我刚试过了，也许能满足你的需要。 根据参数的数量，您可以访问不同的函数。在第一次调用时初始化它。 函数映射隐藏在闭包中。

TEST = {};

TEST.multiFn = function(){
    // function map for our overloads
    var fnMap = {};

    fnMap[0] = function(){
        console.log("nothing here");
        return this;    //    support chaining
    }

    fnMap[1] = function(arg1){
        //    CODE here...
        console.log("1 arg: "+arg1);
        return this;
    };

    fnMap[2] = function(arg1, arg2){
        //    CODE here...
        console.log("2 args: "+arg1+", "+arg2);
        return this;
    };

    fnMap[3] = function(arg1,arg2,arg3){
        //    CODE here...
        console.log("3 args: "+arg1+", "+arg2+", "+arg3);
        return this;
    };

    console.log("multiFn is now initialized");

    //    redefine the function using the fnMap in the closure
    this.multiFn = function(){
        fnMap[arguments.length].apply(this, arguments);
        return this;
    };

    //    call the function since this code will only run once
    this.multiFn.apply(this, arguments);

    return this;    
};

测试它。

TEST.multiFn("0")
    .multiFn()
    .multiFn("0","1","2");

多年来，我一直在使用这个函数来美化我的重载:

function overload(){
  const fs = arguments, fallback = fs[fs.length - 1];
  return function(){
    const f = fs[arguments.length] || (arguments.length >= fs.length ? fallback : null);
    return f.apply(this, arguments);
  }
}

型:

function curry1(f){
  return curry2(f, f.length);
}

function curry2(f, minimum){
  return function(...applied){
    if (applied.length >= minimum) {
      return f.apply(this, applied);
    } else {
      return curry2(function(...args){
        return f.apply(this, applied.concat(args));
      }, minimum - applied.length);
    }
  }
}

export const curry = overload(null, curry1, curry2);

看看jQuery的off方法:

  function off( types, selector, fn ) {
    var handleObj, type;
    if ( types && types.preventDefault && types.handleObj ) {

        // ( event )  dispatched jQuery.Event
        handleObj = types.handleObj;
        jQuery( types.delegateTarget ).off(
            handleObj.namespace ?
                handleObj.origType + "." + handleObj.namespace :
                handleObj.origType,
            handleObj.selector,
            handleObj.handler
        );
        return this;
    }
    if ( typeof types === "object" ) {

        // ( types-object [, selector] )
        for ( type in types ) {
            this.off( type, selector, types[ type ] );
        }
        return this;
    }
    if ( selector === false || typeof selector === "function" ) {

        // ( types [, fn] )
        fn = selector;
        selector = undefined;
    }
    if ( fn === false ) {
        fn = returnFalse;
    }
    return this.each( function() {
        jQuery.event.remove( this, types, fn, selector );
    } );
  }

许多重载函数在优化性能时几乎不可读。你必须破译函数的头部。这可能比使用我提供的重载函数更快;但是，从人的角度来看，它在识别调用了哪个重载方面要慢一些。

在JS中没有实际的重载，无论如何我们仍然可以用几种方式模拟方法重载:

方法# 1: 使用对象

function test(x,options){
  if("a" in options)doSomething();
  else if("b" in options)doSomethingElse();
}
test("ok",{a:1});
test("ok",{b:"string"});

方法# 2: 使用rest (spread)参数

function test(x,...p){
 if(p[2])console.log("3 params passed"); //or if(typeof p[2]=="string")
else if (p[1])console.log("2 params passed");
else console.log("1 param passed");
}

方法# 3: 使用未定义的

function test(x, y, z){
 if(typeof(z)=="undefined")doSomething();
}

方法# 4: 类型检查

function test(x){
 if(typeof(x)=="string")console.log("a string passed")
 else ...
}

我们用over.js来解决这个问题是一种非常优雅的方式。你可以:

var obj = {

  /**
   * Says something in the console.
   *
   * say(msg) - Says something once.
   * say(msg, times) - Says something many times.
   */
  say: Over(
    function(msg$string){
      console.info(msg$string);
    },
    function(msg$string, times$number){
      for (var i = 0; i < times$number; i++) this.say(msg$string);
    }
  )

};

我经常这样做:

C#:

public string CatStrings(string p1)                  {return p1;}
public string CatStrings(string p1, int p2)          {return p1+p2.ToString();}
public string CatStrings(string p1, int p2, bool p3) {return p1+p2.ToString()+p3.ToString();}

CatStrings("one");        // result = one
CatStrings("one",2);      // result = one2
CatStrings("one",2,true); // result = one2true

JavaScript相当于:

function CatStrings(p1, p2, p3)
{
  var s = p1;
  if(typeof p2 !== "undefined") {s += p2;}
  if(typeof p3 !== "undefined") {s += p3;}
  return s;
};

CatStrings("one");        // result = one
CatStrings("one",2);      // result = one2
CatStrings("one",2,true); // result = one2true

This particular example is actually more elegant in javascript than C#. Parameters which are not specified are 'undefined' in javascript, which evaluates to false in an if statement. However, the function definition does not convey the information that p2 and p3 are optional. If you need a lot of overloading, jQuery has decided to use an object as the parameter, for example, jQuery.ajax(options). I agree with them that this is the most powerful and clearly documentable approach to overloading, but I rarely need more than one or two quick optional parameters.

编辑:根据Ian的建议更改IF测试

我想分享一个类似重载方法的有用示例。

function Clear(control)
{
  var o = typeof control !== "undefined" ? control : document.body;
  var children = o.childNodes;
  while (o.childNodes.length > 0)
    o.removeChild(o.firstChild);
}

用法: 明确的();//清除所有文件

明确(myDiv);//清除myDiv引用的面板