最好使用这个:

fn print_type_of<T>(_: &T) -> String {
    format!("{}", std::any::type_name::<T>())
}

fn main() {
    let s = &"hello world".to_string();
    let cloned_s = s.clone();
    println!("{:?}", print_type_of(&s));
    println!("{:?}", print_type_of(&cloned_s));
}

来自https://stackoverflow.com/a/29168659/6774636的推论

宏形式允许使用“无处不在”，而函数需要一个对象来解析。

宏表单(一行):

macro_rules! ty {($type:ty) => {std::any::type_name::<$type>()}}

形成的宏观形式:

macro_rules! ty {
    ($type:ty) => {
        std::any::type_name::<$type>()
    };
}

函数形式(借用是为了不破坏已解析的变量):

fn type_of<T>(_: &T) -> &'static str {std::any::type_name::<T>()}

fn type_of<T>(_: &T) -> &'static str {
    std::any::type_name::<T>()
}

例子:

macro_rules! ty {($type:ty) => {std::any::type_name::<$type>()}}
fn type_of<T>(_: &T) -> &'static str {std::any::type_name::<T>()}

struct DontMater<T>(T);

impl<T: std::fmt::Debug> std::fmt::Debug for DontMater<T> {
    fn fmt(&self, fmt: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
        fmt.write_fmt(format_args!("DontMater<{}>({:?})", ty!(T), self.0))
    }
}

fn main() {
    type µ = [Vec<String>; 7];
    println!("{:?}", DontMater(5_usize));
    println!("{:?}", DontMater("¤"));
    println!("{}", ty!(char));
    println!("{:?}", ty!(µ));
    println!("{}", type_of(&DontMater(72_i8)));
    println!("{:?}", type_of(&15_f64));
}

返回:

DontMater<usize>(5)
DontMater<&str>("¤")
char
"[alloc::vec::Vec<alloc::string::String>; 7]"
env_vars::DontMater<i8>
"f64"

如果你事先知道所有的类型，你可以使用trait来添加type_of方法:

trait TypeInfo {
    fn type_of(&self) -> &'static str;
}

impl TypeInfo for i32 {
    fn type_of(&self) -> &'static str {
        "i32"
    }
}

impl TypeInfo for i64 {
    fn type_of(&self) -> &'static str {
        "i64"
    }
}

//...

没有复杂或什么都没有，所以尽管有更多的限制，这是唯一的解决方案，让你得到一个字符串，是稳定的。(参见Boiethios的回答)然而，这是非常费力的，并且没有考虑类型参数，所以我们可以……

trait TypeInfo {
    fn type_name() -> String;
    fn type_of(&self) -> String;
}

macro_rules! impl_type_info {
    ($($name:ident$(<$($T:ident),+>)*),*) => {
        $(impl_type_info_single!($name$(<$($T),*>)*);)*
    };
}

macro_rules! mut_if {
    ($name:ident = $value:expr, $($any:expr)+) => (let mut $name = $value;);
    ($name:ident = $value:expr,) => (let $name = $value;);
}

macro_rules! impl_type_info_single {
    ($name:ident$(<$($T:ident),+>)*) => {
        impl$(<$($T: TypeInfo),*>)* TypeInfo for $name$(<$($T),*>)* {
            fn type_name() -> String {
                mut_if!(res = String::from(stringify!($name)), $($($T)*)*);
                $(
                    res.push('<');
                    $(
                        res.push_str(&$T::type_name());
                        res.push(',');
                    )*
                    res.pop();
                    res.push('>');
                )*
                res
            }
            fn type_of(&self) -> String {
                $name$(::<$($T),*>)*::type_name()
            }
        }
    }
}

impl<'a, T: TypeInfo + ?Sized> TypeInfo for &'a T {
    fn type_name() -> String {
        let mut res = String::from("&");
        res.push_str(&T::type_name());
        res
    }
    fn type_of(&self) -> String {
        <&T>::type_name()
    }
}

impl<'a, T: TypeInfo + ?Sized> TypeInfo for &'a mut T {
    fn type_name() -> String {
        let mut res = String::from("&mut ");
        res.push_str(&T::type_name());
        res
    }
    fn type_of(&self) -> String {
        <&mut T>::type_name()
    }
}

macro_rules! type_of {
    ($x:expr) => { (&$x).type_of() };
}

让我们使用它:

impl_type_info!(i32, i64, f32, f64, str, String, Vec<T>, Result<T,S>)

fn main() {
    println!("{}", type_of!(1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&&1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&mut 1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&&mut 1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&mut &1));
    println!("{}", type_of!(1.0));
    println!("{}", type_of!("abc"));
    println!("{}", type_of!(&"abc"));
    println!("{}", type_of!(String::from("abc")));
    println!("{}", type_of!(vec![1,2,3]));

    println!("{}", <Result<String,i64>>::type_name());
    println!("{}", <&i32>::type_name());
    println!("{}", <&str>::type_name());
}

输出:

i32
&i32
&&i32
&mut i32
&&mut i32
&mut &i32
f64
&str
&&str
String
Vec<i32>
Result<String,i64>
&i32
&str

生锈的操场

有一个不稳定的函数std::intrinsic::type_name可以获取类型的名称，尽管您必须使用Rust的夜间构建(这在稳定的Rust中不太可能工作)。这里有一个例子:

#![feature(core_intrinsics)]

fn print_type_of<T>(_: &T) {
    println!("{}", unsafe { std::intrinsics::type_name::<T>() });
}

fn main() {
    print_type_of(&32.90);          // prints "f64"
    print_type_of(&vec![1, 2, 4]);  // prints "std::vec::Vec<i32>"
    print_type_of(&"foo");          // prints "&str"
}

1.38版新增std::any::type_name

use std::any::type_name;

fn type_of<T>(_: T) -> &'static str {
    type_name::<T>()
}
fn main() {
    let x = 21;
    let y = 2.5;
    println!("{}", type_of(&y));
    println!("{}", type_of(x));
}

我非常喜欢@Coautose之前的回答，但如果有人只想要没有名称空间的类型名称，例如C而不是a::b::C，这里是一个修改后的宏版本，看起来像预期的那样工作:

macro_rules! ty {
    ($type:ty) => {{
        let result = std::any::type_name::<$type>();
        match result.rsplit_once(':') {
            Some((_, s)) => s,
            None => result,
        }
    }};
}

用法:

debug!("Testing type name: {}", ty!(A));