为什么c++没有虚构造函数?
当前回答
与面向对象的语言(如Smalltalk或Python)不同,这些语言的构造函数是表示类的对象的虚拟方法(这意味着您不需要GoF抽象工厂模式,因为您可以传递表示类的对象,而不是自己创建),c++是一种基于类的语言,并且没有表示语言的任何构造的对象。该类在运行时不作为对象存在,因此不能对其调用虚方法。
这符合“不用就不用付钱”的理念,尽管我所见过的每个大型c++项目最终都实现了某种形式的抽象工厂或反射。
其他回答
A virtual-table(vtable) is made for each Class having one or more 'virtual-functions'. Whenever an Object is created of such class, it contains a 'virtual-pointer' which points to the base of corresponding vtable. Whenever there is a virtual function call, the vtable is used to resolve to the function address. Constructor can not be virtual, because when constructor of a class is executed there is no vtable in the memory, means no virtual pointer defined yet. Hence the constructor should always be non-virtual.
虚函数用于根据指针所指向的对象类型调用函数,而不是指针本身的类型。但是构造函数不会被“调用”。它只在声明对象时调用一次。因此,在c++中构造函数不能被设为虚函数。
The virtual mechanism only works when you have a based class pointer to a derived class object. Construction has it's own rules for the calling of base class constructors, basically base class to derived. How could a virtual constructor be useful or called? I don't know what other languages do, but I can't see how a virtual constructor could be useful or even implemented. Construction needs to have taken place for the virtual mechanism to make any sense and construction also needs to have taken place for the vtable structures to have been created which provides the mechanics of the polymorphic behaviour.
尽管由于对象类型是对象创建的先决条件,所以虚拟构造函数的概念不太适合,但它并没有完全被推翻。
GOF的“工厂方法”设计模式利用了虚拟构造函数的“概念”,这在某些设计情况下很方便。
If you think logically about how constructors work and what the meaning/usage of a virtual function is in C++ then you will realise that a virtual constructor would be meaningless in C++. Declaring something virtual in C++ means that it can be overridden by a sub-class of the current class, however the constructor is called when the objected is created, at that time you cannot be creating a sub-class of the class, you must be creating the class so there would never be any need to declare a constructor virtual.
另一个原因是,构造函数的名字与其类名相同如果我们将构造函数声明为virtual,那么它应该在它的派生类中以相同的名字重新定义,但两个类的名字不能相同。所以不可能有一个虚拟构造函数。