我希望能够自省一个c++类的名称,内容(即成员及其类型)等。这里我说的是原生c++,而不是托管c++,托管c++有反射。我意识到c++使用RTTI提供了一些有限的信息。哪些附加库(或其他技术)可以提供这些信息?
当前回答
周围有两种反射。
Inspection by iterating over members of a type, enumerating its methods and so on. This is not possible with C++. Inspection by checking whether a class-type (class, struct, union) has a method or nested type, is derived from another particular type. This kind of thing is possible with C++ using template-tricks. Use boost::type_traits for many things (like checking whether a type is integral). For checking for the existence of a member function, use Templated check for the existence of a class member function? . For checking whether a certain nested type exists, use plain SFINAE .
如果你想要实现1),比如查看一个类有多少个方法,或者获取一个类id的字符串表示形式,那么恐怕标准c++没有办法做到这一点。你必须使用其中任何一个
一个元编译器,如Qt元对象编译器,它翻译你的代码,添加额外的元信息。 由宏组成的框架,允许您添加所需的元信息。你需要告诉框架所有的方法、类名、基类和它需要的一切。
c++的设计考虑到了速度。如果您想要高级别的检查,就像c#或Java所做的那样,不做一些额外的工作就无法做到这一点。
其他回答
I did something like what you're after once, and while it's possible to get some level of reflection and access to higher-level features, the maintenance headache might not be worth it. My system was used to keep the UI classes completely separated from the business logic through delegation akin to Objective-C's concept of message passing and forwarding. The way to do it is to create some base class that is capable of mapping symbols (I used a string pool but you could do it with enums if you prefer speed and compile-time error handling over total flexibility) to function pointers (actually not pure function pointers, but something similar to what Boost has with Boost.Function--which I didn't have access to at the time). You can do the same thing for your member variables as long as you have some common base class capable of representing any value. The entire system was an unabashed ripoff of Key-Value Coding and Delegation, with a few side effects that were perhaps worth the sheer amount of time necessary to get every class that used the system to match all of its methods and members up with legal calls: 1) Any class could call any method on any other class without having to include headers or write fake base classes so the interface could be predefined for the compiler; and 2) The getters and setters of the member variables were easy to make thread-safe because changing or accessing their values was always done through 2 methods in the base class of all objects.
It also led to the possibility of doing some really weird things that otherwise aren't easy in C++. For example I could create an Array object that contained arbitrary items of any type, including itself, and create new arrays dynamically by passing a message to all array items and collecting the return values (similar to map in Lisp). Another was the implementation of key-value observing, whereby I was able to set up the UI to respond immediately to changes in the members of backend classes instead of constantly polling the data or unnecessarily redrawing the display.
也许您更感兴趣的是,您还可以转储为类定义的所有方法和成员,而且是字符串形式。
该系统的缺点可能会让您望而却步:添加所有消息和键值非常繁琐;它比没有反射要慢;你会讨厌看到boost::static_pointer_cast和boost::dynamic_pointer_cast遍布你的代码库;强类型系统的局限性仍然存在,您实际上只是将它们隐藏了一些,所以它不那么明显。字符串中的错别字也不是一个有趣或容易发现的惊喜。
As to how to implement something like this: just use shared and weak pointers to some common base (mine was very imaginatively called "Object") and derive for all the types you want to use. I'd recommend installing Boost.Function instead of doing it the way I did, which was with some custom crap and a ton of ugly macros to wrap the function pointer calls. Since everything is mapped, inspecting objects is just a matter of iterating through all of the keys. Since my classes were essentially as close to a direct ripoff of Cocoa as possible using only C++, if you want something like that then I'd suggest using the Cocoa documentation as a blueprint.
编辑:更新的坏链接截至2017年2月7日。
我想没有人提到这一点:
在CERN,他们使用c++的全反射系统:
欧洲核子研究中心的反射。看起来效果很好。
编辑:不再维护CAMP;有两个fork可供选择:
其中一个也被称为CAMP,并且基于相同的API。 思考是部分重写,应该优先考虑,因为它不需要Boost;它使用c++ 11。
CAMP是MIT授权的库(以前是LGPL),它向c++语言添加了反射。它在编译中不需要特定的预处理步骤,但是必须手动进行绑定。
目前的Tegesoft库使用Boost,但也有一个使用c++ 11的分支不再需要Boost。
我也想要一匹小马,但小马不是免费的。: - p
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/C%2B%2B_Programming/RTTI是你将得到的。像您所考虑的反射——运行时可用的完整描述性元数据——在默认情况下c++中不存在。
查看Classdesc http://classdesc.sf.net。它以类“描述符”的形式提供了反射,可以与任何标准c++编译器一起工作(是的,它可以与Visual Studio和GCC一起工作),并且不需要源代码注释(尽管存在一些处理棘手情况的pragmas)。它已经开发了十多年,并在一些工业规模的项目中使用。
推荐文章
- 如何构建和使用谷歌TensorFlow c++ api
- 断言是邪恶的吗?
- 下面这些短语在c++中是什么意思:0 -,default-和value-initialization?
- 在STL地图中,使用map::insert比[]更好吗?
- C++ Linux的想法?
- 如何为Fedora安装g++ ?
- Std::cin输入空格?
- c++标准是否要求iostreams的性能很差,或者我只是在处理一个糟糕的实现?
- gcc在哪里查找C和c++头文件?
- 为什么我们需要require require ?
- 解析c++中的命令行参数?
- 我如何在c++中创建一个随机的字母数字字符串?
- c++中的atan和atan2有什么区别?
- 现代c++能让你免费获得性能吗?
- 一门语言是如何自我扩展的?