这是因为泛型是在他们创建后才添加到java的，所以它有点笨拙，因为java的原始创造者认为在创建数组时，类型应该在创建时指定。这对泛型不起作用，所以你必须这么做 E[] array=(E[]) new Object[15]; 这将编译，但会给出警告。

试试这个:

List<?>[] arrayOfLists = new List<?>[4];

肯定有一个好方法(可能是使用反射)，因为在我看来，这正是数组列表。toArray(T[] a)可以。我引用:

public <T> T[] toArray(T[] a) 返回一个数组，其中包含所有 此列表中的元素按正确顺序排列;的运行时类型 返回的数组是指定数组的数组。如果列表符合 指定的数组，则在其中返回。否则，新数组为 的运行时类型分配 这个列表。

因此，一种方法是使用这个函数，即创建一个数组中你想要的对象的数组列表，然后使用toArray(T[] a)来创建实际的数组。不会很快，但你没提你的要求。

有人知道toArray(T[] a)是如何实现的吗?

主要原因是Java中的数组是协变的。

这里有一个很好的概述。

引用:

Arrays of generic types are not allowed because they're not sound. The problem is due to the interaction of Java arrays, which are not statically sound but are dynamically checked, with generics, which are statically sound and not dynamically checked. Here is how you could exploit the loophole: class Box<T> { final T x; Box(T x) { this.x = x; } } class Loophole { public static void main(String[] args) { Box<String>[] bsa = new Box<String>[3]; Object[] oa = bsa; oa[0] = new Box<Integer>(3); // error not caught by array store check String s = bsa[0].x; // BOOM! } } We had proposed to resolve this problem using statically safe arrays (aka Variance) bute that was rejected for Tiger. -- gafter

(我相信是尼尔·盖特，但不确定)

在这里查看上下文:http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=457033&forumID=316

Oracle教程:

You cannot create arrays of parameterized types. For example, the following code does not compile: List<Integer>[] arrayOfLists = new List<Integer>[2]; // compile-time error The following code illustrates what happens when different types are inserted into an array: Object[] strings = new String[2]; strings[0] = "hi"; // OK strings[1] = 100; // An ArrayStoreException is thrown. If you try the same thing with a generic list, there would be a problem: Object[] stringLists = new List<String>[]; // compiler error, but pretend it's allowed stringLists[0] = new ArrayList<String>(); // OK stringLists[1] = new ArrayList<Integer>(); // An ArrayStoreException should be thrown, // but the runtime can't detect it. If arrays of parameterized lists were allowed, the previous code would fail to throw the desired ArrayStoreException.

对我来说，这听起来很软弱。我认为任何对泛型有充分理解的人，都完全可以理解，甚至期望，在这种情况下ArrayStoredException不会被抛出。