给定以下代码(不起作用):
while True:
# Snip: print out current state
while True:
ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
if ok.lower() == "y": break 2 # This doesn't work :(
if ok.lower() == "n": break
# Do more processing with menus and stuff
有办法解决这个问题吗?还是我必须先检查一次，跳出输入循环，然后再检查一次，如果用户满意，再跳出外部循环?
当前回答
您可以定义一个变量(例如break_statement)，然后在发生两次中断条件时将其更改为不同的值，并在if语句中使用它来中断第二个循环。
while True:
break_statement=0
while True:
ok = raw_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
if ok == "n" or ok == "N":
break
if ok == "y" or ok == "Y":
break_statement=1
break
if break_statement==1:
break
其他回答
希望这能有所帮助:
x = True
y = True
while x == True:
while y == True:
ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
if ok == "y" or ok == "Y":
x,y = False,False #breaks from both loops
if ok == "n" or ok == "N":
break #breaks from just one
使用numpy.ndindex可以简单地将多个循环转换为单个、可破坏的循环
for i in range(n):
for j in range(n):
val = x[i, j]
break # still inside the outer loop!
for i, j in np.ndindex(n, n):
val = x[i, j]
break # you left the only loop there was!
您确实需要索引到对象中，而不是显式地遍历值，但至少在简单的情况下，它似乎比大多数答案所建议的要简单大约2-20倍。
如果两个条件为真，则继续循环。
我认为这是一种更python化的方式:
dejaVu = True
while dejaVu:
while True:
ok = raw_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
if ok == "y" or ok == "Y" or ok == "n" or ok == "N":
dejaVu = False
break
另一种将迭代减少到单层循环的方法是使用生成器，这也在python参考中指定
for i, j in ((i, j) for i in A for j in B):
print(i , j)
if (some_condition):
break
您可以将它扩展到循环的任意级别
缺点是您不能再只打破单个级别。要么全有，要么全无。
另一个缺点是它不能与while循环一起工作。我最初想在Python上发布这个答案-“break”跳出所有循环，但不幸的是，它被关闭为这个循环的副本
# this version uses a level counter to choose how far to break out
break_levels = 0
while True:
# snip: print out current state
while True:
ok = get_input("Is this ok? (y/n)")
if ok == "y" or ok == "Y":
break_levels = 1 # how far nested, excluding this break
break
if ok == "n" or ok == "N":
break # normal break
if break_levels:
break_levels -= 1
break # pop another level
if break_levels:
break_levels -= 1
break
# ...and so on
