给定以下代码(不起作用):
while True:
# Snip: print out current state
while True:
ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
if ok.lower() == "y": break 2 # This doesn't work :(
if ok.lower() == "n": break
# Do more processing with menus and stuff
有办法解决这个问题吗?还是我必须先检查一次，跳出输入循环，然后再检查一次，如果用户满意，再跳出外部循环?
当前回答
要跳出多个嵌套循环，而不需要重构为函数，可以使用带有内置StopIteration异常的“模拟goto语句”:
try:
for outer in range(100):
for inner in range(100):
if break_early():
raise StopIteration
except StopIteration: pass
请参阅使用goto语句打破嵌套循环的讨论。
其他回答
尝试使用无限发电机。
from itertools import repeat
inputs = (get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)") for _ in repeat(None))
response = (i.lower()=="y" for i in inputs if i.lower() in ("y", "n"))
while True:
#snip: print out current state
if next(response):
break
#do more processing with menus and stuff
你可以使用一个标志来打破循环:
if found:
break
这里，'found'是标志，你最初将它设置为False，然后在循环中使用这段代码。
found = False
for table_height in range(500):
if found:
break
下面是三个for循环的完整代码:
found = False
for table_height in range(500):
if found:
break
for cat_height in range(500):
if found:
break
for tort_height in range(500):
equation1 = table_height + cat_height == tort_height + 170
equation2 = table_height + tort_height == cat_height + 130
if equation1 and equation2:
print('table', table_height, ' cat', cat_height, ' tortoise', tort_height)
found = True
break
在这段代码中，如果等式1和等式2为True，它将设置'found'标志为True，并跳出最里面的for循环，它也将跳出其他两个for循环，因为'found'为True。
希望这能有所帮助:
x = True
y = True
while x == True:
while y == True:
ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
if ok == "y" or ok == "Y":
x,y = False,False #breaks from both loops
if ok == "n" or ok == "N":
break #breaks from just one
# this version uses a level counter to choose how far to break out
break_levels = 0
while True:
# snip: print out current state
while True:
ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
if ok == "y" or ok == "Y":
break_levels = 1 # how far nested, excluding this break
break
if ok == "n" or ok == "N":
break # normal break
if break_levels:
break_levels -= 1
break # pop another level
if break_levels:
break_levels -= 1
break
# ...and so on
我最近遇到了这个问题，为了避免重复的return语句，因为它会隐藏逻辑错误，我研究了@yak的想法。这在嵌套的for循环中工作得很好，但不是很优雅。另一种方法是在下一次循环之前检查条件:
b = None
for a in range(10):
if something(a, b): # should never = True if b is None
break
for b in range(20):
pass
这可能并不适用于所有地方，但具有适应性，如果需要，它的优点是允许复制条件，而不是潜在的结果。
