关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…
什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然
寻找这样的输出…
['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']
关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…
什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然
寻找这样的输出…
['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']
当前回答
我建议使用node-glob来完成这个任务。
var glob = require( 'glob' );
glob( 'dirname/**/*.js', function( err, files ) {
console.log( files );
});
其他回答
我喜欢上面chjj的答案,如果没有那个开始,我就无法创建我的并行循环版本。
var fs = require("fs");
var tree = function(dir, done) {
var results = {
"path": dir
,"children": []
};
fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
if (err) { return done(err); }
var pending = list.length;
if (!pending) { return done(null, results); }
list.forEach(function(file) {
fs.stat(dir + '/' + file, function(err, stat) {
if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
tree(dir + '/' + file, function(err, res) {
results.children.push(res);
if (!--pending){ done(null, results); }
});
} else {
results.children.push({"path": dir + "/" + file});
if (!--pending) { done(null, results); }
}
});
});
});
};
module.exports = tree;
我也创建了一个Gist。欢迎评论。我仍然在NodeJS领域起步,所以这是我希望学到更多的一种方式。
使用承诺(Q)以函数式风格解决此问题:
var fs = require('fs'),
fsPath = require('path'),
Q = require('q');
var walk = function (dir) {
return Q.ninvoke(fs, 'readdir', dir).then(function (files) {
return Q.all(files.map(function (file) {
file = fsPath.join(dir, file);
return Q.ninvoke(fs, 'lstat', file).then(function (stat) {
if (stat.isDirectory()) {
return walk(file);
} else {
return [file];
}
});
}));
}).then(function (files) {
return files.reduce(function (pre, cur) {
return pre.concat(cur);
});
});
};
它返回一个数组的promise,所以你可以这样使用它:
walk('/home/mypath').then(function (files) { console.log(files); });
There are basically two ways of accomplishing this. In an async environment you'll notice that there are two kinds of loops: serial and parallel. A serial loop waits for one iteration to complete before it moves onto the next iteration - this guarantees that every iteration of the loop completes in order. In a parallel loop, all the iterations are started at the same time, and one may complete before another, however, it is much faster than a serial loop. So in this case, it's probably better to use a parallel loop because it doesn't matter what order the walk completes in, just as long as it completes and returns the results (unless you want them in order).
一个平行循环看起来是这样的:
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
var results = [];
fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
if (err) return done(err);
var pending = list.length;
if (!pending) return done(null, results);
list.forEach(function(file) {
file = path.resolve(dir, file);
fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
walk(file, function(err, res) {
results = results.concat(res);
if (!--pending) done(null, results);
});
} else {
results.push(file);
if (!--pending) done(null, results);
}
});
});
});
};
一个串行循环看起来像这样:
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
var results = [];
fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
if (err) return done(err);
var i = 0;
(function next() {
var file = list[i++];
if (!file) return done(null, results);
file = path.resolve(dir, file);
fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
walk(file, function(err, res) {
results = results.concat(res);
next();
});
} else {
results.push(file);
next();
}
});
})();
});
};
并且在你的主目录中测试它(警告:如果你的主目录中有很多东西,结果列表将会非常大):
walk(process.env.HOME, function(err, results) {
if (err) throw err;
console.log(results);
});
编辑:改进的示例。
TypeScript中基于承诺的递归解决方案,使用Array.flat()处理嵌套返回。
import { resolve } from 'path'
import { Dirent } from 'fs'
import * as fs from 'fs'
function getFiles(root: string): Promise<string[]> {
return fs.promises
.readdir(root, { withFileTypes: true })
.then(dirents => {
const mapToPath = (r: string) => (dirent: Dirent): string => resolve(r, dirent.name)
const directoryPaths = dirents.filter(a => a.isDirectory()).map(mapToPath(root))
const filePaths = dirents.filter(a => a.isFile()).map(mapToPath(root))
return Promise.all<string>([
...directoryPaths.map(a => getFiles(a, include)).flat(),
...filePaths.map(a => Promise.resolve(a))
]).then(a => a.flat())
})
}
递归-readdir模块具有此功能。