我想知道在我的c++程序中某个函数在Linux上执行需要多少时间。之后，我想做一个速度比较。我看到了几个时间函数，但最终从boost。空间:
process_user_cpu_clock, captures user-CPU time spent by the current process
现在，我不清楚如果我使用上述函数，我会得到哪个CPU在该函数上花费的唯一时间吗?
其次，我找不到任何使用上述功能的例子。请问有谁能告诉我如何使用上面的功能?
p.s.:现在，我使用std::chrono::system_clock::now()以秒为单位获得时间，但这给了我不同的结果，因为不同的CPU负载每次。
在c++ 11中，这是一个非常容易使用的方法。你必须使用std::chrono::high_resolution_clock from <chrono>头。
像这样使用它:
#include <chrono>
/* Only needed for the sake of this example. */
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
void long_operation()
{
/* Simulating a long, heavy operation. */
using namespace std::chrono_literals;
std::this_thread::sleep_for(150ms);
}
int main()
{
using std::chrono::high_resolution_clock;
using std::chrono::duration_cast;
using std::chrono::duration;
using std::chrono::milliseconds;
auto t1 = high_resolution_clock::now();
long_operation();
auto t2 = high_resolution_clock::now();
/* Getting number of milliseconds as an integer. */
auto ms_int = duration_cast<milliseconds>(t2 - t1);
/* Getting number of milliseconds as a double. */
duration<double, std::milli> ms_double = t2 - t1;
std::cout << ms_int.count() << "ms\n";
std::cout << ms_double.count() << "ms\n";
return 0;
}
这将度量函数long_operation的持续时间。
可能的输出:
150ms
150.068ms
工作示例:https://godbolt.org/z/oe5cMd
下面是一个函数，它将测量作为参数传递的任何函数的执行时间:
#include <chrono>
#include <utility>
typedef std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::time_point TimeVar;
#define duration(a) std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::nanoseconds>(a).count()
#define timeNow() std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now()
template<typename F, typename... Args>
double funcTime(F func, Args&&... args){
TimeVar t1=timeNow();
func(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
return duration(timeNow()-t1);
}
使用示例:
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
typedef std::string String;
//first test function doing something
int countCharInString(String s, char delim){
int count=0;
String::size_type pos = s.find_first_of(delim);
while ((pos = s.find_first_of(delim, pos)) != String::npos){
count++;pos++;
}
return count;
}
//second test function doing the same thing in different way
int countWithAlgorithm(String s, char delim){
return std::count(s.begin(),s.end(),delim);
}
int main(){
std::cout<<"norm: "<<funcTime(countCharInString,"precision=10",'=')<<"\n";
std::cout<<"algo: "<<funcTime(countWithAlgorithm,"precision=10",'=');
return 0;
}
输出:
norm: 15555
algo: 2976
简单程序查找函数执行时间。
#include <iostream>
#include <ctime> // time_t
#include <cstdio>
void function()
{
for(long int i=0;i<1000000000;i++)
{
// do nothing
}
}
int main()
{
time_t begin,end; // time_t is a datatype to store time values.
time (&begin); // note time before execution
function();
time (&end); // note time after execution
double difference = difftime (end,begin);
printf ("time taken for function() %.2lf seconds.\n", difference );
return 0;
}
下面是一个优秀的仅头类模板，用于测量函数或任何代码块的运行时间:
#ifndef EXECUTION_TIMER_H
#define EXECUTION_TIMER_H
template<class Resolution = std::chrono::milliseconds>
class ExecutionTimer {
public:
using Clock = std::conditional_t<std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::is_steady,
std::chrono::high_resolution_clock,
std::chrono::steady_clock>;
private:
const Clock::time_point mStart = Clock::now();
public:
ExecutionTimer() = default;
~ExecutionTimer() {
const auto end = Clock::now();
std::ostringstream strStream;
strStream << "Destructor Elapsed: "
<< std::chrono::duration_cast<Resolution>( end - mStart ).count()
<< std::endl;
std::cout << strStream.str() << std::endl;
}
inline void stop() {
const auto end = Clock::now();
std::ostringstream strStream;
strStream << "Stop Elapsed: "
<< std::chrono::duration_cast<Resolution>(end - mStart).count()
<< std::endl;
std::cout << strStream.str() << std::endl;
}
}; // ExecutionTimer
#endif // EXECUTION_TIMER_H
下面是它的一些用法:
int main() {
{ // empty scope to display ExecutionTimer's destructor's message
// displayed in milliseconds
ExecutionTimer<std::chrono::milliseconds> timer;
// function or code block here
timer.stop();
}
{ // same as above
ExecutionTimer<std::chrono::microseconds> timer;
// code block here...
timer.stop();
}
{ // same as above
ExecutionTimer<std::chrono::nanoseconds> timer;
// code block here...
timer.stop();
}
{ // same as above
ExecutionTimer<std::chrono::seconds> timer;
// code block here...
timer.stop();
}
return 0;
}
由于类是一个模板，我们可以很容易地指定real我们想要测量和显示的时间。这是一个非常方便的实用工具类模板，用于做基准标记，非常容易使用。
对于旧的c++或C来说很简单:
#include <time.h> // includes clock_t and CLOCKS_PER_SEC
int main() {
clock_t start, end;
start = clock();
// ...code to measure...
end = clock();
double duration_sec = double(end-start)/CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
return 0;
}
计时精度(秒)为1.0/CLOCKS_PER_SEC
在c++ 11中，这是一个非常容易使用的方法。 我们可以从头文件中使用std::chrono::high_resolution_clock 我们可以编写一个方法，以易于阅读的形式打印方法执行时间。
例如，要找到1到1亿之间的所有质数，大约需要1分40秒。 因此，执行时间打印为:
Execution Time: 1 Minutes, 40 Seconds, 715 MicroSeconds, 715000 NanoSeconds
代码在这里:
#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>
using namespace std;
using namespace std::chrono;
typedef high_resolution_clock Clock;
typedef Clock::time_point ClockTime;
void findPrime(long n, string file);
void printExecutionTime(ClockTime start_time, ClockTime end_time);
int main()
{
long n = long(1E+8); // N = 100 million
ClockTime start_time = Clock::now();
// Write all the prime numbers from 1 to N to the file "prime.txt"
findPrime(n, "C:\\prime.txt");
ClockTime end_time = Clock::now();
printExecutionTime(start_time, end_time);
}
void printExecutionTime(ClockTime start_time, ClockTime end_time)
{
auto execution_time_ns = duration_cast<nanoseconds>(end_time - start_time).count();
auto execution_time_ms = duration_cast<microseconds>(end_time - start_time).count();
auto execution_time_sec = duration_cast<seconds>(end_time - start_time).count();
auto execution_time_min = duration_cast<minutes>(end_time - start_time).count();
auto execution_time_hour = duration_cast<hours>(end_time - start_time).count();
cout << "\nExecution Time: ";
if(execution_time_hour > 0)
cout << "" << execution_time_hour << " Hours, ";
if(execution_time_min > 0)
cout << "" << execution_time_min % 60 << " Minutes, ";
if(execution_time_sec > 0)
cout << "" << execution_time_sec % 60 << " Seconds, ";
if(execution_time_ms > 0)
cout << "" << execution_time_ms % long(1E+3) << " MicroSeconds, ";
if(execution_time_ns > 0)
cout << "" << execution_time_ns % long(1E+6) << " NanoSeconds, ";
}
在Scott Meyers的书中，我发现了一个通用泛型lambda表达式的例子，可以用来测量函数的执行时间。(c++ 14)
auto timeFuncInvocation =
[](auto&& func, auto&&... params) {
// get time before function invocation
const auto& start = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
// function invocation using perfect forwarding
std::forward<decltype(func)>(func)(std::forward<decltype(params)>(params)...);
// get time after function invocation
const auto& stop = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
return stop - start;
};
问题是，您只能测量一次执行，因此结果可能非常不同。为了获得可靠的结果，您应该测量大量的执行。 根据Andrei Alexandrescu在code::dive 2015会议上的演讲-编写快速代码I:
测量时间:tm = t + tq + tn + to
地点:
Tm -测量(观察)时间
T -实际感兴趣的时间
Tq -由量化噪声增加的时间
Tn -由各种噪声源添加的时间
To -开销时间(测量、循环、调用函数)
根据他在后面的演讲中所说的，你应该把大量执行中的最小值作为你的结果。 我鼓励你们去看他解释原因的那节课。
还有谷歌上的一个很好的库- https://github.com/google/benchmark。 这个库使用简单，功能强大。你可以在youtube上查看钱德勒·卡鲁斯的一些讲座，他在实践中使用了这个库。例如，2017年CppCon:钱德勒·卡鲁斯《无处可去》;
使用示例:
#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>
#include <vector>
auto timeFuncInvocation =
[](auto&& func, auto&&... params) {
// get time before function invocation
const auto& start = high_resolution_clock::now();
// function invocation using perfect forwarding
for(auto i = 0; i < 100000/*largeNumber*/; ++i) {
std::forward<decltype(func)>(func)(std::forward<decltype(params)>(params)...);
}
// get time after function invocation
const auto& stop = high_resolution_clock::now();
return (stop - start)/100000/*largeNumber*/;
};
void f(std::vector<int>& vec) {
vec.push_back(1);
}
void f2(std::vector<int>& vec) {
vec.emplace_back(1);
}
int main()
{
std::vector<int> vec;
std::vector<int> vec2;
std::cout << timeFuncInvocation(f, vec).count() << std::endl;
std::cout << timeFuncInvocation(f2, vec2).count() << std::endl;
std::vector<int> vec3;
vec3.reserve(100000);
std::vector<int> vec4;
vec4.reserve(100000);
std::cout << timeFuncInvocation(f, vec3).count() << std::endl;
std::cout << timeFuncInvocation(f2, vec4).count() << std::endl;
return 0;
}
编辑: 当然，你总是需要记住，你的编译器可以优化或不优化某些东西。像perf这样的工具在这种情况下很有用。
我建议使用steady_clock，它保证是单调的，不像high_resolution_clock。
#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>
using namespace std;
unsigned int stopwatch()
{
static auto start_time = chrono::steady_clock::now();
auto end_time = chrono::steady_clock::now();
auto delta = chrono::duration_cast<chrono::microseconds>(end_time - start_time);
start_time = end_time;
return delta.count();
}
int main() {
stopwatch(); //Start stopwatch
std::cout << "Hello World!\n";
cout << stopwatch() << endl; //Time to execute last line
for (int i=0; i<1000000; i++)
string s = "ASDFAD";
cout << stopwatch() << endl; //Time to execute for loop
}
输出:
Hello World!
62
163514
您可以使用一个简单的类来进行这种测量。
class duration_printer {
public:
duration_printer() : __start(std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now()) {}
~duration_printer() {
using namespace std::chrono;
high_resolution_clock::time_point end = high_resolution_clock::now();
duration<double> dur = duration_cast<duration<double>>(end - __start);
std::cout << dur.count() << " seconds" << std::endl;
}
private:
std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::time_point __start;
};
唯一需要做的是在函数的开始处创建一个对象
void veryLongExecutingFunction() {
duration_calculator dc;
for(int i = 0; i < 100000; ++i) std::cout << "Hello world" << std::endl;
}
int main() {
veryLongExecutingFunction();
return 0;
}
就是这样。可以修改该类以满足您的需求。
因为没有一个提供的答案是非常准确的或可复制的结果，我决定添加一个链接到我的代码，具有亚纳秒的精度和科学统计。
Note that this will only work to measure code that takes a (very) short time to run (aka, a few clock cycles to a few thousand): if they run so long that they are likely to be interrupted by some -heh- interrupt, then it is clearly not possible to give a reproducable and accurate result; the consequence of which is that the measurement never finishes: namely, it continues to measure until it is statistically 99.9% sure it has the right answer which never happens on a machine that has other processes running when the code takes too long.
https://github.com/CarloWood/cwds/blob/master/benchmark.h#L40
如果你想要安全的时间和代码行，你可以用一行宏来测量函数的执行时间:
a)实现如上所述的时间测量类(这是我的android实现):
class MeasureExecutionTime{
private:
const std::chrono::steady_clock::time_point begin;
const std::string caller;
public:
MeasureExecutionTime(const std::string& caller):caller(caller),begin(std::chrono::steady_clock::now()){}
~MeasureExecutionTime(){
const auto duration=std::chrono::steady_clock::now()-begin;
LOGD("ExecutionTime")<<"For "<<caller<<" is "<<std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>(duration).count()<<"ms";
}
};
b)添加一个方便的宏，它使用当前函数名作为TAG(在这里使用宏很重要，否则__FUNCTION__将计算为MeasureExecutionTime而不是你想测量的函数
#ifndef MEASURE_FUNCTION_EXECUTION_TIME
#define MEASURE_FUNCTION_EXECUTION_TIME const MeasureExecutionTime measureExecutionTime(__FUNCTION__);
#endif
c)在你想要测量的函数的开头写你的宏。例子:
void DecodeMJPEGtoANativeWindowBuffer(uvc_frame_t* frame_mjpeg,const ANativeWindow_Buffer& nativeWindowBuffer){
MEASURE_FUNCTION_EXECUTION_TIME
// Do some time-critical stuff
}
这将导致以下输出:
ExecutionTime: For DecodeMJPEGtoANativeWindowBuffer is 54ms
请注意，这(和所有其他建议的解决方案一样)将测量函数被调用和返回之间的时间，而不一定是CPU执行函数的时间。但是，如果您不给调度程序任何更改，通过调用sleep()或类似方法来挂起正在运行的代码，则两者之间没有区别。
#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>
void function()
{
// code here;
}
int main()
{
auto t1 = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
function();
auto t2 = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
auto duration = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::microseconds>( t2 - t1 ).count();
std::cout << duration<<"/n";
return 0;
}
这对我很管用。
注意:
high_resolution_clock不能在不同的标准库实现中实现一致，应该避免使用它。它通常只是std::chrono::steady_clock或std::chrono::system_clock的别名，但它是哪一个取决于库或配置。当它是system_clock时，它不是单调的(例如，时间可以倒退)。
例如，对于gcc的libstdc++，它是system_clock，对于MSVC，它是steady_clock，对于clang的libc++，它取决于配置。
通常应该直接使用std::chrono::steady_clock或std::chrono::system_clock，而不是std::chrono::high_resolution_clock:使用steady_clock测量持续时间，使用system_clock测量时钟时间。
c++ 11清理了Jahid的回复:
#include <chrono>
#include <thread>
void long_operation(int ms)
{
/* Simulating a long, heavy operation. */
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(ms));
}
template<typename F, typename... Args>
double funcTime(F func, Args&&... args){
std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::time_point t1 =
std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
func(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
return std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>(
std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now()-t1).count();
}
int main()
{
std::cout<<"expect 150: "<<funcTime(long_operation,150)<<"\n";
return 0;
}
这是一个非常基本的定时器类，你可以根据自己的需要进行扩展。我想要一些直接的东西，可以在代码中干净地使用。你可以通过这个链接来修改代码:http://tpcg.io/nd47hFqr。
class local_timer {
private:
std::chrono::_V2::system_clock::time_point start_time;
std::chrono::_V2::system_clock::time_point stop_time;
std::chrono::_V2::system_clock::time_point stop_time_temp;
std::chrono::microseconds most_recent_duration_usec_chrono;
double most_recent_duration_sec;
public:
local_timer() {
};
~local_timer() {
};
void start() {
this->start_time = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
};
void stop() {
this->stop_time = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
};
double get_time_now() {
this->stop_time_temp = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
this->most_recent_duration_usec_chrono = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::microseconds>(stop_time_temp-start_time);
this->most_recent_duration_sec = (long double)most_recent_duration_usec_chrono.count()/1000000;
return this->most_recent_duration_sec;
};
double get_duration() {
this->most_recent_duration_usec_chrono = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::microseconds>(stop_time-start_time);
this->most_recent_duration_sec = (long double)most_recent_duration_usec_chrono.count()/1000000;
return this->most_recent_duration_sec;
};
};
这个存在的用处
#include <iostream>
#include "timer.hpp" //if kept in an hpp file in the same folder, can also before your main function
int main() {
//create two timers
local_timer timer1 = local_timer();
local_timer timer2 = local_timer();
//set start time for timer1
timer1.start();
//wait 1 second
while(timer1.get_time_now() < 1.0) {
}
//save time
timer1.stop();
//print time
std::cout << timer1.get_duration() << " seconds, timer 1\n" << std::endl;
timer2.start();
for(long int i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {
//do something
if(i%1000000 == 0) {
//return time since loop started
std::cout << timer2.get_time_now() << " seconds, timer 2\n"<< std::endl;
}
}
return 0;
}
