下面是一个相当简洁的版本，类似于JAB的回应。这使用地图来存储哪个移动战胜其他移动。

public enum Result {
  P1Win, P2Win, BothWin, NeitherWin;
}

public enum Move {
  BLOCK_HIGH, BLOCK_LOW, ATTACK_HIGH, ATTACK_LOW;

  static final Map<Move, List<Move>> beats = new EnumMap<Move, List<Move>>(
      Move.class);

  static {
    beats.put(BLOCK_HIGH, new ArrayList<Move>());
    beats.put(BLOCK_LOW, new ArrayList<Move>());
    beats.put(ATTACK_HIGH, Arrays.asList(ATTACK_LOW, BLOCK_LOW));
    beats.put(ATTACK_LOW, Arrays.asList(ATTACK_HIGH, BLOCK_HIGH));
  }

  public static Result compare(Move p1Move, Move p2Move) {
    boolean p1Wins = beats.get(p1Move).contains(p2Move);
    boolean p2Wins = beats.get(p2Move).contains(p1Move);

    if (p1Wins) {
      return (p2Wins) ? Result.BothWin : Result.P1Win;
    }
    if (p2Wins) {
      return (p1Wins) ? Result.BothWin : Result.P2Win;
    }

    return Result.NeitherWin;
  }
} 

例子:

System.out.println(Move.compare(Move.ATTACK_HIGH, Move.BLOCK_LOW));

打印:

P1Win

下面是一个相当简洁的版本，类似于JAB的回应。这使用地图来存储哪个移动战胜其他移动。

public enum Result {
  P1Win, P2Win, BothWin, NeitherWin;
}

public enum Move {
  BLOCK_HIGH, BLOCK_LOW, ATTACK_HIGH, ATTACK_LOW;

  static final Map<Move, List<Move>> beats = new EnumMap<Move, List<Move>>(
      Move.class);

  static {
    beats.put(BLOCK_HIGH, new ArrayList<Move>());
    beats.put(BLOCK_LOW, new ArrayList<Move>());
    beats.put(ATTACK_HIGH, Arrays.asList(ATTACK_LOW, BLOCK_LOW));
    beats.put(ATTACK_LOW, Arrays.asList(ATTACK_HIGH, BLOCK_HIGH));
  }

  public static Result compare(Move p1Move, Move p2Move) {
    boolean p1Wins = beats.get(p1Move).contains(p2Move);
    boolean p2Wins = beats.get(p2Move).contains(p1Move);

    if (p1Wins) {
      return (p2Wins) ? Result.BothWin : Result.P1Win;
    }
    if (p2Wins) {
      return (p1Wins) ? Result.BothWin : Result.P2Win;
    }

    return Result.NeitherWin;
  }
} 

例子:

System.out.println(Move.compare(Move.ATTACK_HIGH, Move.BLOCK_LOW));

打印:

P1Win

使用常量或枚举使代码更具可读性 尝试将代码拆分为更多的函数 试着利用问题的对称性

这里是一个建议，但在这里使用int型仍然有点难看:

static final int BLOCK_HIGH = 0;
static final int BLOCK_LOW = 1;
static final int ATTACK_HIGH = 2;
static final int ATTACK_LOW = 3;

public static int fightMath(int one, int two) {
    boolean player1Wins = handleAttack(one, two);
    boolean player2Wins = handleAttack(two, one);
    return encodeResult(player1Wins, player2Wins); 
}



private static boolean handleAttack(int one, int two) {
     return one == ATTACK_HIGH && two != BLOCK_HIGH
        || one == ATTACK_LOW && two != BLOCK_LOW
        || one == BLOCK_HIGH && two == ATTACK_HIGH
        || one == BLOCK_LOW && two == ATTACK_LOW;

}

private static int encodeResult(boolean player1Wins, boolean player2Wins) {
    return (player1Wins ? 1 : 0) + (player2Wins ? 2 : 0);
}

使用结构化类型作为输入和输出会更好。输入实际上有两个字段:位置和类型(阻挡或攻击)。输出也有两个字段:player1Wins和player2Wins。将其编码为单个整数会使代码更难阅读。

class PlayerMove {
    PlayerMovePosition pos;
    PlayerMoveType type;
}

enum PlayerMovePosition {
    HIGH,LOW
}

enum PlayerMoveType {
    BLOCK,ATTACK
}

class AttackResult {
    boolean player1Wins;
    boolean player2Wins;

    public AttackResult(boolean player1Wins, boolean player2Wins) {
        this.player1Wins = player1Wins;
        this.player2Wins = player2Wins;
    }
}

AttackResult fightMath(PlayerMove a, PlayerMove b) {
    return new AttackResult(isWinningMove(a, b), isWinningMove(b, a));
}

boolean isWinningMove(PlayerMove a, PlayerMove b) {
    return a.type == PlayerMoveType.ATTACK && !successfulBlock(b, a)
            || successfulBlock(a, b);
}

boolean successfulBlock(PlayerMove a, PlayerMove b) {
    return a.type == PlayerMoveType.BLOCK 
            && b.type == PlayerMoveType.ATTACK 
            && a.pos == b.pos;
}

不幸的是，Java并不擅长表达这类数据类型。

说实话，每个人都有自己的代码风格。我没想到性能会受到太大影响。如果您比使用开关箱版本更能理解这一点，那么请继续使用此版本。

您可以嵌套if语句，因此最后的if检查可能会略微提高性能，因为它不会经过那么多if语句。但是在你的java基础课程中，它可能不会有什么好处。

else if(one == 3 && two == 3) { result = 3; }

所以，与其…

if(one == 0 && two == 0) { result = 0; }
else if(one == 0 && two == 1) { result = 0; }
else if(one == 0 && two == 2) { result = 1; }
else if(one == 0 && two == 3) { result = 2; }

你会做……

if(one == 0) 
{ 
    if(two == 0) { result = 0; }
    else if(two == 1) { result = 0; }
    else if(two == 2) { result = 1; }
    else if(two == 3) { result = 2; }
}

按照你的喜好重新格式化。

这并没有使代码看起来更好，但我相信它可能会加快一点速度。

我希望我正确理解了逻辑。比如:

public int fightMath (int one, int two)
{
    int oneHit = ((one == 3 && two != 1) || (one == 2 && two != 0)) ? 1 : 0;
    int twoHit = ((two == 3 && one != 1) || (two == 2 && one != 0)) ? 2 : 0;

    return oneHit+twoHit;
}

检查一个击中高或一个击中低不被阻止，同样的球员二。

编辑:算法不完全理解，“命中”奖励时，我没有意识到(谢谢elias):

public int fightMath (int one, int two)
{
    int oneAttack = ((one == 3 && two != 1) || (one == 2 && two != 0)) ? 1 : (one >= 2) ? 2 : 0;
    int twoAttack = ((two == 3 && one != 1) || (two == 2 && one != 0)) ? 2 : (two >= 2) ? 1 : 0;

    return oneAttack | twoAttack;
}

除了JAB之外，我不喜欢任何提出的解决方案。其他方法都不容易阅读代码和理解正在计算的内容。

以下是我如何编写这段代码——我只会c#，不懂Java，但你可以想象:

const bool t = true;
const bool f = false;
static readonly bool[,] attackResult = {
    { f, f, t, f }, 
    { f, f, f, t },
    { f, t, t, t },
    { t, f, t, t }
};
[Flags] enum HitResult 
{ 
    Neither = 0,
    PlayerOne = 1,
    PlayerTwo = 2,
    Both = PlayerOne | PlayerTwo
}
static HitResult ResolveAttack(int one, int two)
{
    return 
        (attackResult[one, two] ? HitResult.PlayerOne : HitResult.Neither) | 
        (attackResult[two, one] ? HitResult.PlayerTwo : HitResult.Neither);
}    

现在，这里计算的内容更加清楚了:这强调了我们正在计算谁受到了什么攻击，并返回两个结果。

然而，这可能会更好;布尔数组有点不透明。我喜欢表格查找方法，但我更倾向于以一种能够明确游戏语义的方式来编写它。也就是说，与其“攻击为零，防御为一，结果是没有命中”，不如找到一种方法，让代码更清楚地暗示“低踢攻击和低阻挡防御，结果是没有命中”。让代码反映游戏的业务逻辑。