该方法使用一个tidyverse包(purrr)。

列表:

x <- as.list(mtcars)

将其转换为数据帧(更具体地说是tibble):

library(purrr)
map_df(x, ~.x)

编辑时间:2021年5月30日

这实际上可以通过dplyr中的bind_rows()函数实现。

x <- as.list(mtcars)
dplyr::bind_rows(x)

 A tibble: 32 x 11
     mpg   cyl  disp    hp  drat    wt  qsec    vs    am  gear  carb
   <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
 1  21       6  160    110  3.9   2.62  16.5     0     1     4     4
 2  21       6  160    110  3.9   2.88  17.0     0     1     4     4
 3  22.8     4  108     93  3.85  2.32  18.6     1     1     4     1
 4  21.4     6  258    110  3.08  3.22  19.4     1     0     3     1
 5  18.7     8  360    175  3.15  3.44  17.0     0     0     3     2
 6  18.1     6  225    105  2.76  3.46  20.2     1     0     3     1
 7  14.3     8  360    245  3.21  3.57  15.8     0     0     3     4
 8  24.4     4  147.    62  3.69  3.19  20       1     0     4     2
 9  22.8     4  141.    95  3.92  3.15  22.9     1     0     4     2
10  19.2     6  168.   123  3.92  3.44  18.3     1     0     4     4
# ... with 22 more rows

我发现的每个解决方案似乎只适用于列表中的每个对象都具有相同的长度。当列表中对象的长度不相等时，我需要将列表转换为data.frame。下面是我提出的基于R的解决方案。毫无疑问，这是非常低效的，但它似乎确实有效。

x1 <- c(2, 13)
x2 <- c(2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 13)
x3 <- c(1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 9, 10, 11, 11, 12, 13, 13)
my.results <- list(x1, x2, x3)

# identify length of each list
my.lengths <- unlist(lapply(my.results, function (x) { length(unlist(x))}))
my.lengths
#[1]  2  6 20

# create a vector of values in all lists
my.values <- as.numeric(unlist(c(do.call(rbind, lapply(my.results, as.data.frame)))))
my.values
#[1]  2 13  2  4  6  9 11 13  1  1  2  3  3  4  5  5  6  7  7  8  9  9 10 11 11 12 13 13

my.matrix <- matrix(NA, nrow = max(my.lengths), ncol = length(my.lengths))

my.cumsum <- cumsum(my.lengths)

mm <- 1

for(i in 1:length(my.lengths)) {

     my.matrix[1:my.lengths[i],i] <- my.values[mm:my.cumsum[i]]

     mm <- my.cumsum[i]+1

}

my.df <- as.data.frame(my.matrix)
my.df
#   V1 V2 V3
#1   2  2  1
#2  13  4  1
#3  NA  6  2
#4  NA  9  3
#5  NA 11  3
#6  NA 13  4
#7  NA NA  5
#8  NA NA  5
#9  NA NA  6
#10 NA NA  7
#11 NA NA  7
#12 NA NA  8
#13 NA NA  9
#14 NA NA  9
#15 NA NA 10
#16 NA NA 11
#17 NA NA 11
#18 NA NA 12
#19 NA NA 13
#20 NA NA 13

对于使用purrr系列解决方案的并行(多核，多会话等)解决方案，使用:

library (furrr)
plan(multisession) # see below to see which other plan() is the more efficient
myTibble <- future_map_dfc(l, ~.x)

其中l是列表。

要对最有效的计划()进行基准测试，您可以使用:

library(tictoc)
plan(sequential) # reference time
# plan(multisession) # benchamark plan() goes here. See ?plan().
tic()
myTibble <- future_map_dfc(l, ~.x)
toc()

或者你可以使用tibble包(来自tidyverse):

#create examplelist
l <- replicate(
  132,
  as.list(sample(letters, 20)),
  simplify = FALSE
)

#package tidyverse
library(tidyverse)

#make a dataframe (or use as_tibble)
df <- as_data_frame(l,.name_repair = "unique")

这是最后对我有用的方法:

do.call（“rbind”， lapply（S1， as.data.frame））

tibble包有一个函数enframe()，它通过将嵌套的列表对象强制转换为嵌套的tibble(“整齐的”数据帧)对象来解决这个问题。下面是R for Data Science的一个简单例子:

x <- list(
    a = 1:5,
    b = 3:4, 
    c = 5:6
) 

df <- enframe(x)
df
#> # A tibble: 3 × 2
#>    name     value
#>   <chr>    <list>
#>    1     a <int [5]>
#>    2     b <int [2]>
#>    3     c <int [2]>

Since you have several nests in your list, l, you can use the unlist(recursive = FALSE) to remove unnecessary nesting to get just a single hierarchical list and then pass to enframe(). I use tidyr::unnest() to unnest the output into a single level "tidy" data frame, which has your two columns (one for the group name and one for the observations with the groups value). If you want columns that make wide, you can add a column using add_column() that just repeats the order of the values 132 times. Then just spread() the values.

library(tidyverse)

l <- replicate(
    132,
    list(sample(letters, 20)),
    simplify = FALSE
)

l_tib <- l %>% 
    unlist(recursive = FALSE) %>% 
    enframe() %>% 
    unnest()
l_tib
#> # A tibble: 2,640 x 2
#>     name value
#>    <int> <chr>
#> 1      1     d
#> 2      1     z
#> 3      1     l
#> 4      1     b
#> 5      1     i
#> 6      1     j
#> 7      1     g
#> 8      1     w
#> 9      1     r
#> 10     1     p
#> # ... with 2,630 more rows

l_tib_spread <- l_tib %>%
    add_column(index = rep(1:20, 132)) %>%
    spread(key = index, value = value)
l_tib_spread
#> # A tibble: 132 x 21
#>     name   `1`   `2`   `3`   `4`   `5`   `6`   `7`   `8`   `9`  `10`  `11`
#> *  <int> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1      1     d     z     l     b     i     j     g     w     r     p     y
#> 2      2     w     s     h     r     i     k     d     u     a     f     j
#> 3      3     r     v     q     s     m     u     j     p     f     a     i
#> 4      4     o     y     x     n     p     i     f     m     h     l     t
#> 5      5     p     w     v     d     k     a     l     r     j     q     n
#> 6      6     i     k     w     o     c     n     m     b     v     e     q
#> 7      7     c     d     m     i     u     o     e     z     v     g     p
#> 8      8     f     s     e     o     p     n     k     x     c     z     h
#> 9      9     d     g     o     h     x     i     c     y     t     f     j
#> 10    10     y     r     f     k     d     o     b     u     i     x     s
#> # ... with 122 more rows, and 9 more variables: `12` <chr>, `13` <chr>,
#> #   `14` <chr>, `15` <chr>, `16` <chr>, `17` <chr>, `18` <chr>,
#> #   `19` <chr>, `20` <chr>