我们需要将setter传递给debpublished方法:

以下是StackBlitz的一个例子:

import React from "react";
import debounce from "lodash/debounce";

export default function App() {
  const [state, setState] = React.useState({
    debouncedLog: ""
  });

  const debouncedLog = React.useCallback(
    debounce((setState, log) => {
      setState(prevState => ({
        ...prevState,
        debouncedLog: log
      }));
    }, 500),
    []
  );

  const onChange = React.useCallback(({ target: { value: log } }) => {
    debouncedLog(setState, log); // passing the setState along...
  }, []);
  return (
    <div>
      <input onChange={onChange} style={{ outline: "1px blue solid" }} />

      <pre>Debounced Value: {state.debouncedLog}</pre>
    </div>
  );
}

祝你好运…

只是最近react和lodash的另一个变体。

class Filter extends Component {
  static propTypes = {
    text: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
    onChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired
  }

  state = {
    initialText: '',
    text: ''
  }

  constructor (props) {
    super(props)

    this.setText = this.setText.bind(this)
    this.onChange = _.fp.debounce(500)(this.onChange.bind(this))
  }

  static getDerivedStateFromProps (nextProps, prevState) {
    const { text } = nextProps

    if (text !== prevState.initialText) {
      return { initialText: text, text }
    }

    return null
  }

  setText (text) {
    this.setState({ text })
    this.onChange(text)
  }

  onChange (text) {
    this.props.onChange(text)
  }

  render () {
    return (<input value={this.state.text} onChange={(event) => this.setText(event.target.value)} />)
  }
}

I was searching for a solution to the same problem and came across this thread as well as some others but they had the same problem: if you are trying to do a handleOnChange function and you need the value from an event target, you will get cannot read property value of null or some such error. In my case, I also needed to preserve the context of this inside the debounced function since I'm executing a fluxible action. Here's my solution, it works well for my use case so I'm leaving it here in case anyone comes across this thread:

// at top of file:
var myAction = require('../actions/someAction');

// inside React.createClass({...});

handleOnChange: function (event) {
    var value = event.target.value;
    var doAction = _.curry(this.context.executeAction, 2);

    // only one parameter gets passed into the curried function,
    // so the function passed as the first parameter to _.curry()
    // will not be executed until the second parameter is passed
    // which happens in the next function that is wrapped in _.debounce()
    debouncedOnChange(doAction(myAction), value);
},

debouncedOnChange: _.debounce(function(action, value) {
    action(value);
}, 300)

你试过吗?

function debounce(fn, delay) {
  var timer = null;
  return function() {
    var context = this,
      args = arguments;
    clearTimeout(timer);
    timer = setTimeout(function() {
      fn.apply(context, args);
    }, delay);
  };
}

var SearchBox = React.createClass({
  render: function() {
    return <input type="search" name="p" onChange={this.handleOnChange} />;
  },

  handleOnChange: function(event) {
    debounce(\\ Your handleChange code , 200);
  }
});

与其在debounce()中包装handleOnChange，不如在debounce()中包装回调函数中的ajax调用，从而不破坏事件对象。就像这样:

handleOnChange: function (event) {
   debounce(
     $.ajax({})
  , 250);
}

如果你只需要从事件对象中获取DOM输入元素，解决方案就简单多了——只需要使用ref。注意，这需要下划线:

class Item extends React.Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
        this.saveTitle = _.throttle(this.saveTitle.bind(this), 1000);
    }
    saveTitle(){
        let val = this.inputTitle.value;
        // make the ajax call
    }
    render() {
        return <input 
                    ref={ el => this.inputTitle = el } 
                    type="text" 
                    defaultValue={this.props.title} 
                    onChange={this.saveTitle} />
    }
}