我使用基于Ron的解决方案的宏。

#define TICK(XXX) NSDate *XXX = [NSDate date]
#define TOCK(XXX) NSLog(@"%s: %f", #XXX, -[XXX timeIntervalSinceNow])

对于代码行:

TICK(TIME1);
/// do job here
TOCK(TIME1);

我们将在控制台中看到如下内容:TIME1: 0.096618

既然你想优化时间从一个页面移动到另一个UIWebView，这是不是意味着你真的在寻找优化Javascript加载这些页面?

为此，我想看看WebKit分析器，就像这里所说的:

http://www.alertdebugging.com/2009/04/29/building-a-better-javascript-profiler-with-webkit/

另一种方法是从高层次开始，思考如何设计有问题的网页，使用AJAX样式的页面加载来最小化加载时间，而不是每次都刷新整个web视图。

NSDate *methodStart = [NSDate date];

/* ... Do whatever you need to do ... */

NSDate *methodFinish = [NSDate date];
NSTimeInterval executionTime = [methodFinish timeIntervalSinceDate:methodStart];
NSLog(@"executionTime = %f", executionTime);

迅速:

let methodStart = NSDate()

/* ... Do whatever you need to do ... */

let methodFinish = NSDate()
let executionTime = methodFinish.timeIntervalSinceDate(methodStart)
print("Execution time: \(executionTime)")

Swift3:

let methodStart = Date()

/* ... Do whatever you need to do ... */

let methodFinish = Date()
let executionTime = methodFinish.timeIntervalSince(methodStart)
print("Execution time: \(executionTime)")

易于使用，具有亚毫秒精度。

对于Swift 4，添加一个委托到你的类:

public protocol TimingDelegate: class {
    var _TICK: Date?{ get set }
}

extension TimingDelegate {
    var TICK: Date {
        _TICK = Date()
        return(_TICK)!
     }

    func TOCK(message: String)  {

        if (_TICK == nil){
            print("Call 'TICK' first!")
        }

        if (message == ""){
            print("\(Date().timeIntervalSince(_TICK!))")
        }
        else{
            print("\(message): \(Date().timeIntervalSince(_TICK!))")
        }
    }
}

加入我们班:

class MyViewcontroller: UIViewController, TimingDelegate

然后添加到你的类:

var _TICK: Date?

当你想为某事计时时，可以从以下开始:

TICK

最后:

TOCK("Timing the XXX routine")

struct TIME {

    static var ti = mach_timebase_info()
    static var k: Double = 1
    static var mach_stamp: Double {

        if ti.denom == 0 {
            mach_timebase_info(&ti)
            k = Double(ti.numer) / Double(ti.denom) * 1e-6
        }
        return Double(mach_absolute_time()) * k
    }
    static var stamp: Double { return NSDate.timeIntervalSinceReferenceDate() * 1000 }
}

do {
    let mach_start = TIME.mach_stamp
    usleep(200000)
    let mach_diff = TIME.mach_stamp - mach_start

    let start = TIME.stamp
    usleep(200000)
    let diff = TIME.stamp - start

    print(mach_diff, diff)
}

对于OS X上的细粒度计时，您应该使用在<mach/mach_time.h>中声明的mach_absolute_time():

#include <mach/mach_time.h>
#include <stdint.h>

// Do some stuff to setup for timing
const uint64_t startTime = mach_absolute_time();
// Do some stuff that you want to time
const uint64_t endTime = mach_absolute_time();

// Time elapsed in Mach time units.
const uint64_t elapsedMTU = endTime - startTime;

// Get information for converting from MTU to nanoseconds
mach_timebase_info_data_t info;
if (mach_timebase_info(&info))
   handleErrorConditionIfYoureBeingCareful();

// Get elapsed time in nanoseconds:
const double elapsedNS = (double)elapsedMTU * (double)info.numer / (double)info.denom;

当然，关于细粒度度量的通常警告也适用;您可能最好多次调用测试中的例程，并求平均值/取最小值/一些其他形式的处理。

此外，请注意，您可能会发现使用Shark等工具对应用程序运行进行概要分析更有用。这不会为您提供确切的时间信息，但它会告诉您应用程序的时间在哪里花费了多少百分比，这通常更有用(但并不总是如此)。