我研究了其中一些样本，发现它们在某些情况下是缺乏的。这个版本适用于所有类型的泛型:类型、接口及其类型定义。

public static bool InheritsOrImplements(this Type child, Type parent)
{
    parent = ResolveGenericTypeDefinition(parent);

    var currentChild = child.IsGenericType
                           ? child.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                           : child;

    while (currentChild != typeof (object))
    {
        if (parent == currentChild || HasAnyInterfaces(parent, currentChild))
            return true;

        currentChild = currentChild.BaseType != null
                       && currentChild.BaseType.IsGenericType
                           ? currentChild.BaseType.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                           : currentChild.BaseType;

        if (currentChild == null)
            return false;
    }
    return false;
}

private static bool HasAnyInterfaces(Type parent, Type child)
{
    return child.GetInterfaces()
        .Any(childInterface =>
        {
            var currentInterface = childInterface.IsGenericType
                ? childInterface.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                : childInterface;

            return currentInterface == parent;
        });
}

private static Type ResolveGenericTypeDefinition(Type parent)
{
    var shouldUseGenericType = true;
    if (parent.IsGenericType && parent.GetGenericTypeDefinition() != parent)
        shouldUseGenericType = false;

    if (parent.IsGenericType && shouldUseGenericType)
        parent = parent.GetGenericTypeDefinition();
    return parent;
}

下面是单元测试:

protected interface IFooInterface
{
}

protected interface IGenericFooInterface<T>
{
}

protected class FooBase
{
}

protected class FooImplementor
    : FooBase, IFooInterface
{
}

protected class GenericFooBase
    : FooImplementor, IGenericFooInterface<object>
{

}

protected class GenericFooImplementor<T>
    : FooImplementor, IGenericFooInterface<T>
{
}


[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_non_generic_interface()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IFooInterface)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooBase)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface_by_generic_subclass()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface_by_generic_subclass_not_caring_about_generic_type_parameter()
{
    Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_not_inherit_or_implement_generic_interface_by_generic_subclass_not_caring_about_generic_type_parameter()
{
    Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<int>)), Is.False);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_non_generic_class()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
}

[Test]
public void Should_inherit_or_implement_any_base_type()
{
    Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
        .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
}

这个游戏已经晚了…我对JarodPar的答案也有另一种排列。

下面是Type. issubclassof (Type)，由reflector提供:

    public virtual bool IsSubclassOf(Type c)
    {
        Type baseType = this;
        if (!(baseType == c))
        {
            while (baseType != null)
            {
                if (baseType == c)
                {
                    return true;
                }
                baseType = baseType.BaseType;
            }
            return false;
        }
        return false;
    }

由此，我们看到它并没有做任何过于疯狂的事情，并且类似于JaredPar的迭代方法。到目前为止，一切顺利。这是我的版本(免责声明:没有彻底测试，所以如果你发现问题，请告诉我)

    public static bool IsExtension(this Type thisType, Type potentialSuperType)
    {
        //
        // protect ya neck
        //
        if (thisType == null || potentialSuperType == null || thisType == potentialSuperType) return false;

        //
        // don't need to traverse inheritance for interface extension, so check/do these first
        //
        if (potentialSuperType.IsInterface)
        {
            foreach (var interfaceType in thisType.GetInterfaces())
            {
                var tempType = interfaceType.IsGenericType ? interfaceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : interfaceType;

                if (tempType == potentialSuperType)
                {
                    return true;
                }
            }
        }

        //
        // do the concrete type checks, iterating up the inheritance chain, as in orignal
        //
        while (thisType != null && thisType != typeof(object))
        {
            var cur = thisType.IsGenericType ? thisType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : thisType;

            if (potentialSuperType == cur)
            {
                return true;
            }

            thisType = thisType.BaseType;
        }
        return false;
    }

基本上这只是System的一个扩展方法。类型-我这样做是为了故意将“thisType”类型限制为具体类型，因为我的直接用法是对类型对象的LINQ查询“where”谓词。我相信所有聪明的人都可以把它归结为一个有效的，通用的静态方法，如果你需要:)代码做了一些事情，答案的代码没有

open's it up to to general "extension" - i'm considering inheritance (think classes) as well as implementation (interfaces); method and parameter names are changed to better reflect this input null-validation (meah) input of same type (a class cannot extend itself) short-circuit execution if Type in question is an interface; because GetInterfaces() returns all implemented interfaces (even ones implemented in super-classes), you can simply loop through that collection not having to climb the inheritance tree

其余部分基本上与JaredPar的代码相同

在fir3rpho3nixx和David Schmitt的出色回答的基础上，我修改了他们的代码，并添加了ShouldInheritOrImplementTypedGenericInterface测试(最后一个)。

    /// <summary>
    /// Find out if a child type implements or inherits from the parent type.
    /// The parent type can be an interface or a concrete class, generic or non-generic.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="child"></param>
    /// <param name="parent"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static bool InheritsOrImplements(this Type child, Type parent)
    {
        var currentChild = parent.IsGenericTypeDefinition && child.IsGenericType ? child.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : child;

        while (currentChild != typeof(object))
        {
            if (parent == currentChild || HasAnyInterfaces(parent, currentChild))
                return true;

            currentChild = currentChild.BaseType != null && parent.IsGenericTypeDefinition && currentChild.BaseType.IsGenericType
                                ? currentChild.BaseType.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                                : currentChild.BaseType;

            if (currentChild == null)
                return false;
        }
        return false;
    }

    private static bool HasAnyInterfaces(Type parent, Type child)
    {
        return child.GetInterfaces().Any(childInterface =>
            {
                var currentInterface = parent.IsGenericTypeDefinition && childInterface.IsGenericType
                    ? childInterface.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
                    : childInterface;

                return currentInterface == parent;
            });

    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementNonGenericInterface()
    {
        Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IFooInterface)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementGenericInterface()
    {
        Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooBase)
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementGenericInterfaceByGenericSubclass()
    {
        Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementGenericInterfaceByGenericSubclassNotCaringAboutGenericTypeParameter()
    {
        Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldNotInheritOrImplementGenericInterfaceByGenericSubclassNotCaringAboutGenericTypeParameter()
    {
        Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<int>)), Is.False);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementNonGenericClass()
    {
        Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementAnyBaseType()
    {
        Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
            .InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
    }

    [Test]
    public void ShouldInheritOrImplementTypedGenericInterface()
    {
        GenericFooImplementor<int> obj = new GenericFooImplementor<int>();
        Type t = obj.GetType();

        Assert.IsTrue(t.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<int>)));
        Assert.IsFalse(t.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<String>)));
    } 

Type _type = myclass.GetType();
PropertyInfo[] _propertyInfos = _type.GetProperties();
Boolean _test = _propertyInfos[0].PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() 
== typeof(List<>);

(由于大量重写而重新发布)

JaredPar的代码回答非常棒，但是我有一个技巧，如果您的泛型类型不是基于值类型参数，那么就没有必要这样做。我一直纠结于为什么“is”操作符不能工作，所以我还记录了我的实验结果，以供将来参考。请加强这个答案，以进一步提高其清晰度。

TIP:

如果你确定你的GenericClass实现继承自一个抽象的非泛型基类，比如GenericClassBase，你可以毫不费力地问同样的问题，就像这样:

typeof(Test).IsSubclassOf(typeof(GenericClassBase))

---

IsSubclassOf（）

我的测试表明IsSubclassOf()不适用于无参数的泛型类型，例如

typeof(GenericClass<>)

而它将与

typeof(GenericClass<SomeType>)

因此，以下代码将适用于GenericClass<>的任何派生，假设您愿意基于SomeType进行测试:

typeof(Test).IsSubclassOf(typeof(GenericClass<SomeType>))

我能想象到您希望通过GenericClass<>进行测试的唯一情况是在插件框架场景中。

---

对“is”操作符的思考

在设计时，c#不允许使用无参数泛型，因为那时它们本质上还不是一个完整的CLR类型。因此，必须声明带参数的泛型变量，这就是“is”操作符在处理对象时如此强大的原因。顺便说一句，“is”操作符也不能计算无参数的泛型类型。

“is”操作符将测试整个继承链，包括接口。

因此，给定任何对象的实例，下面的方法就可以做到:

bool IsTypeof<T>(object t)
{
    return (t is T);
}

这有点多余，但我想我可以把它可视化给大家。

鉴于

var t = new Test();

下面几行代码将返回true:

bool test1 = IsTypeof<GenericInterface<SomeType>>(t);

bool test2 = IsTypeof<GenericClass<SomeType>>(t);

bool test3 = IsTypeof<Test>(t);

另一方面，如果你想要一些特定于GenericClass的东西，你可以让它更具体，我想，像这样:

bool IsTypeofGenericClass<SomeType>(object t)
{
    return (t is GenericClass<SomeType>);
}

然后你可以这样测试:

bool test1 = IsTypeofGenericClass<SomeType>(t);

简单的解决方案:只需创建并添加第二个非泛型接口到泛型类:

public interface IGenericClass
{
}

public class GenericClass<T> : GenericInterface<T>, IGenericClass
{
}

然后用is as IsAssignableFrom等任何你喜欢的方式检查。

if (thing is IGenericClass)
{
    // Do work
{

显然，只有当您能够编辑泛型类(OP似乎具有这种能力)时才有可能，但它比使用神秘的扩展方法更优雅、更可读。