为什么是双指针?

目标是使用函数改变studentA所指向的对象。

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>


typedef struct Person{
    char * name;
} Person; 

/**
 * we need a ponter to a pointer, example: &studentA
 */
void change(Person ** x, Person * y){
    *x = y; // since x is a pointer to a pointer, we access its value: a pointer to a Person struct.
}

void dontChange(Person * x, Person * y){
    x = y;
}

int main()
{

    Person * studentA = (Person *)malloc(sizeof(Person));
    studentA->name = "brian";

    Person * studentB = (Person *)malloc(sizeof(Person));
    studentB->name = "erich";

    /**
     * we could have done the job as simple as this!
     * but we need more work if we want to use a function to do the job!
     */
    // studentA = studentB;

    printf("1. studentA = %s (not changed)\n", studentA->name);

    dontChange(studentA, studentB);
    printf("2. studentA = %s (not changed)\n", studentA->name);

    change(&studentA, studentB);
    printf("3. studentA = %s (changed!)\n", studentA->name);

    return 0;
}

/**
 * OUTPUT:
 * 1. studentA = brian (not changed)
 * 2. studentA = brian (not changed)
 * 3. studentA = erich (changed!)
 */

I have used double pointers today while I was programming something for work, so I can answer why we had to use them (it's the first time I actually had to use double pointers). We had to deal with real time encoding of frames contained in buffers which are members of some structures. In the encoder we had to use a pointer to one of those structures. The problem was that our pointer was being changed to point to other structures from another thread. In order to use the current structure in the encoder, I had to use a double pointer, in order to point to the pointer that was being modified in another thread. It wasn't obvious at first, at least for us, that we had to take this approach. A lot of address were printed in the process :)).

当你处理在应用程序其他地方被更改的指针时，你应该使用双指针。在处理返回和寻址给您的硬件时，您可能还会发现双指针是必须的。

简单的例子，你可能已经见过很多次了

int main(int argc, char **argv)

在第二个参数中有它:指向char的指针的指针。

注意，指针表示法(char* c)和数组表示法(char c[])在函数参数中是可互换的。所以你也可以写char *argv[]。换句话说，char *argv[]和char **argv是可互换的。

上面所代表的实际上是一个字符序列数组(在启动时给予程序的命令行参数)。

有关上述函数签名的更多详细信息，请参见此回答。

有点晚了，但希望这能帮助到一些人。

在C语言中，数组总是在堆栈上分配内存，因此函数不能返回 一个(非静态)数组，因为内存分配在堆栈上 当执行到达当前块的末尾时自动释放。 当你想处理二维数组时，这真的很烦人 (即矩阵)，并实现一些可以改变和返回矩阵的函数。 要实现这一点，可以使用指针对指针来实现矩阵 动态分配内存:

/* Initializes a matrix */
double** init_matrix(int num_rows, int num_cols){
    // Allocate memory for num_rows float-pointers
    double** A = calloc(num_rows, sizeof(double*));
    // return NULL if the memory couldn't allocated
    if(A == NULL) return NULL;
    // For each double-pointer (row) allocate memory for num_cols floats
    for(int i = 0; i < num_rows; i++){
        A[i] = calloc(num_cols, sizeof(double));
        // return NULL if the memory couldn't allocated
        // and free the already allocated memory
        if(A[i] == NULL){
            for(int j = 0; j < i; j++){
                free(A[j]);
            }
            free(A);
            return NULL;
        }
    }
    return A;
} 

这里有一个例子:

double**       double*           double
             -------------       ---------------------------------------------------------
   A ------> |   A[0]    | ----> | A[0][0] | A[0][1] | A[0][2] | ........ | A[0][cols-1] |
             | --------- |       ---------------------------------------------------------
             |   A[1]    | ----> | A[1][0] | A[1][1] | A[1][2] | ........ | A[1][cols-1] |
             | --------- |       ---------------------------------------------------------
             |     .     |                                    .
             |     .     |                                    .
             |     .     |                                    .
             | --------- |       ---------------------------------------------------------
             |   A[i]    | ----> | A[i][0] | A[i][1] | A[i][2] | ........ | A[i][cols-1] |
             | --------- |       ---------------------------------------------------------
             |     .     |                                    .
             |     .     |                                    .
             |     .     |                                    .
             | --------- |       ---------------------------------------------------------
             | A[rows-1] | ----> | A[rows-1][0] | A[rows-1][1] | ... | A[rows-1][cols-1] |
             -------------       ---------------------------------------------------------

The double-pointer-to-double-pointer A points to the first element A[0] of a memory block whose elements are double-pointers itself. You can imagine these double-pointers as the rows of the matrix. That's the reason why every double-pointer allocates memory for num_cols elements of type double. Furthermore A[i] points to the i-th row, i.e. A[i] points to A[i][0] and that's just the first double-element of the memory block for the i-th row. Finally, you can access the element in the i-th row and j-th column easily with A[i][j].

下面是一个完整的例子来演示它的用法:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>

/* Initializes a matrix */
double** init_matrix(int num_rows, int num_cols){
    // Allocate memory for num_rows double-pointers
    double** matrix = calloc(num_rows, sizeof(double*));
    // return NULL if the memory couldn't allocated
    if(matrix == NULL) return NULL;
    // For each double-pointer (row) allocate memory for num_cols
    // doubles
    for(int i = 0; i < num_rows; i++){
        matrix[i] = calloc(num_cols, sizeof(double));
        // return NULL if the memory couldn't allocated
        // and free the already allocated memory
        if(matrix[i] == NULL){
            for(int j = 0; j < i; j++){
                free(matrix[j]);
            }
            free(matrix);
            return NULL;
        }
    }
    return matrix;
}

/* Fills the matrix with random double-numbers between -1 and 1 */
void randn_fill_matrix(double** matrix, int rows, int cols){
    for (int i = 0; i < rows; ++i){
        for (int j = 0; j < cols; ++j){
            matrix[i][j] = (double) rand()/RAND_MAX*2.0-1.0;
        }
    }
}


/* Frees the memory allocated by the matrix */
void free_matrix(double** matrix, int rows, int cols){
    for(int i = 0; i < rows; i++){
        free(matrix[i]);
    }
    free(matrix);
}

/* Outputs the matrix to the console */
void print_matrix(double** matrix, int rows, int cols){
    for(int i = 0; i < rows; i++){
        for(int j = 0; j < cols; j++){
            printf(" %- f ", matrix[i][j]);
        }
        printf("\n");
    }
}


int main(){
    srand(time(NULL));
    int m = 3, n = 3;
    double** A = init_matrix(m, n);
    randn_fill_matrix(A, m, n);
    print_matrix(A, m, n);
    free_matrix(A, m, n);
    return 0;
}

Pointers to pointers also come in handy as "handles" to memory where you want to pass around a "handle" between functions to re-locatable memory. That basically means that the function can change the memory that is being pointed to by the pointer inside the handle variable, and every function or object that is using the handle will properly point to the newly relocated (or allocated) memory. Libraries like to-do this with "opaque" data-types, that is data-types were you don't have to worry about what they're doing with the memory being pointed do, you simply pass around the "handle" between the functions of the library to perform some operations on that memory ... the library functions can be allocating and de-allocating the memory under-the-hood without you having to explicitly worry about the process of memory management or where the handle is pointing.

例如:

#include <stdlib.h>

typedef unsigned char** handle_type;

//some data_structure that the library functions would work with
typedef struct 
{
    int data_a;
    int data_b;
    int data_c;
} LIB_OBJECT;

handle_type lib_create_handle()
{
    //initialize the handle with some memory that points to and array of 10 LIB_OBJECTs
    handle_type handle = malloc(sizeof(handle_type));
    *handle = malloc(sizeof(LIB_OBJECT) * 10);

    return handle;
}

void lib_func_a(handle_type handle) { /*does something with array of LIB_OBJECTs*/ }

void lib_func_b(handle_type handle)
{
    //does something that takes input LIB_OBJECTs and makes more of them, so has to
    //reallocate memory for the new objects that will be created

    //first re-allocate the memory somewhere else with more slots, but don't destroy the
    //currently allocated slots
    *handle = realloc(*handle, sizeof(LIB_OBJECT) * 20);

    //...do some operation on the new memory and return
}

void lib_func_c(handle_type handle) { /*does something else to array of LIB_OBJECTs*/ }

void lib_free_handle(handle_type handle) 
{
    free(*handle);
    free(handle); 
}


int main()
{
    //create a "handle" to some memory that the library functions can use
    handle_type my_handle = lib_create_handle();

    //do something with that memory
    lib_func_a(my_handle);

    //do something else with the handle that will make it point somewhere else
    //but that's invisible to us from the standpoint of the calling the function and
    //working with the handle
    lib_func_b(my_handle); 

    //do something with new memory chunk, but you don't have to think about the fact
    //that the memory has moved under the hood ... it's still pointed to by the "handle"
    lib_func_c(my_handle);

    //deallocate the handle
    lib_free_handle(my_handle);

    return 0;
}

希望这能有所帮助，

杰森

比较变量的修改值和指针的修改值:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

void changeA(int (*a))
{
  (*a) = 10;
}

void changeP(int *(*P))
{
  (*P) = malloc(sizeof((*P)));
}

int main(void)
{
  int A = 0;

  printf("orig. A = %d\n", A);
  changeA(&A);
  printf("modi. A = %d\n", A);

  /*************************/

  int *P = NULL;

  printf("orig. P = %p\n", P);
  changeP(&P);
  printf("modi. P = %p\n", P);

  free(P);

  return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}

这帮助我避免指针被调用函数修改时返回指针的值(用于单链表)。

古老的(坏的):

int *func(int *P)
{
  ...
  return P;
}

int main(void)
{
  int *pointer;
  pointer = func(pointer);
  ...
}    

新(更好的):

void func(int **pointer)
{
  ...
}

int main(void)
{
  int *pointer;
  func(&pointer);
  ...
}