我发现这个线程很有用，我想我会添加一个Javascript解决方案，你可以弹出到Firebug。取决于你的JS引擎，如果起始字符串很大，可能会花一点时间。

function string_recurse(active, rest) {
    if (rest.length == 0) {
        console.log(active);
    } else {
        string_recurse(active + rest.charAt(0), rest.substring(1, rest.length));
        string_recurse(active, rest.substring(1, rest.length));
    }
}
string_recurse("", "abc");

输出如下:

abc
ab
ac
a
bc
b
c

这里你有一个用c#编写的该算法的惰性评估版本:

    static bool nextCombination(int[] num, int n, int k)
    {
        bool finished, changed;

        changed = finished = false;

        if (k > 0)
        {
            for (int i = k - 1; !finished && !changed; i--)
            {
                if (num[i] < (n - 1) - (k - 1) + i)
                {
                    num[i]++;
                    if (i < k - 1)
                    {
                        for (int j = i + 1; j < k; j++)
                        {
                            num[j] = num[j - 1] + 1;
                        }
                    }
                    changed = true;
                }
                finished = (i == 0);
            }
        }

        return changed;
    }

    static IEnumerable Combinations<T>(IEnumerable<T> elements, int k)
    {
        T[] elem = elements.ToArray();
        int size = elem.Length;

        if (k <= size)
        {
            int[] numbers = new int[k];
            for (int i = 0; i < k; i++)
            {
                numbers[i] = i;
            }

            do
            {
                yield return numbers.Select(n => elem[n]);
            }
            while (nextCombination(numbers, size, k));
        }
    }

及测试部分:

    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        int k = 3;
        var t = new[] { "dog", "cat", "mouse", "zebra"};

        foreach (IEnumerable<string> i in Combinations(t, k))
        {
            Console.WriteLine(string.Join(",", i));
        }
    }

希望这对你有帮助!

另一种版本，迫使所有前k个组合首先出现，然后是所有前k+1个组合，然后是所有前k+2个组合，等等。这意味着如果你对数组进行排序，最重要的在最上面，它会把它们逐渐扩展到下一个——只有在必须这样做的时候。

private static bool NextCombinationFirstsAlwaysFirst(int[] num, int n, int k)
{
    if (k > 1 && NextCombinationFirstsAlwaysFirst(num, num[k - 1], k - 1))
        return true;

    if (num[k - 1] + 1 == n)
        return false;

    ++num[k - 1];
    for (int i = 0; i < k - 1; ++i)
        num[i] = i;

    return true;
}

例如，如果你在k=3, n=5上运行第一个方法("nextCombination")，你会得到:

0 1 2
0 1 3
0 1 4
0 2 3
0 2 4
0 3 4
1 2 3
1 2 4
1 3 4
2 3 4

但如果你跑

int[] nums = new int[k];
for (int i = 0; i < k; ++i)
    nums[i] = i;
do
{
    Console.WriteLine(string.Join(" ", nums));
}
while (NextCombinationFirstsAlwaysFirst(nums, n, k));

你会得到这个(为了清晰起见，我添加了空行):

0 1 2

0 1 3
0 2 3
1 2 3

0 1 4
0 2 4
1 2 4
0 3 4
1 3 4
2 3 4

它只在必须添加时才添加“4”，而且在添加“4”之后，它只在必须添加时再添加“3”(在执行01、02、12之后)。

赶时髦，发布另一个解决方案。这是一个通用的Java实现。输入:(int k)是要选择的元素数量，(List<T> List)是要选择的列表。返回一个组合列表(list < list <T>>)。

public static <T> List<List<T>> getCombinations(int k, List<T> list) {
    List<List<T>> combinations = new ArrayList<List<T>>();
    if (k == 0) {
        combinations.add(new ArrayList<T>());
        return combinations;
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
        T element = list.get(i);
        List<T> rest = getSublist(list, i+1);
        for (List<T> previous : getCombinations(k-1, rest)) {
            previous.add(element);
            combinations.add(previous);
        }
    }
    return combinations;
}

public static <T> List<T> getSublist(List<T> list, int i) {
    List<T> sublist = new ArrayList<T>();
    for (int j = i; j < list.size(); j++) {
        sublist.add(list.get(j));
    }
    return sublist;
}

我知道这个问题已经有很多答案了，但我想在JavaScript中添加我自己的贡献，它由两个函数组成——一个生成原始n元素集的所有可能不同的k子集，另一个使用第一个函数生成原始n元素集的幂集。

下面是这两个函数的代码:

//Generate combination subsets from a base set of elements (passed as an array). This function should generate an
//array containing nCr elements, where nCr = n!/[r! (n-r)!].

//Arguments:

//[1] baseSet :     The base set to create the subsets from (e.g., ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f"])
//[2] cnt :         The number of elements each subset is to contain (e.g., 3)

function MakeCombinationSubsets(baseSet, cnt)
{
    var bLen = baseSet.length;
    var indices = [];
    var subSet = [];
    var done = false;
    var result = [];        //Contains all the combination subsets generated
    var done = false;
    var i = 0;
    var idx = 0;
    var tmpIdx = 0;
    var incr = 0;
    var test = 0;
    var newIndex = 0;
    var inBounds = false;
    var tmpIndices = [];
    var checkBounds = false;

    //First, generate an array whose elements are indices into the base set ...

    for (i=0; i<cnt; i++)

        indices.push(i);

    //Now create a clone of this array, to be used in the loop itself ...

        tmpIndices = [];

        tmpIndices = tmpIndices.concat(indices);

    //Now initialise the loop ...

    idx = cnt - 1;      //point to the last element of the indices array
    incr = 0;
    done = false;
    while (!done)
    {
    //Create the current subset ...

        subSet = [];    //Make sure we begin with a completely empty subset before continuing ...

        for (i=0; i<cnt; i++)

            subSet.push(baseSet[tmpIndices[i]]);    //Create the current subset, using items selected from the
                                                    //base set, using the indices array (which will change as we
                                                    //continue scanning) ...

    //Add the subset thus created to the result set ...

        result.push(subSet);

    //Now update the indices used to select the elements of the subset. At the start, idx will point to the
    //rightmost index in the indices array, but the moment that index moves out of bounds with respect to the
    //base set, attention will be shifted to the next left index.

        test = tmpIndices[idx] + 1;

        if (test >= bLen)
        {
        //Here, we're about to move out of bounds with respect to the base set. We therefore need to scan back,
        //and update indices to the left of the current one. Find the leftmost index in the indices array that
        //isn't going to  move out of bounds with respect to the base set ...

            tmpIdx = idx - 1;
            incr = 1;

            inBounds = false;       //Assume at start that the index we're checking in the loop below is out of bounds
            checkBounds = true;

            while (checkBounds)
            {
                if (tmpIdx < 0)
                {
                    checkBounds = false;    //Exit immediately at this point
                }
                else
                {
                    newIndex = tmpIndices[tmpIdx] + 1;
                    test = newIndex + incr;

                    if (test >= bLen)
                    {
                    //Here, incrementing the current selected index will take that index out of bounds, so
                    //we move on to the next index to the left ...

                        tmpIdx--;
                        incr++;
                    }
                    else
                    {
                    //Here, the index will remain in bounds if we increment it, so we
                    //exit the loop and signal that we're in bounds ...

                        inBounds = true;
                        checkBounds = false;

                    //End if/else
                    }

                //End if 
                }               
            //End while
            }
    //At this point, if we'er still in bounds, then we continue generating subsets, but if not, we abort immediately.

            if (!inBounds)
                done = true;
            else
            {
            //Here, we're still in bounds. We need to update the indices accordingly. NOTE: at this point, although a
            //left positioned index in the indices array may still be in bounds, incrementing it to generate indices to
            //the right may take those indices out of bounds. We therefore need to check this as we perform the index
            //updating of the indices array.

                tmpIndices[tmpIdx] = newIndex;

                inBounds = true;
                checking = true;
                i = tmpIdx + 1;

                while (checking)
                {
                    test = tmpIndices[i - 1] + 1;   //Find out if incrementing the left adjacent index takes it out of bounds

                    if (test >= bLen)
                    {
                        inBounds = false;           //If we move out of bounds, exit NOW ...
                        checking = false;
                    }
                    else
                    {
                        tmpIndices[i] = test;       //Otherwise, update the indices array ...

                        i++;                        //Now move on to the next index to the right in the indices array ...

                        checking = (i < cnt);       //And continue until we've exhausted all the indices array elements ...
                    //End if/else
                    }
                //End while
                }
                //At this point, if the above updating of the indices array has moved any of its elements out of bounds,
                //we abort subset construction from this point ...
                if (!inBounds)
                    done = true;
            //End if/else
            }
        }
        else
        {
        //Here, the rightmost index under consideration isn't moving out of bounds with respect to the base set when
        //we increment it, so we simply increment and continue the loop ...
            tmpIndices[idx] = test;
        //End if
        }
    //End while
    }
    return(result);
//End function
}


function MakePowerSet(baseSet)
{
    var bLen = baseSet.length;
    var result = [];
    var i = 0;
    var partialSet = [];

    result.push([]);    //add the empty set to the power set

    for (i=1; i<bLen; i++)
    {
        partialSet = MakeCombinationSubsets(baseSet, i);
        result = result.concat(partialSet);
    //End i loop
    }
    //Now, finally, add the base set itself to the power set to make it complete ...

    partialSet = [];
    partialSet.push(baseSet);
    result = result.concat(partialSet);

    return(result);
    //End function
}

我用集合["a"， "b"， "c"， "d"， "e"， "f"]作为基本集进行了测试，并运行代码以产生以下幂集:

[]
["a"]
["b"]
["c"]
["d"]
["e"]
["f"]
["a","b"]
["a","c"]
["a","d"]
["a","e"]
["a","f"]
["b","c"]
["b","d"]
["b","e"]
["b","f"]
["c","d"]
["c","e"]
["c","f"]
["d","e"]
["d","f"]
["e","f"]
["a","b","c"]
["a","b","d"]
["a","b","e"]
["a","b","f"]
["a","c","d"]
["a","c","e"]
["a","c","f"]
["a","d","e"]
["a","d","f"]
["a","e","f"]
["b","c","d"]
["b","c","e"]
["b","c","f"]
["b","d","e"]
["b","d","f"]
["b","e","f"]
["c","d","e"]
["c","d","f"]
["c","e","f"]
["d","e","f"]
["a","b","c","d"]
["a","b","c","e"]
["a","b","c","f"]
["a","b","d","e"]
["a","b","d","f"]
["a","b","e","f"]
["a","c","d","e"]
["a","c","d","f"]
["a","c","e","f"]
["a","d","e","f"]
["b","c","d","e"]
["b","c","d","f"]
["b","c","e","f"]
["b","d","e","f"]
["c","d","e","f"]
["a","b","c","d","e"]
["a","b","c","d","f"]
["a","b","c","e","f"]
["a","b","d","e","f"]
["a","c","d","e","f"]
["b","c","d","e","f"]
["a","b","c","d","e","f"]

只要复制粘贴这两个函数“原样”，你就有了提取n元素集的不同k子集所需的基本知识，并生成该n元素集的幂集(如果你愿意的话)。

我并不是说这很优雅，只是说它在经过大量的测试(并在调试阶段将空气变为蓝色:)之后可以工作。

这是一个c++解决方案，我提出使用递归和位移位。它也可以在C语言中工作。

void r_nCr(unsigned int startNum, unsigned int bitVal, unsigned int testNum) // Should be called with arguments (2^r)-1, 2^(r-1), 2^(n-1)
{
    unsigned int n = (startNum - bitVal) << 1;
    n += bitVal ? 1 : 0;

    for (unsigned int i = log2(testNum) + 1; i > 0; i--) // Prints combination as a series of 1s and 0s
        cout << (n >> (i - 1) & 1);
    cout << endl;

    if (!(n & testNum) && n != startNum)
        r_nCr(n, bitVal, testNum);

    if (bitVal && bitVal < testNum)
        r_nCr(startNum, bitVal >> 1, testNum);
}

你可以在这里找到这是如何工作的解释。

最近在IronScripter网站上有一个PowerShell挑战，需要一个n- choice -k的解决方案。我在那里发布了一个解决方案，但这里有一个更通用的版本。

AllK开关用于控制输出是长度为ChooseK的组合，还是长度为1到ChooseK的组合。 Prefix参数实际上是输出字符串的累加器，但其效果是为初始调用传递的值实际上会为每一行输出添加前缀。

function Get-NChooseK
{

    [CmdletBinding()]

    Param
    (

        [String[]]
        $ArrayN

    ,   [Int]
        $ChooseK

    ,   [Switch]
        $AllK

    ,   [String]
        $Prefix = ''

    )

    PROCESS
    {
        # Validate the inputs
        $ArrayN = $ArrayN | Sort-Object -Unique

        If ($ChooseK -gt $ArrayN.Length)
        {
            Write-Error "Can't choose $ChooseK items when only $($ArrayN.Length) are available." -ErrorAction Stop
        }

        # Control the output
        $firstK = If ($AllK) { 1 } Else { $ChooseK }

        # Get combinations
        $firstK..$ChooseK | ForEach-Object {

            $thisK = $_

            $ArrayN[0..($ArrayN.Length-($thisK--))] | ForEach-Object {
                If ($thisK -eq 0)
                {
                    Write-Output ($Prefix+$_)
                }
                Else
                {
                    Get-NChooseK -Array ($ArrayN[($ArrayN.IndexOf($_)+1)..($ArrayN.Length-1)]) -Choose $thisK -AllK:$false -Prefix ($Prefix+$_)
                }
            }

        }
    }

}

例如:

PS C:\>$ArrayN  = 'E','B','C','A','D'
PS C:\>$ChooseK = 3
PS C:\>Get-NChooseK -ArrayN $ArrayN -ChooseK $ChooseK
ABC
ABD
ABE
ACD
ACE
ADE
BCD
BCE
BDE
CDE