我想写一个函数，它以一个字母数组作为参数，并从中选择一些字母。
假设您提供了一个包含8个字母的数组，并希望从中选择3个字母。那么你应该得到:
8! / ((8 - 3)! * 3!) = 56
数组(或单词)，每个数组由3个字母组成。
当前回答
如果你可以使用SQL语法——比如，如果你使用LINQ访问一个结构或数组的字段，或者直接访问一个数据库，其中有一个名为“Alphabet”的表，只有一个字符字段“Letter”，你可以适应以下代码:
SELECT A.Letter, B.Letter, C.Letter
FROM Alphabet AS A, Alphabet AS B, Alphabet AS C
WHERE A.Letter<>B.Letter AND A.Letter<>C.Letter AND B.Letter<>C.Letter
AND A.Letter<B.Letter AND B.Letter<C.Letter
这将返回所有3个字母的组合，不管你在表格“字母表”中有多少个字母(它可以是3,8,10,27等)。
如果你想要的是所有的排列，而不是组合(也就是说，你想要“ACB”和“ABC”被视为不同的，而不是只出现一次)，只需删除最后一行(and一行)，就完成了。
Post-Edit:重新阅读问题后，我意识到需要的是通用算法，而不仅仅是选择3个项目的特定算法。Adam Hughes的答案是完整的，不幸的是我还不能投票。这个答案很简单，但只适用于你想要三样东西的时候。
其他回答
像Andrea Ambu一样用Python写的，但不是硬编码来选择三个。
def combinations(list, k):
"""Choose combinations of list, choosing k elements(no repeats)"""
if len(list) < k:
return []
else:
seq = [i for i in range(k)]
while seq:
print [list[index] for index in seq]
seq = get_next_combination(len(list), k, seq)
def get_next_combination(num_elements, k, seq):
index_to_move = find_index_to_move(num_elements, seq)
if index_to_move == None:
return None
else:
seq[index_to_move] += 1
#for every element past this sequence, move it down
for i, elem in enumerate(seq[(index_to_move+1):]):
seq[i + 1 + index_to_move] = seq[index_to_move] + i + 1
return seq
def find_index_to_move(num_elements, seq):
"""Tells which index should be moved"""
for rev_index, elem in enumerate(reversed(seq)):
if elem < (num_elements - rev_index - 1):
return len(seq) - rev_index - 1
return None
这里你有一个用c#编写的该算法的惰性评估版本:
static bool nextCombination(int[] num, int n, int k)
{
bool finished, changed;
changed = finished = false;
if (k > 0)
{
for (int i = k - 1; !finished && !changed; i--)
{
if (num[i] < (n - 1) - (k - 1) + i)
{
num[i]++;
if (i < k - 1)
{
for (int j = i + 1; j < k; j++)
{
num[j] = num[j - 1] + 1;
}
}
changed = true;
}
finished = (i == 0);
}
}
return changed;
}
static IEnumerable Combinations<T>(IEnumerable<T> elements, int k)
{
T[] elem = elements.ToArray();
int size = elem.Length;
if (k <= size)
{
int[] numbers = new int[k];
for (int i = 0; i < k; i++)
{
numbers[i] = i;
}
do
{
yield return numbers.Select(n => elem[n]);
}
while (nextCombination(numbers, size, k));
}
}
及测试部分:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int k = 3;
var t = new[] { "dog", "cat", "mouse", "zebra"};
foreach (IEnumerable<string> i in Combinations(t, k))
{
Console.WriteLine(string.Join(",", i));
}
}
希望这对你有帮助!
另一种版本，迫使所有前k个组合首先出现，然后是所有前k+1个组合，然后是所有前k+2个组合，等等。这意味着如果你对数组进行排序，最重要的在最上面，它会把它们逐渐扩展到下一个——只有在必须这样做的时候。
private static bool NextCombinationFirstsAlwaysFirst(int[] num, int n, int k)
{
if (k > 1 && NextCombinationFirstsAlwaysFirst(num, num[k - 1], k - 1))
return true;
if (num[k - 1] + 1 == n)
return false;
++num[k - 1];
for (int i = 0; i < k - 1; ++i)
num[i] = i;
return true;
}
例如，如果你在k=3, n=5上运行第一个方法("nextCombination")，你会得到:
0 1 2
0 1 3
0 1 4
0 2 3
0 2 4
0 3 4
1 2 3
1 2 4
1 3 4
2 3 4
但如果你跑
int[] nums = new int[k];
for (int i = 0; i < k; ++i)
nums[i] = i;
do
{
Console.WriteLine(string.Join(" ", nums));
}
while (NextCombinationFirstsAlwaysFirst(nums, n, k));
你会得到这个(为了清晰起见，我添加了空行):
0 1 2
0 1 3
0 2 3
1 2 3
0 1 4
0 2 4
1 2 4
0 3 4
1 3 4
2 3 4
它只在必须添加时才添加“4”，而且在添加“4”之后，它只在必须添加时再添加“3”(在执行01、02、12之后)。
我有一个用于project euler的排列算法，用python编写:
def missing(miss,src):
"Returns the list of items in src not present in miss"
return [i for i in src if i not in miss]
def permutation_gen(n,l):
"Generates all the permutations of n items of the l list"
for i in l:
if n<=1: yield [i]
r = [i]
for j in permutation_gen(n-1,missing([i],l)): yield r+j
If
n<len(l)
你应该有所有你需要的组合，没有重复，你需要吗?
它是一个生成器，所以你可以这样使用它:
for comb in permutation_gen(3,list("ABCDEFGH")):
print comb
另一种python递归解决方案。
def combination_indicies(n, k, j = 0, stack = []):
if len(stack) == k:
yield list(stack)
return
for i in range(j, n):
stack.append(i)
for x in combination_indicies(n, k, i + 1, stack):
yield x
stack.pop()
list(combination_indicies(5, 3))
输出:
[[0, 1, 2],
[0, 1, 3],
[0, 1, 4],
[0, 2, 3],
[0, 2, 4],
[0, 3, 4],
[1, 2, 3],
[1, 2, 4],
[1, 3, 4],
[2, 3, 4]]
Lisp宏为所有值r(每次取)生成代码
(defmacro txaat (some-list taken-at-a-time)
(let* ((vars (reverse (truncate-list '(a b c d e f g h i j) taken-at-a-time))))
`(
,@(loop for i below taken-at-a-time
for j in vars
with nested = nil
finally (return nested)
do
(setf
nested
`(loop for ,j from
,(if (< i (1- (length vars)))
`(1+ ,(nth (1+ i) vars))
0)
below (- (length ,some-list) ,i)
,@(if (equal i 0)
`(collect
(list
,@(loop for k from (1- taken-at-a-time) downto 0
append `((nth ,(nth k vars) ,some-list)))))
`(append ,nested))))))))
So,
CL-USER> (macroexpand-1 '(txaat '(a b c d) 1))
(LOOP FOR A FROM 0 TO (- (LENGTH '(A B C D)) 1)
COLLECT (LIST (NTH A '(A B C D))))
T
CL-USER> (macroexpand-1 '(txaat '(a b c d) 2))
(LOOP FOR A FROM 0 TO (- (LENGTH '(A B C D)) 2)
APPEND (LOOP FOR B FROM (1+ A) TO (- (LENGTH '(A B C D)) 1)
COLLECT (LIST (NTH A '(A B C D)) (NTH B '(A B C D)))))
T
CL-USER> (macroexpand-1 '(txaat '(a b c d) 3))
(LOOP FOR A FROM 0 TO (- (LENGTH '(A B C D)) 3)
APPEND (LOOP FOR B FROM (1+ A) TO (- (LENGTH '(A B C D)) 2)
APPEND (LOOP FOR C FROM (1+ B) TO (- (LENGTH '(A B C D)) 1)
COLLECT (LIST (NTH A '(A B C D))
(NTH B '(A B C D))
(NTH C '(A B C D))))))
T
CL-USER>
And,
CL-USER> (txaat '(a b c d) 1)
((A) (B) (C) (D))
CL-USER> (txaat '(a b c d) 2)
((A B) (A C) (A D) (B C) (B D) (C D))
CL-USER> (txaat '(a b c d) 3)
((A B C) (A B D) (A C D) (B C D))
CL-USER> (txaat '(a b c d) 4)
((A B C D))
CL-USER> (txaat '(a b c d) 5)
NIL
CL-USER> (txaat '(a b c d) 0)
NIL
CL-USER>
