扩展@Marek的回答:如果你想避免字符串变成因素和效率不是一个问题，尝试一下

do.call(rbind, lapply(your_list, data.frame, stringsAsFactors=FALSE))

我发现的每个解决方案似乎只适用于列表中的每个对象都具有相同的长度。当列表中对象的长度不相等时，我需要将列表转换为data.frame。下面是我提出的基于R的解决方案。毫无疑问，这是非常低效的，但它似乎确实有效。

x1 <- c(2, 13)
x2 <- c(2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 13)
x3 <- c(1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 9, 10, 11, 11, 12, 13, 13)
my.results <- list(x1, x2, x3)

# identify length of each list
my.lengths <- unlist(lapply(my.results, function (x) { length(unlist(x))}))
my.lengths
#[1]  2  6 20

# create a vector of values in all lists
my.values <- as.numeric(unlist(c(do.call(rbind, lapply(my.results, as.data.frame)))))
my.values
#[1]  2 13  2  4  6  9 11 13  1  1  2  3  3  4  5  5  6  7  7  8  9  9 10 11 11 12 13 13

my.matrix <- matrix(NA, nrow = max(my.lengths), ncol = length(my.lengths))

my.cumsum <- cumsum(my.lengths)

mm <- 1

for(i in 1:length(my.lengths)) {

     my.matrix[1:my.lengths[i],i] <- my.values[mm:my.cumsum[i]]

     mm <- my.cumsum[i]+1

}

my.df <- as.data.frame(my.matrix)
my.df
#   V1 V2 V3
#1   2  2  1
#2  13  4  1
#3  NA  6  2
#4  NA  9  3
#5  NA 11  3
#6  NA 13  4
#7  NA NA  5
#8  NA NA  5
#9  NA NA  6
#10 NA NA  7
#11 NA NA  7
#12 NA NA  8
#13 NA NA  9
#14 NA NA  9
#15 NA NA 10
#16 NA NA 11
#17 NA NA 11
#18 NA NA 12
#19 NA NA 13
#20 NA NA 13

你可以使用plyr包装。 例如表单的嵌套列表

l <- list(a = list(var.1 = 1, var.2 = 2, var.3 = 3)
      , b = list(var.1 = 4, var.2 = 5, var.3 = 6)
      , c = list(var.1 = 7, var.2 = 8, var.3 = 9)
      , d = list(var.1 = 10, var.2 = 11, var.3 = 12)
      )

现在长度为4，并且l中的每个列表包含另一个长度为3的列表。 现在你可以跑了

  library (plyr)
  df <- ldply (l, data.frame)

应该会得到和@Marek和@nico相同的结果。

Reshape2产生与上面的plyr示例相同的输出:

library(reshape2)
l <- list(a = list(var.1 = 1, var.2 = 2, var.3 = 3)
          , b = list(var.1 = 4, var.2 = 5, var.3 = 6)
          , c = list(var.1 = 7, var.2 = 8, var.3 = 9)
          , d = list(var.1 = 10, var.2 = 11, var.3 = 12)
)
l <- melt(l)
dcast(l, L1 ~ L2)

收益率:

  L1 var.1 var.2 var.3
1  a     1     2     3
2  b     4     5     6
3  c     7     8     9
4  d    10    11    12

如果你几乎没有像素，你可以在一行w/ recast()中完成这一切。

根据列表的结构，有一些tidyverse选项可以很好地处理长度不等的列表:

l <- list(a = list(var.1 = 1, var.2 = 2, var.3 = 3)
        , b = list(var.1 = 4, var.2 = 5)
        , c = list(var.1 = 7, var.3 = 9)
        , d = list(var.1 = 10, var.2 = 11, var.3 = NA))

df <- dplyr::bind_rows(l)
df <- purrr::map_df(l, dplyr::bind_rows)
df <- purrr::map_df(l, ~.x)

# all create the same data frame:
# A tibble: 4 x 3
  var.1 var.2 var.3
  <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1     1     2     3
2     4     5    NA
3     7    NA     9
4    10    11    NA

你也可以混合向量和数据帧:

library(dplyr)
bind_rows(
  list(a = 1, b = 2),
  data_frame(a = 3:4, b = 5:6),
  c(a = 7)
)

# A tibble: 4 x 2
      a     b
  <dbl> <dbl>
1     1     2
2     3     5
3     4     6
4     7    NA

tibble包有一个函数enframe()，它通过将嵌套的列表对象强制转换为嵌套的tibble(“整齐的”数据帧)对象来解决这个问题。下面是R for Data Science的一个简单例子:

x <- list(
    a = 1:5,
    b = 3:4, 
    c = 5:6
) 

df <- enframe(x)
df
#> # A tibble: 3 × 2
#>    name     value
#>   <chr>    <list>
#>    1     a <int [5]>
#>    2     b <int [2]>
#>    3     c <int [2]>

Since you have several nests in your list, l, you can use the unlist(recursive = FALSE) to remove unnecessary nesting to get just a single hierarchical list and then pass to enframe(). I use tidyr::unnest() to unnest the output into a single level "tidy" data frame, which has your two columns (one for the group name and one for the observations with the groups value). If you want columns that make wide, you can add a column using add_column() that just repeats the order of the values 132 times. Then just spread() the values.

library(tidyverse)

l <- replicate(
    132,
    list(sample(letters, 20)),
    simplify = FALSE
)

l_tib <- l %>% 
    unlist(recursive = FALSE) %>% 
    enframe() %>% 
    unnest()
l_tib
#> # A tibble: 2,640 x 2
#>     name value
#>    <int> <chr>
#> 1      1     d
#> 2      1     z
#> 3      1     l
#> 4      1     b
#> 5      1     i
#> 6      1     j
#> 7      1     g
#> 8      1     w
#> 9      1     r
#> 10     1     p
#> # ... with 2,630 more rows

l_tib_spread <- l_tib %>%
    add_column(index = rep(1:20, 132)) %>%
    spread(key = index, value = value)
l_tib_spread
#> # A tibble: 132 x 21
#>     name   `1`   `2`   `3`   `4`   `5`   `6`   `7`   `8`   `9`  `10`  `11`
#> *  <int> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1      1     d     z     l     b     i     j     g     w     r     p     y
#> 2      2     w     s     h     r     i     k     d     u     a     f     j
#> 3      3     r     v     q     s     m     u     j     p     f     a     i
#> 4      4     o     y     x     n     p     i     f     m     h     l     t
#> 5      5     p     w     v     d     k     a     l     r     j     q     n
#> 6      6     i     k     w     o     c     n     m     b     v     e     q
#> 7      7     c     d     m     i     u     o     e     z     v     g     p
#> 8      8     f     s     e     o     p     n     k     x     c     z     h
#> 9      9     d     g     o     h     x     i     c     y     t     f     j
#> 10    10     y     r     f     k     d     o     b     u     i     x     s
#> # ... with 122 more rows, and 9 more variables: `12` <chr>, `13` <chr>,
#> #   `14` <chr>, `15` <chr>, `16` <chr>, `17` <chr>, `18` <chr>,
#> #   `19` <chr>, `20` <chr>