非常棒的答案和例子!

我想补充一下两者之间的根本区别，

像==这样的操作符不是多态的，而Equals是

记住这个概念，如果你算出任何例子(通过查看左手和右手引用类型，并检查/知道类型是否确实重载了==操作符和重写了Equals)，你肯定会得到正确的答案。

当比较对象引用和字符串时(即使对象引用引用了字符串)，特定于字符串类的==操作符的特殊行为将被忽略。

Normally (when not dealing with strings, that is), Equals compares values, while == compares object references. If two objects you are comparing are referring to the same exact instance of an object, then both will return true, but if one has the same content and came from a different source (is a separate instance with the same data), only Equals will return true. However, as noted in the comments, string is a special case because it overrides the == operator so that when dealing purely with string references (and not object references), only the values are compared even if they are separate instances. The following code illustrates the subtle differences in behaviors:

string s1 = "test";
string s2 = "test";
string s3 = "test1".Substring(0, 4);
object s4 = s3;  // Notice: set to object variable!

Console.WriteLine($"{object.ReferenceEquals(s1, s2)} {s1 == s2} {s1.Equals(s2)}");
Console.WriteLine($"{object.ReferenceEquals(s1, s3)} {s1 == s3} {s1.Equals(s3)}");
Console.WriteLine($"{object.ReferenceEquals(s1, s4)} {s1 == s4} {s1.Equals(s4)}");

输出结果为:

True True True     // s1, s2
False True True    // s1, s3
False False True   // s1, s4

简介:

首先，两者有区别。对数字的

> 2 == 2.0
True

> 2.Equals(2.0)
False

对于字符串

> string x = null;
> x == null
True

> x.Equals(null)
NullReferenceException

在这两种情况下，==比.Equals更有用

The == token in C# is used for two different equality-check operators. When the compiler encounters that token, it will check whether either of the types being compared has implemented an equality-operator overload for either the specific combination types being compared(*), or for a combination of types to which both types can be converted. If the compiler finds such an overload it will use it. Otherwise, if the two types are both reference types and they are not unrelated classes (either may be an interface, or they may be related classes), the compiler will regard == as a reference-comparison operator. If neither condition applies, compilation will fail.

请注意，其他一些语言为两个相等检查操作符使用单独的令牌。在VB。例如，=令牌在表达式中仅用于可重载的相等检查操作符，而is则用作引用测试或空测试操作符。在没有覆盖相等检查操作符的类型上使用=将会失败，在测试引用是否相等或为空之外的任何目的上尝试使用Is也会失败。

(*)Types generally only overload equality for comparison with themselves, but it may be useful for types to overload the equality operator for comparison with other particular types; for example, int could have (and IMHO should have but didn't) defined an equality operators for comparison with float, so that 16777217 would not report itself equal to 16777216f. As it is, since no such operator is defined, C# will promote the int to float, rounding it to 16777216f before the equality-check operator sees it; that operator then sees two equal floating-point numbers and reports them as equal, unaware of the rounding that took place.

这是由于值相等(equal方法)和引用相等(==运算符)，因为equal方法检查值，而相同的==检查引用。

==运算符覆盖https://referencesource.microsoft.com/上string类内可用的代码

现在更容易理解了，equal方法也有两个实现一个来自string类本身，一个来自object类。它对性能的影响以及我也运行一些基本的代码，并试图理解基准测试。

我分享下面的结果，如果我错了，请纠正或建议。有3种情况，我对所有情况运行了相同的代码，这就是结果。

情况1:这里我使用的是字符串。相等的方法比较两个字符串和两个字符串有相同的值。string.equals (a, b)

第一次运行:5608195 tick

第二次运行:5529387个刻度

第三次运行:5622569滴答

总蜱数:16760151

情况2:这里我使用的是字符串。Equal()方法(重载的一个)用于比较两个字符串，并且两个字符串具有相同的值。 a.equals (b)

第一次运行:6738583滴答

第二轮:6452927

第三轮:7168897个刻度

总蜱虫= 20360407

情况3:这里我使用==操作符比较2个字符串，两个字符串都有相同的值。 a = =

第一次运行:6652151滴答

第二次运行:7514300个tick

第三轮:7634606滴答

总蜱虫= 21801057

class Program
{
    private static int count;
    static string a = "abcdef";
    static string b = "abcdef";
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {            

        for (int j = 1; j <= 3; j++)
        {
            Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
            sw.Start();
            for (int i = 1; i <= 1000; i++)
            {
                checkString();
            }
            sw.Stop();
            Console.WriteLine(sw.ElapsedTicks);
        }
        Console.ReadLine();

    }
    public static void checkString()
    {
        for (int i = 1; i <= 100000; i++)
        {
            if (a==b)
                count++;
        }
    }
}

I am a bit confused here. If the runtime type of Content is of type string, then both == and Equals should return true. However, since this does not appear to be the case, then runtime type of Content is not string and calling Equals on it is doing a referential equality and this explains why Equals("Energy Attack") fails. However, in the second case, the decision as to which overloaded == static operator should be called is made at compile time and this decision appears to be ==(string,string). this suggests to me that Content provides an implicit conversion to string.