唯一的其他区别是类和结构的默认继承，不出意外，它们分别是私有和公共的。

类的成员默认为private, struct的成员默认为public。

例如，程序1编译失败，程序2运行正常。

// Program 1
#include <stdio.h>
 
class Test {
    int x; // x is private
};

int main()
{
  Test t;
  t.x = 20; // compiler error because x is private
  getchar();
  return 0;
}

// Program 2
#include <stdio.h>
 
struct Test {
    int x; // x is public
};

int main()
{
  Test t;
  t.x = 20; // works fine because x is public
  getchar();
  return 0;
}

从类/结构派生结构时，基类/结构的默认访问说明符为public。派生类时，默认访问说明符为private。

例如，程序3编译失败，程序4工作正常。

// Program 3
#include <stdio.h>
 
class Base {
public:
    int x;
};
 
class Derived : Base { }; // is equivalent to class Derived : private Base {}
 
int main()
{
  Derived d;
  d.x = 20; // compiler error because inheritance is private
  getchar();
  return 0;
}

// Program 4
#include <stdio.h>
 
class Base {
public:
    int x;
};
 
struct Derived : Base { }; // is equivalent to struct Derived : public Base {}
 
int main()
{
  Derived d;
  d.x = 20; // works fine because inheritance is public
  getchar();
  return 0;
}

引用c++ FAQ，

[7.8] What's the difference between the keywords struct and class? The members and base classes of a struct are public by default, while in class, they default to private. Note: you should make your base classes explicitly public, private, or protected, rather than relying on the defaults. Struct and class are otherwise functionally equivalent. OK, enough of that squeaky clean techno talk. Emotionally, most developers make a strong distinction between a class and a struct. A struct simply feels like an open pile of bits with very little in the way of encapsulation or functionality. A class feels like a living and responsible member of society with intelligent services, a strong encapsulation barrier, and a well defined interface. Since that's the connotation most people already have, you should probably use the struct keyword if you have a class that has very few methods and has public data (such things do exist in well designed systems!), but otherwise you should probably use the class keyword.

我发现了另一个不同。如果在类中没有定义构造函数，编译器将定义一个。但是在struct中，如果你没有定义构造函数，编译器也不会定义构造函数。因此，在某些情况下，我们确实不需要构造函数，struct是一个更好的选择(性能技巧)。 对不起，我的英语不好。

这只是一种惯例。可以创建结构来保存简单的数据，但稍后会随着成员函数和构造函数的添加而发展。另一方面，在struct中看到public: access之外的东西是不寻常的。

默认情况下，用关键字class定义的类的成员为private。用关键字struct(或union)定义的类的成员默认是公共的。 在基类没有访问说明符的情况下，当派生类声明为struct时假定为public，当类声明为class时假定为private。 你可以使用模板<类T>，但不能使用模板<结构T>。

还要注意，c++标准允许将类型前向声明为struct，然后在声明类型时使用class，反之亦然。同样，std::is_class<Y>::value对于Y是一个结构和类是true，但是对于枚举类是false。