关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…
什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然
寻找这样的输出…
['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']
关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…
什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然
寻找这样的输出…
['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']
当前回答
我建议使用node-glob来完成这个任务。
var glob = require( 'glob' );
glob( 'dirname/**/*.js', function( err, files ) {
console.log( files );
});
其他回答
香草ES6 +异步/等待+小和可读
我没有在这篇文章中找到我想要的答案;在不同的答案中有一些相似的元素,但我只想要一些简单易读的东西。
为了防止它在未来帮助到任何人(比如几个月后的我自己),这就是我最终使用的:
const { readdir } = require('fs/promises');
const { join } = require('path');
const readdirRecursive = async dir => {
const files = await readdir( dir, { withFileTypes: true } );
const paths = files.map( async file => {
const path = join( dir, file.name );
if ( file.isDirectory() ) return await readdirRecursive( path );
return path;
} );
return ( await Promise.all( paths ) ).flat( Infinity );
}
module.exports = {
readdirRecursive,
}
这就是我的答案。希望它能帮助到一些人。
我的重点是使搜索例程可以停在任何地方,对于找到的文件,告诉原始路径的相对深度。
var _fs = require('fs');
var _path = require('path');
var _defer = process.nextTick;
// next() will pop the first element from an array and return it, together with
// the recursive depth and the container array of the element. i.e. If the first
// element is an array, it'll be dug into recursively. But if the first element is
// an empty array, it'll be simply popped and ignored.
// e.g. If the original array is [1,[2],3], next() will return [1,0,[[2],3]], and
// the array becomes [[2],3]. If the array is [[[],[1,2],3],4], next() will return
// [1,2,[2]], and the array becomes [[[2],3],4].
// There is an infinity loop `while(true) {...}`, because I optimized the code to
// make it a non-recursive version.
var next = function(c) {
var a = c;
var n = 0;
while (true) {
if (a.length == 0) return null;
var x = a[0];
if (x.constructor == Array) {
if (x.length > 0) {
a = x;
++n;
} else {
a.shift();
a = c;
n = 0;
}
} else {
a.shift();
return [x, n, a];
}
}
}
// cb is the callback function, it have four arguments:
// 1) an error object if any exception happens;
// 2) a path name, may be a directory or a file;
// 3) a flag, `true` means directory, and `false` means file;
// 4) a zero-based number indicates the depth relative to the original path.
// cb should return a state value to tell whether the searching routine should
// continue: `true` means it should continue; `false` means it should stop here;
// but for a directory, there is a third state `null`, means it should do not
// dig into the directory and continue searching the next file.
var ls = function(path, cb) {
// use `_path.resolve()` to correctly handle '.' and '..'.
var c = [ _path.resolve(path) ];
var f = function() {
var p = next(c);
p && s(p);
};
var s = function(p) {
_fs.stat(p[0], function(err, ss) {
if (err) {
// use `_defer()` to turn a recursive call into a non-recursive call.
cb(err, p[0], null, p[1]) && _defer(f);
} else if (ss.isDirectory()) {
var y = cb(null, p[0], true, p[1]);
if (y) r(p);
else if (y == null) _defer(f);
} else {
cb(null, p[0], false, p[1]) && _defer(f);
}
});
};
var r = function(p) {
_fs.readdir(p[0], function(err, files) {
if (err) {
cb(err, p[0], true, p[1]) && _defer(f);
} else {
// not use `Array.prototype.map()` because we can make each change on site.
for (var i = 0; i < files.length; i++) {
files[i] = _path.join(p[0], files[i]);
}
p[2].unshift(files);
_defer(f);
}
});
}
_defer(f);
};
var printfile = function(err, file, isdir, n) {
if (err) {
console.log('--> ' + ('[' + n + '] ') + file + ': ' + err);
return true;
} else {
console.log('... ' + ('[' + n + '] ') + (isdir ? 'D' : 'F') + ' ' + file);
return true;
}
};
var path = process.argv[2];
ls(path, printfile);
这是另一个实现。上述解决方案都没有任何限制,因此如果您的目录结构很大,它们都会崩溃并最终耗尽资源。
var async = require('async');
var fs = require('fs');
var resolve = require('path').resolve;
var scan = function(path, concurrency, callback) {
var list = [];
var walker = async.queue(function(path, callback) {
fs.stat(path, function(err, stats) {
if (err) {
return callback(err);
} else {
if (stats.isDirectory()) {
fs.readdir(path, function(err, files) {
if (err) {
callback(err);
} else {
for (var i = 0; i < files.length; i++) {
walker.push(resolve(path, files[i]));
}
callback();
}
});
} else {
list.push(path);
callback();
}
}
});
}, concurrency);
walker.push(path);
walker.drain = function() {
callback(list);
}
};
使用50的并发工作得非常好,并且几乎和小型目录结构的简单实现一样快。
看看装载机 https://npmjs.org/package/loaddir
npm无处不在
loaddir = require('loaddir')
allJavascripts = []
loaddir({
path: __dirname + '/public/javascripts',
callback: function(){ allJavascripts.push(this.relativePath + this.baseName); }
})
如果还需要扩展名,可以使用fileName而不是baseName。
一个额外的好处是,它也会监视文件,并再次调用回调。有大量的配置选项使它非常灵活。
我只是在短时间内用加载器从红宝石重造了守卫宝石
使用node-dir可以生成您想要的输出
var dir = require('node-dir');
dir.files(__dirname, function(err, files) {
if (err) throw err;
console.log(files);
//we have an array of files now, so now we can iterate that array
files.forEach(function(path) {
action(null, path);
})
});