我研究了其中一些样本，发现它们在某些情况下是缺乏的。这个版本适用于所有类型的泛型:类型、接口及其类型定义。

public static bool InheritsOrImplements(this Type child, Type parent)
{
    parent = ResolveGenericTypeDefinition(parent);

    var currentChild = child.IsGenericType
                           ? child.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                           : child;

    while (currentChild != typeof (object))
    {
        if (parent == currentChild || HasAnyInterfaces(parent, currentChild))
            return true;

        currentChild = currentChild.BaseType != null
                       && currentChild.BaseType.IsGenericType
                           ? currentChild.BaseType.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                           : currentChild.BaseType;

        if (currentChild == null)
            return false;
    }
    return false;
}

private static bool HasAnyInterfaces(Type parent, Type child)
{
    return child.GetInterfaces()
        .Any(childInterface =>
        {
            var currentInterface = childInterface.IsGenericType
                ? childInterface.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                : childInterface;

            return currentInterface == parent;
        });
}

private static Type ResolveGenericTypeDefinition(Type parent)
{
    var shouldUseGenericType = true;
    if (parent.IsGenericType && parent.GetGenericTypeDefinition() != parent)
        shouldUseGenericType = false;

    if (parent.IsGenericType && shouldUseGenericType)
        parent = parent.GetGenericTypeDefinition();
    return parent;
}

下面是单元测试:

protected interface IFooInterface
{
}

protected interface IGenericFooInterface<T>
{
}

protected class FooBase
{
}

protected class FooImplementor
    : FooBase, IFooInterface
{
}

protected class GenericFooBase
    : FooImplementor, IGenericFooInterface<object>
{

}

protected class GenericFooImplementor<T>
    : FooImplementor, IGenericFooInterface<T>
{
}


[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_non_generic_interface()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IFooInterface)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooBase)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface_by_generic_subclass()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface_by_generic_subclass_not_caring_about_generic_type_parameter()
{
    Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_not_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface_by_generic_subclass_not_caring_about_generic_type_parameter()
{
    Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<int>)), Is.False);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_non_generic_class()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_any_base_type()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
}

你可以试试这个扩展

    public static bool IsSubClassOfGenericClass(this Type type, Type genericClass,Type t)
    {
        return type.IsSubclassOf(genericClass.MakeGenericType(new[] { t }));
    }

贾里德帕尔

这并不为我工作，如果我通过typeof(type<>)作为检查。这是我改变的地方。

static bool IsSubclassOfRawGeneric(Type generic, Type toCheck) {
    while (toCheck != typeof(object)) {
        var cur = toCheck.IsGenericType ? toCheck.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : toCheck;
          if (cur.IsGenericType && generic.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == cur.GetGenericTypeDefinition()) {
            return true;
        }
        toCheck = toCheck.BaseType;
    }
    return false;
}

@EnocNRoll - Ananda Gopal的回答很有趣，但如果一个实例没有预先实例化，或者你想用泛型类型定义检查，我建议使用这个方法:

public static bool TypeIs(this Type x, Type d) {
    if(null==d) {
        return false;
    }

    for(var c = x; null!=c; c=c.BaseType) {
        var a = c.GetInterfaces();

        for(var i = a.Length; i-->=0;) {
            var t = i<0 ? c : a[i];

            if(t==d||t.IsGenericType&&t.GetGenericTypeDefinition()==d) {
                return true;
            }
        }
    }

    return false;
}

像这样使用它:

var b = typeof(char[]).TypeIs(typeof(IList<>)); // true

有四种条件情况，t(待测)和d都是泛型类型，t==d涵盖了两种情况，即(1)t和d都不是泛型定义或(2)它们都是泛型定义。其余的情况是其中一个是一般定义，只有当d已经是一般定义时我们才有机会说t是d，而不是反过来。

它应该与您想要测试的任意类或接口一起工作，并返回与使用is操作符测试该类型的实例一样的结果。

JaredPar的代码可以工作，但只适用于一个继承级别。要获得无限级别的继承，请使用以下代码

public bool IsTypeDerivedFromGenericType(Type typeToCheck, Type genericType)
{
    if (typeToCheck == typeof(object))
    {
        return false;
    }
    else if (typeToCheck == null)
    {
        return false;
    }
    else if (typeToCheck.IsGenericType && typeToCheck.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == genericType)
    {
        return true;
    }
    else
    {
        return IsTypeDerivedFromGenericType(typeToCheck.BaseType, genericType);
    }
}

这些都可以用linq轻松完成。这将找到泛型基类GenericBaseType的子类的任何类型。

    IEnumerable<Type> allTypes = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetTypes();

    IEnumerable<Type> mySubclasses = allTypes.Where(t => t.BaseType != null 
                                                            && t.BaseType.IsGenericType
                                                            && t.BaseType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(GenericBaseType<,>));