给定以下代码(不起作用):

while True:
    # Snip: print out current state
    while True:
        ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
        if ok.lower() == "y": break 2 # This doesn't work :(
        if ok.lower() == "n": break

    # Do more processing with menus and stuff

有办法解决这个问题吗?还是我必须先检查一次,跳出输入循环,然后再检查一次,如果用户满意,再跳出外部循环?


当前回答

另一种将迭代减少到单层循环的方法是使用生成器,这也在python参考中指定

for i, j in ((i, j) for i in A for j in B):
    print(i , j)
    if (some_condition):
        break

您可以将它扩展到循环的任意级别

缺点是您不能再只打破单个级别。要么全有,要么全无。

另一个缺点是它不能与while循环一起工作。我最初想在Python上发布这个答案-“break”跳出所有循环,但不幸的是,它被关闭为这个循环的副本

其他回答

首先,您还可以考虑将获取和验证输入的过程作为一个函数;在该函数中,如果值正确,则返回值,如果不正确,则继续在while循环中旋转。这本质上避免了您解决的问题,并且通常可以应用于更一般的情况(打破多个循环)。如果你一定要在代码中保留这个结构,并且真的不想处理记帐布尔值……

你也可以用下面的方式使用goto(在这里使用一个愚人节模块):

#import the stuff
from goto import goto, label

while True:
    #snip: print out current state
    while True:
        ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
        if ok == "y" or ok == "Y": goto .breakall
        if ok == "n" or ok == "N": break
    #do more processing with menus and stuff
label .breakall

我知道,我知道,“你不应该使用goto”之类的,但它在这种奇怪的情况下很管用。

如果两个条件为真,则继续循环。

我认为这是一种更python化的方式:

dejaVu = True

while dejaVu:
    while True:
        ok = raw_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
        if ok == "y" or ok == "Y" or ok == "n" or ok == "N":
            dejaVu = False
            break

和上一台很像,但更紧凑。 (布尔值只是数字)

breaker = False #our mighty loop exiter!
while True:
    while True:
        ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
        breaker+= (ok.lower() == "y")
        break

    if breaker: # the interesting part!
        break   # <--- !

以下是一个非常简短的版本: 创建名为break_out_nested.py的文件

import itertools
import sys

it = sys.modules[__name__] # this allows us to share variables with break_out_nested.py when we import it 


def bol(*args):
    condi = args[-1] # the condition function
    i = args[:-1] # all iterables 
    for p in itertools.product(*i): # itertools.product creates the nested loop
        if condi(): # if the condition is True, we return 
            return
        yield p # if not, we yield the result 

现在你只需要几行就可以打破嵌套的循环(数据来自Rafiq的例子)

from break_out_nested import it, bol # import what we have just created

# you need to create new variables as attributes of it,
# because break_out_nested has only access to these variables
it.i, it.j, it.k = 1, 1, 1
# the break condition
def cond(): return it.i % 3 == 0 and it.j % 3 == 0 and it.k % 3 == 0

# The condition will be checked in each loop 
for it.i, it.j, it.k in bol(range(1, 6, 1), range(1, 11, 2, ), range(1, 21, 4), cond):
    print(it.i, it.j, it.k)

更多的例子:

def cond(): return it.i + it.j + it.k == 777

it.i, it.j, it.k = 0, 0, 0
for it.i, it.j, it.k in bol(range(100), range(1000), range(10000), cond):
    print(it.i, it.j, it.k)




def cond(): return it.i + it.j + it.k >= 100000

it.i, it.j, it.k = 0, 0, 0
# you dont have to use it.i, it.j, it.k as the loop variables, you can
# use anything you want, but you have to update the variables somewhere
for i, j, k in bol(range(100), range(1000), range(10000), cond):
    it.i, it.j, it.k = i * 10, j * 100, k * 100
    print(it.i, it.j, it.k)

下面是一个似乎可以工作的实现:

break_ = False
for i in range(10):
    if break_:
        break
    for j in range(10):
        if j == 3:
            break_ = True
            break
        else:
            print(i, j)

唯一的缺点是你必须在循环之前定义break_。