有点晚了，但希望这能帮助到一些人。

在C语言中，数组总是在堆栈上分配内存，因此函数不能返回 一个(非静态)数组，因为内存分配在堆栈上 当执行到达当前块的末尾时自动释放。 当你想处理二维数组时，这真的很烦人 (即矩阵)，并实现一些可以改变和返回矩阵的函数。 要实现这一点，可以使用指针对指针来实现矩阵 动态分配内存:

/* Initializes a matrix */
double** init_matrix(int num_rows, int num_cols){
    // Allocate memory for num_rows float-pointers
    double** A = calloc(num_rows, sizeof(double*));
    // return NULL if the memory couldn't allocated
    if(A == NULL) return NULL;
    // For each double-pointer (row) allocate memory for num_cols floats
    for(int i = 0; i < num_rows; i++){
        A[i] = calloc(num_cols, sizeof(double));
        // return NULL if the memory couldn't allocated
        // and free the already allocated memory
        if(A[i] == NULL){
            for(int j = 0; j < i; j++){
                free(A[j]);
            }
            free(A);
            return NULL;
        }
    }
    return A;
} 

这里有一个例子:

double**       double*           double
             -------------       ---------------------------------------------------------
   A ------> |   A[0]    | ----> | A[0][0] | A[0][1] | A[0][2] | ........ | A[0][cols-1] |
             | --------- |       ---------------------------------------------------------
             |   A[1]    | ----> | A[1][0] | A[1][1] | A[1][2] | ........ | A[1][cols-1] |
             | --------- |       ---------------------------------------------------------
             |     .     |                                    .
             |     .     |                                    .
             |     .     |                                    .
             | --------- |       ---------------------------------------------------------
             |   A[i]    | ----> | A[i][0] | A[i][1] | A[i][2] | ........ | A[i][cols-1] |
             | --------- |       ---------------------------------------------------------
             |     .     |                                    .
             |     .     |                                    .
             |     .     |                                    .
             | --------- |       ---------------------------------------------------------
             | A[rows-1] | ----> | A[rows-1][0] | A[rows-1][1] | ... | A[rows-1][cols-1] |
             -------------       ---------------------------------------------------------

The double-pointer-to-double-pointer A points to the first element A[0] of a memory block whose elements are double-pointers itself. You can imagine these double-pointers as the rows of the matrix. That's the reason why every double-pointer allocates memory for num_cols elements of type double. Furthermore A[i] points to the i-th row, i.e. A[i] points to A[i][0] and that's just the first double-element of the memory block for the i-th row. Finally, you can access the element in the i-th row and j-th column easily with A[i][j].

下面是一个完整的例子来演示它的用法:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>

/* Initializes a matrix */
double** init_matrix(int num_rows, int num_cols){
    // Allocate memory for num_rows double-pointers
    double** matrix = calloc(num_rows, sizeof(double*));
    // return NULL if the memory couldn't allocated
    if(matrix == NULL) return NULL;
    // For each double-pointer (row) allocate memory for num_cols
    // doubles
    for(int i = 0; i < num_rows; i++){
        matrix[i] = calloc(num_cols, sizeof(double));
        // return NULL if the memory couldn't allocated
        // and free the already allocated memory
        if(matrix[i] == NULL){
            for(int j = 0; j < i; j++){
                free(matrix[j]);
            }
            free(matrix);
            return NULL;
        }
    }
    return matrix;
}

/* Fills the matrix with random double-numbers between -1 and 1 */
void randn_fill_matrix(double** matrix, int rows, int cols){
    for (int i = 0; i < rows; ++i){
        for (int j = 0; j < cols; ++j){
            matrix[i][j] = (double) rand()/RAND_MAX*2.0-1.0;
        }
    }
}


/* Frees the memory allocated by the matrix */
void free_matrix(double** matrix, int rows, int cols){
    for(int i = 0; i < rows; i++){
        free(matrix[i]);
    }
    free(matrix);
}

/* Outputs the matrix to the console */
void print_matrix(double** matrix, int rows, int cols){
    for(int i = 0; i < rows; i++){
        for(int j = 0; j < cols; j++){
            printf(" %- f ", matrix[i][j]);
        }
        printf("\n");
    }
}


int main(){
    srand(time(NULL));
    int m = 3, n = 3;
    double** A = init_matrix(m, n);
    randn_fill_matrix(A, m, n);
    print_matrix(A, m, n);
    free_matrix(A, m, n);
    return 0;
}

I have used double pointers today while I was programming something for work, so I can answer why we had to use them (it's the first time I actually had to use double pointers). We had to deal with real time encoding of frames contained in buffers which are members of some structures. In the encoder we had to use a pointer to one of those structures. The problem was that our pointer was being changed to point to other structures from another thread. In order to use the current structure in the encoder, I had to use a double pointer, in order to point to the pointer that was being modified in another thread. It wasn't obvious at first, at least for us, that we had to take this approach. A lot of address were printed in the process :)).

当你处理在应用程序其他地方被更改的指针时，你应该使用双指针。在处理返回和寻址给您的硬件时，您可能还会发现双指针是必须的。

我经常使用它们的一件事是，当我有一个对象数组，我需要根据不同的字段对它们执行查找(二进制搜索)。 我保留原始数组…

int num_objects;
OBJECT *original_array = malloc(sizeof(OBJECT)*num_objects);

然后创建一个指向对象的排序指针数组。

int compare_object_by_name( const void *v1, const void *v2 ) {
  OBJECT *o1 = *(OBJECT **)v1;
  OBJECT *o2 = *(OBJECT **)v2;
  return (strcmp(o1->name, o2->name);
}

OBJECT **object_ptrs_by_name = malloc(sizeof(OBJECT *)*num_objects);
  int i = 0;
  for( ; i<num_objects; i++)
    object_ptrs_by_name[i] = original_array+i;
  qsort(object_ptrs_by_name, num_objects, sizeof(OBJECT *), compare_object_by_name);

您可以根据需要创建任意数量的已排序指针数组，然后对已排序指针数组使用二进制搜索，根据已有的数据访问所需的对象。对象的原始数组可以保持无序，但是每个指针数组将按照它们指定的字段进行排序。

1. 基本概念-

当你申报如下:-

1. Char *ch -(称为字符指针) - ch为单个字符的地址。 - (*ch)将解引用字符的值。

2. Char **ch - 'ch'包含字符指针数组的地址。(如1) '*ch'包含单个字符的地址。(注意它与1不同，因为声明不同)。 (**ch)将解引用到字符的确切值..

添加更多指针将扩展数据类型的维度，从字符扩展到字符串，再扩展到字符串数组，等等……你可以把它和一维，二维，三维矩阵联系起来。

指针的用法取决于你如何声明它。

这是一个简单的代码..

int main()
{
    char **p;
    p = (char **)malloc(100);
    p[0] = (char *)"Apple";      // or write *p, points to location of 'A'
    p[1] = (char *)"Banana";     // or write *(p+1), points to location of 'B'

    cout << *p << endl;          //Prints the first pointer location until it finds '\0'
    cout << **p << endl;         //Prints the exact character which is being pointed
    *p++;                        //Increments for the next string
    cout << *p;
}

2. 双指针的另一个应用 (这也包括引用传递)

假设您想从函数中更新一个字符。如果你尝试以下方法:-

void func(char ch)
{
    ch = 'B';
}

int main()
{
    char ptr;
    ptr = 'A';
    printf("%c", ptr);

    func(ptr);
    printf("%c\n", ptr);
}

输出为AA。这是行不通的，因为您已经将“按值传递”传递给了函数。

正确的做法是-

void func( char *ptr)        //Passed by Reference
{
    *ptr = 'B';
}

int main()
{
    char *ptr;
    ptr = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char) * 1);
    *ptr = 'A';
    printf("%c\n", *ptr);

    func(ptr);
    printf("%c\n", *ptr);
}

现在扩展这个要求，更新字符串而不是字符。 为此，需要将函数中的形参作为双指针接收。

void func(char **str)
{
    strcpy(str, "Second");
}

int main()
{
    char **str;
    // printf("%d\n", sizeof(char));
    *str = (char **)malloc(sizeof(char) * 10);          //Can hold 10 character pointers
    int i = 0;
    for(i=0;i<10;i++)
    {
        str = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char) * 1);         //Each pointer can point to a memory of 1 character.
    }

    strcpy(str, "First");
    printf("%s\n", str);
    func(str);
    printf("%s\n", str);
}

在本例中，method使用双指针作为参数来更新字符串的值。

一个原因是你想要改变传递给函数的作为函数参数的指针的值，要做到这一点，你需要指针指向指针。

简单地说，当你想在函数调用之外保留(或保留)内存分配或分配的变化时，使用**。(因此，传递带有双指针arg的函数。)

这可能不是一个很好的例子，但会告诉你基本的用法:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

void allocate(int **p)
{
    *p = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int));
}

int main()
{
    int *p = NULL;
    allocate(&p);
    *p = 42;
    printf("%d\n", *p);
    free(p);
}

Pointers to pointers also come in handy as "handles" to memory where you want to pass around a "handle" between functions to re-locatable memory. That basically means that the function can change the memory that is being pointed to by the pointer inside the handle variable, and every function or object that is using the handle will properly point to the newly relocated (or allocated) memory. Libraries like to-do this with "opaque" data-types, that is data-types were you don't have to worry about what they're doing with the memory being pointed do, you simply pass around the "handle" between the functions of the library to perform some operations on that memory ... the library functions can be allocating and de-allocating the memory under-the-hood without you having to explicitly worry about the process of memory management or where the handle is pointing.

例如:

#include <stdlib.h>

typedef unsigned char** handle_type;

//some data_structure that the library functions would work with
typedef struct 
{
    int data_a;
    int data_b;
    int data_c;
} LIB_OBJECT;

handle_type lib_create_handle()
{
    //initialize the handle with some memory that points to and array of 10 LIB_OBJECTs
    handle_type handle = malloc(sizeof(handle_type));
    *handle = malloc(sizeof(LIB_OBJECT) * 10);

    return handle;
}

void lib_func_a(handle_type handle) { /*does something with array of LIB_OBJECTs*/ }

void lib_func_b(handle_type handle)
{
    //does something that takes input LIB_OBJECTs and makes more of them, so has to
    //reallocate memory for the new objects that will be created

    //first re-allocate the memory somewhere else with more slots, but don't destroy the
    //currently allocated slots
    *handle = realloc(*handle, sizeof(LIB_OBJECT) * 20);

    //...do some operation on the new memory and return
}

void lib_func_c(handle_type handle) { /*does something else to array of LIB_OBJECTs*/ }

void lib_free_handle(handle_type handle) 
{
    free(*handle);
    free(handle); 
}


int main()
{
    //create a "handle" to some memory that the library functions can use
    handle_type my_handle = lib_create_handle();

    //do something with that memory
    lib_func_a(my_handle);

    //do something else with the handle that will make it point somewhere else
    //but that's invisible to us from the standpoint of the calling the function and
    //working with the handle
    lib_func_b(my_handle); 

    //do something with new memory chunk, but you don't have to think about the fact
    //that the memory has moved under the hood ... it's still pointed to by the "handle"
    lib_func_c(my_handle);

    //deallocate the handle
    lib_free_handle(my_handle);

    return 0;
}

希望这能有所帮助，

杰森