnName, obj) => { self[fnName] = obj; } const addPublic = (fnName, obj) => { this[fnName] = obj; self[fnName] = obj; func.prototype[fnName] = obj; } cb(constructor, addPrivate, addPublic, self); return func; } const test = new Class((constructor, private, public, self) => { constructor(function (test) { console.log(test) }); public('test', 'yay'); private('qwe', 'nay'); private('no', () => { return 'hello' }) public('asd', () => { return 'this is public' }) public('hello', () => { return self.qwe + self.no() + self.asd() }) }) const asd = new test('qweqwe'); console.log(asd.hello());

如果你想要所有的公共函数和私有函数，并让公共函数能够访问私有函数，可以这样布局一个对象的代码:

function MyObject(arg1, arg2, ...) {
  //constructor code using constructor arguments...
  //create/access public variables as 
  // this.var1 = foo;

  //private variables

  var v1;
  var v2;

  //private functions
  function privateOne() {
  }

  function privateTwon() {
  }

  //public functions

  MyObject.prototype.publicOne = function () {
  };

  MyObject.prototype.publicTwo = function () {
  };
}

模块模式的典范:揭示模块模式

一个非常健壮的模式的简洁的小扩展。

我知道这是一个老话题，但我试图找到一种方法来保持代码的“简单性”的可维护性的目的，并保持轻的内存负载。它有这样的模式。希望能有所帮助。

const PublicClass=function(priv,pub,ro){
    let _priv=new PrivateClass(priv,pub,ro);
    ['publicMethod'].forEach(k=>this[k]=(...args)=>_priv[k](...args));
    ['publicVar'].forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(this,k,{get:()=>_priv[k],set:v=>_priv[k]=v}));
    ['readOnlyVar'].forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(this,k,{get:()=>_priv[k]}));
};

class PrivateClass{
    constructor(priv,pub,ro){
        this.privateVar=priv;
        this.publicVar=pub;
        this.readOnlyVar=ro;
    }
    publicMethod(arg1,arg2){
        return this.privateMethod(arg1,arg2);
    }
    privateMethod(arg1,arg2){
        return arg1+''+arg2;
    }
}
// in node;
module.exports=PublicClass;
// in browser;
const PublicClass=(function(){
    // code here
    return PublicClass;
})();

同样的原则适用于老式浏览器:

var PublicClass=function(priv,pub,ro){
    var scope=this;
    var _priv=new PrivateClass(priv,pub,ro);
    ['publicMethod'].forEach(function(k){
        scope[k]=function(){return _priv[k].apply(_priv,arguments)};
    });
    ['publicVar'].forEach(function(k){
        Object.defineProperty(scope,k,{get:function(){return _priv[k]},set:function(v){_priv[k]=v}});
    });
    ['readOnlyVar'].forEach(function(k){
        Object.defineProperty(scope,k,{get:function(){return _priv[k]}});
    });
};

var PrivateClass=function(priv,pub,ro){
    this.privateVar=priv;
    this.publicVar=pub;
    this.readOnlyVar=ro;
};
PrivateClass.prototype.publicMethod=function(arg1,arg2){
    return this.privateMethod(arg1,arg2);
};
PrivateClass.prototype.privateMethod=function(arg1,arg2){
    return arg1+''+arg2;
};

为了减轻公共类的冗长和负载，将此模式应用于构造函数:

const AbstractPublicClass=function(instanciate,inherit){
    let _priv=instanciate();
    inherit.methods?.forEach(k=>this[k]=(...args)=>_priv[k](...args));
    inherit.vars?.forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(this,k,{get:()=>_priv[k],set:v=>_priv[k]=v}));
    inherit.readonly?.forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(this,k,{get:()=>_priv[k]}));
};

AbstractPublicClass.static=function(_pub,_priv,inherit){
    inherit.methods?.forEach(k=>_pub[k]=(...args)=>_priv[k](...args));
    inherit.vars?.forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(_pub,k,{get:()=>_priv[k],set:v=>_priv[k]=v}));
    inherit.readonly?.forEach(k=>Object.defineProperty(_pub,k,{get:()=>_priv[k]}));
};

使用:

// PrivateClass ...
PrivateClass.staticVar='zog';
PrivateClass.staticMethod=function(){return 'hello '+this.staticVar;};


const PublicClass=function(priv,pub,ro){
    AbstractPublicClass.apply(this,[()=>new PrivateClass(priv,pub,ro),{
        methods:['publicMethod'],
        vars:['publicVar'],
        readonly:['readOnlyVar']
    }]);
};
AbstractPublicClass.static(PublicClass,PrivateClass,{
    methods:['staticMethod'],
    vars:['staticVar']
});

PS:这种方法的默认(大多数时候可以忽略不计)是，与完全公共相比，它可以占用很小的计算负载。但只要你不使用它与高度请求类应该是可以的。