我在silverlight应用程序中有一个比较2个字符串的条件，由于某种原因，当我使用==时，它返回false而. equals()返回true。
代码如下:
if (((ListBoxItem)lstBaseMenu.SelectedItem).Content.Equals("Energy Attack"))
{
// Execute code
}
if (((ListBoxItem)lstBaseMenu.SelectedItem).Content == "Energy Attack")
{
// Execute code
}
你知道为什么会这样吗?
当前回答
Equals()和==是否相同取决于实现。因为c#允许用户分别为Equals()和==设置不同的行为。
class CompareTest
{
public readonly int val;
public CompareTest(int val)
{
this.val = val;
}
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
return obj is CompareTest test && this.val == test.val;
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return val;
}
public static bool operator == (CompareTest a, object b)
{
return Equals(a, b);
}
public static bool operator != (CompareTest a, object b)
{
return !(a == b);
}
}
在本例中，我使Equals()和==具有相同的行为。但如果我让他们不一样呢?例如:
public static bool operator == (CompareTest a, object b)
{
return false;
}
Equals()正常工作，但==永远不会工作。
此外，虽然我让它们具有相同的行为，但仍然有一个区别:哪个==函数将被调用取决于左边的值:
Compare Test a = new CompareTest(1);
object b = new CompareTest(1);
CompareTest c = new CompareTest(1);
Debug.Log("AB " + (a == b)); // true
Debug.Log("BA " + (b == a)); // false! because it calls object's == function
Debug.Log("AC " + (a == c)); // true
Debug.Log("CA " + (c == a)); // true
其他回答
给答案再加一分。
. equalsto()方法提供了比较区域性和区分大小写的方法。
据我所知，答案很简单:
==比较对象引用。 . equals比较对象内容。 字符串数据类型的作用总是类似于内容比较。
我希望我是对的，这回答了你的问题。
Equals()和==是否相同取决于实现。因为c#允许用户分别为Equals()和==设置不同的行为。
class CompareTest
{
public readonly int val;
public CompareTest(int val)
{
this.val = val;
}
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
return obj is CompareTest test && this.val == test.val;
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return val;
}
public static bool operator == (CompareTest a, object b)
{
return Equals(a, b);
}
public static bool operator != (CompareTest a, object b)
{
return !(a == b);
}
}
在本例中，我使Equals()和==具有相同的行为。但如果我让他们不一样呢?例如:
public static bool operator == (CompareTest a, object b)
{
return false;
}
Equals()正常工作，但==永远不会工作。
此外，虽然我让它们具有相同的行为，但仍然有一个区别:哪个==函数将被调用取决于左边的值:
Compare Test a = new CompareTest(1);
object b = new CompareTest(1);
CompareTest c = new CompareTest(1);
Debug.Log("AB " + (a == b)); // true
Debug.Log("BA " + (b == a)); // false! because it calls object's == function
Debug.Log("AC " + (a == c)); // true
Debug.Log("CA " + (c == a)); // true
I am a bit confused here. If the runtime type of Content is of type string, then both == and Equals should return true. However, since this does not appear to be the case, then runtime type of Content is not string and calling Equals on it is doing a referential equality and this explains why Equals("Energy Attack") fails. However, in the second case, the decision as to which overloaded == static operator should be called is made at compile time and this decision appears to be ==(string,string). this suggests to me that Content provides an implicit conversion to string.
@BlueMonkMN早前的回答还有另一个层面。额外的维度是，@Drahcir的标题问题的答案也取决于我们如何得到字符串值。说明:
string s1 = "test";
string s2 = "test";
string s3 = "test1".Substring(0, 4);
object s4 = s3;
string s5 = "te" + "st";
object s6 = s5;
Console.WriteLine("{0} {1} {2}", object.ReferenceEquals(s1, s2), s1 == s2, s1.Equals(s2));
Console.WriteLine("\n Case1 - A method changes the value:");
Console.WriteLine("{0} {1} {2}", object.ReferenceEquals(s1, s3), s1 == s3, s1.Equals(s3));
Console.WriteLine("{0} {1} {2}", object.ReferenceEquals(s1, s4), s1 == s4, s1.Equals(s4));
Console.WriteLine("\n Case2 - Having only literals allows to arrive at a literal:");
Console.WriteLine("{0} {1} {2}", object.ReferenceEquals(s1, s5), s1 == s5, s1.Equals(s5));
Console.WriteLine("{0} {1} {2}", object.ReferenceEquals(s1, s6), s1 == s6, s1.Equals(s6));
输出结果为:
True True True
Case1 - A method changes the value:
False True True
False False True
Case2 - Having only literals allows to arrive at a literal:
True True True
True True True
