下面的代码确实按照我需要的方式工作,但它很丑,过多或其他一些事情。我已经看了公式,并试图写一些解决方案,但我最终得到了类似数量的语句。
在这种情况下,是否有一种数学公式对我有益,或者是否可以接受16个if语句?
为了解释代码,这是一款基于同时回合制的游戏。两名玩家各有四个操作按钮,结果来自一个数组(0-3),但变量“1”和“2”可以赋值任何东西,如果这有帮助的话。结果是,0 =双方都不赢,1 = p1赢,2 = p2赢,3 =双方都赢。
public int fightMath(int one, int two) {
if(one == 0 && two == 0) { result = 0; }
else if(one == 0 && two == 1) { result = 0; }
else if(one == 0 && two == 2) { result = 1; }
else if(one == 0 && two == 3) { result = 2; }
else if(one == 1 && two == 0) { result = 0; }
else if(one == 1 && two == 1) { result = 0; }
else if(one == 1 && two == 2) { result = 2; }
else if(one == 1 && two == 3) { result = 1; }
else if(one == 2 && two == 0) { result = 2; }
else if(one == 2 && two == 1) { result = 1; }
else if(one == 2 && two == 2) { result = 3; }
else if(one == 2 && two == 3) { result = 3; }
else if(one == 3 && two == 0) { result = 1; }
else if(one == 3 && two == 1) { result = 2; }
else if(one == 3 && two == 2) { result = 3; }
else if(one == 3 && two == 3) { result = 3; }
return result;
}
感谢@Joe Harper,因为我最终使用了他的答案的变体。为了进一步瘦身,每4个结果中有2个是相同的,我进一步瘦身。
我可能会在某个时候回到这个问题上,但如果没有由多个if语句引起的主要阻力,那么我现在就保留这个问题。我将进一步研究表格矩阵和开关语句解决方案。
public int fightMath(int one, int two) {
if (one === 0) {
if (two === 2) { return 1; }
else if(two === 3) { return 2; }
else { return 0; }
} else if (one === 1) {
if (two === 2) { return 2; }
else if (two === 3) { return 1; }
else { return 0; }
} else if (one === 2) {
if (two === 0) { return 2; }
else if (two === 1) { return 1; }
else { return 3; }
} else if (one === 3) {
if (two === 0) { return 1; }
else if (two === 1) { return 2; }
else { return 3; }
}
}
看看我们都知道些什么
1:你的答案对于参与人1 P1和参与人2 P2是对称的。这对于格斗游戏来说很有意义,但你也可以利用它来完善你的逻辑。
2:3拍0拍2拍1拍3。这些情况中唯一不包括的情况是0对1和2对3的组合。换句话说,唯一的胜利表是这样的:0击败2,1击败3,2击败1,3击败0。
3:如果0/1人对位,则平局无命中,但如果2/3人对位,则双方均命中
首先,让我们构建一个单向函数,告诉我们是否赢了:
// returns whether we beat our opponent
public boolean doesBeat(int attacker, int defender) {
int[] beats = {2, 3, 1, 0};
return defender == beats[attacker];
}
然后我们可以使用这个函数来组合最终的结果:
// returns the overall fight result
// bit 0 = one hits
// bit 1 = two hits
public int fightMath(int one, int two)
{
// Check to see whether either has an outright winning combo
if (doesBeat(one, two))
return 1;
if (doesBeat(two, one))
return 2;
// If both have 0/1 then its hitless draw but if both have 2/3 then they both hit.
// We can check this by seeing whether the second bit is set and we need only check
// one's value as combinations where they don't both have 0/1 or 2/3 have already
// been dealt with
return (one & 2) ? 3 : 0;
}
虽然这可以说比许多答案中提供的查找表更复杂,而且可能更慢,但我相信这是一种更好的方法,因为它实际上封装了代码的逻辑,并向阅读您代码的任何人描述它。我认为这是一个更好的实现。
(这是一段时间以来,我做任何Java,所以抱歉,如果语法错误,希望它仍然是可理解的,如果我有一点错误)
顺便说一下,0-3显然意味着什么;它们不是任意的值,所以给它们命名会有帮助。
我个人喜欢级联三元运算符:
int result = condition1
? result1
: condition2
? result2
: condition3
? result3
: resultElse;
但在你的情况下,你可以使用:
final int[] result = new int[/*16*/] {
0, 0, 1, 2,
0, 0, 2, 1,
2, 1, 3, 3,
1, 2, 3, 3
};
public int fightMath(int one, int two) {
return result[one*4 + two];
}
或者,你可以注意到比特的模式:
one two result
section 1: higher bits are equals =>
both result bits are equals to that higher bits
00 00 00
00 01 00
01 00 00
01 01 00
10 10 11
10 11 11
11 10 11
11 11 11
section 2: higher bits are different =>
lower result bit is inverse of lower bit of 'two'
higher result bit is lower bit of 'two'
00 10 01
00 11 10
01 10 10
01 11 01
10 00 10
10 01 01
11 00 01
11 01 10
所以你可以使用魔法:
int fightMath(int one, int two) {
int b1 = one & 2, b2 = two & 2;
if (b1 == b2)
return b1 | (b1 >> 1);
b1 = two & 1;
return (b1 << 1) | (~b1);
}