我的研究是x:命名为全局变量。但是，Name为局部变量。这是否意味着x:Name可以在XAML文件的任何地方调用，但Name不能。 例子:

<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Content, ElementName=btn}" />
<Button Content="Example" Name="btn" />
</StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Content, ElementName=btn}" />

你不能绑定属性内容的按钮名称是“btn”，因为它在StackPanel之外

x:Name的意思是:在后面的代码中创建一个字段来保存对该对象的引用。

Name表示:设置该对象的Name属性。

我总是使用x:Name变量。 我不知道这是否会影响性能，我只是觉得它更容易，原因如下。 如果您有自己的用户控件驻留在另一个程序集中，只有“Name”属性并不总是足够的。这使得使用x:Name属性更加容易。

Name can also be set using property element syntax with inner text, but that is uncommon. In contrast, x:Name cannot be set in XAML property element syntax, or in code using SetValue; it can only be set using attribute syntax on objects because it is a directive. If Name is available as a property on the class, Name and x:Name can be used interchangeably as attributes, but a parse exception will result if both are specified on the same element. If the XAML is markup compiled, the exception will occur on the markup compile, otherwise it occurs on load.

The specified x:Name becomes the name of a field that is created in the underlying code when XAML is processed, and that field holds a reference to the object. In Silverlight, using the managed API, the process of creating this field is performed by the MSBuild target steps, which also are responsible for joining the partial classes for a XAML file and its code-behind. This behavior is not necessarily XAML-language specified; it is the particular implementation that Silverlight applies to use x:Name in its programming and application models.

阅读更多关于MSDN…

我的研究是x:命名为全局变量。但是，Name为局部变量。这是否意味着x:Name可以在XAML文件的任何地方调用，但Name不能。 例子:

<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Content, ElementName=btn}" />
<Button Content="Example" Name="btn" />
</StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Content, ElementName=btn}" />

你不能绑定属性内容的按钮名称是“btn”，因为它在StackPanel之外