下面的代码确实按照我需要的方式工作,但它很丑,过多或其他一些事情。我已经看了公式,并试图写一些解决方案,但我最终得到了类似数量的语句。

在这种情况下,是否有一种数学公式对我有益,或者是否可以接受16个if语句?

为了解释代码,这是一款基于同时回合制的游戏。两名玩家各有四个操作按钮,结果来自一个数组(0-3),但变量“1”和“2”可以赋值任何东西,如果这有帮助的话。结果是,0 =双方都不赢,1 = p1赢,2 = p2赢,3 =双方都赢。

public int fightMath(int one, int two) {

    if(one == 0 && two == 0) { result = 0; }
    else if(one == 0 && two == 1) { result = 0; }
    else if(one == 0 && two == 2) { result = 1; }
    else if(one == 0 && two == 3) { result = 2; }
    else if(one == 1 && two == 0) { result = 0; }
    else if(one == 1 && two == 1) { result = 0; }
    else if(one == 1 && two == 2) { result = 2; }
    else if(one == 1 && two == 3) { result = 1; }
    else if(one == 2 && two == 0) { result = 2; }
    else if(one == 2 && two == 1) { result = 1; }
    else if(one == 2 && two == 2) { result = 3; }
    else if(one == 2 && two == 3) { result = 3; }
    else if(one == 3 && two == 0) { result = 1; }
    else if(one == 3 && two == 1) { result = 2; }
    else if(one == 3 && two == 2) { result = 3; }
    else if(one == 3 && two == 3) { result = 3; }

    return result;
}

当前回答

感谢@Joe Harper,因为我最终使用了他的答案的变体。为了进一步瘦身,每4个结果中有2个是相同的,我进一步瘦身。

我可能会在某个时候回到这个问题上,但如果没有由多个if语句引起的主要阻力,那么我现在就保留这个问题。我将进一步研究表格矩阵和开关语句解决方案。

public int fightMath(int one, int two) {
  if (one === 0) {
    if (two === 2) { return 1; }
    else if(two === 3) { return 2; }
    else { return 0; }
  } else if (one === 1) {
    if (two === 2) { return 2; }
    else if (two === 3) { return 1; }
    else { return 0; }
  } else if (one === 2) {
    if (two === 0) { return 2; }
    else if (two === 1) { return 1; }
    else { return 3; }
  } else if (one === 3) {
    if (two === 0) { return 1; }
    else if (two === 1) { return 2; }
    else { return 3; }
  }
}

其他回答

相反,你可以这样做

   public int fightMath(int one, int two) {
    return Calculate(one,two)

    }


    private int Calculate(int one,int two){

    if (one==0){
        if(two==0){
     //return value}
    }else if (one==1){
   // return value as per condtiion
    }

    }

这使用了一点bitmagic(你已经通过在一个整数中保存两个比特信息(low/high & attack/block)来做到这一点):

我没有运行,只是在这里输入,请仔细检查。这个想法肯定有效。 编辑:现在对每个输入进行测试,工作正常。

public int fightMath(int one, int two) {
    if(one<2 && two<2){ //both players blocking
        return 0; // nobody hits
    }else if(one>1 && two>1){ //both players attacking
        return 3; // both hit
    }else{ // some of them attack, other one blocks
        int different_height = (one ^ two) & 1; // is 0 if they are both going for the same height - i.e. blocker wins, and 1 if height is different, thus attacker wins
        int attacker = one>1?1:0; // is 1 if one is the attacker, two is the blocker, and 0 if one is the blocker, two is the attacker
        return (attacker ^ different_height) + 1;
    }
}

或者我应该建议把这两个信息分离成单独的变量? 主要基于上面这样的位操作的代码通常很难维护。

下面是一个相当简洁的版本,类似于JAB的回应。这使用地图来存储哪个移动战胜其他移动。

public enum Result {
  P1Win, P2Win, BothWin, NeitherWin;
}

public enum Move {
  BLOCK_HIGH, BLOCK_LOW, ATTACK_HIGH, ATTACK_LOW;

  static final Map<Move, List<Move>> beats = new EnumMap<Move, List<Move>>(
      Move.class);

  static {
    beats.put(BLOCK_HIGH, new ArrayList<Move>());
    beats.put(BLOCK_LOW, new ArrayList<Move>());
    beats.put(ATTACK_HIGH, Arrays.asList(ATTACK_LOW, BLOCK_LOW));
    beats.put(ATTACK_LOW, Arrays.asList(ATTACK_HIGH, BLOCK_HIGH));
  }

  public static Result compare(Move p1Move, Move p2Move) {
    boolean p1Wins = beats.get(p1Move).contains(p2Move);
    boolean p2Wins = beats.get(p2Move).contains(p1Move);

    if (p1Wins) {
      return (p2Wins) ? Result.BothWin : Result.P1Win;
    }
    if (p2Wins) {
      return (p1Wins) ? Result.BothWin : Result.P2Win;
    }

    return Result.NeitherWin;
  }
} 

例子:

System.out.println(Move.compare(Move.ATTACK_HIGH, Move.BLOCK_LOW));

打印:

P1Win

如果你无法想出一个公式,你可以使用一个表格来描述有限的结果:

final int[][] result = new int[][] {
  { 0, 0, 1, 2 },
  { 0, 0, 2, 1 },
  { 2, 1, 3, 3 },
  { 1, 2, 3, 3 }
};
return result[one][two];

我想到的第一件事基本上与Francisco Presencia给出的答案相同,但有所优化:

public int fightMath(int one, int two)
{
    switch (one*10 + two)
    {
    case  0:
    case  1:
    case 10:
    case 11:
        return 0;
    case  2:
    case 13:
    case 21:
    case 30:
        return 1;
    case  3:
    case 12:
    case 20:
    case 31:
        return 2;
    case 22:
    case 23:
    case 32:
    case 33:
        return 3;
    }
}

你可以进一步优化它,使最后的情况(3)为默认情况:

    //case 22:
    //case 23:
    //case 32:
    //case 33:
    default:
        return 3;

此方法的优点是,与其他一些建议的方法相比,更容易看到1和2的哪个值对应于哪个返回值。