让我们把你的优秀和最喜欢的扩展方法列一个列表。
要求是必须发布完整的代码，以及如何使用它的示例和解释。
基于对这个主题的高度兴趣，我在Codeplex上建立了一个名为extensionoverflow的开源项目。
请将您的回答标记为接受，以便将代码放入Codeplex项目。
请张贴完整的源代码，而不是一个链接。
Codeplex上新闻:
24.08.2010 Codeplex页面现在在这里:http://extensionoverflow.codeplex.com/
11.11.2008 XmlSerialize / XmlDeserialize现在是实现和单元测试。
11.11.2008仍有发展空间。;-)现在就加入!
11.11.2008第三位贡献者加入了ExtensionOverflow，欢迎加入BKristensen
11.11.2008 FormatWith现在是实现和单元测试。
09.11.2008第二个贡献者加入ExtensionOverflow。欢迎来到chakrit。
我们需要更多的开发人员。: -)
09.11.2008 ThrowIfArgumentIsNull现已在Codeplex上实现和单元测试。
这是我写的唯一一个我经常使用的扩展。
它使得用System.Net.Mail发送电子邮件更容易一些。
public static class MailExtension
{
// GetEmailCreditial(out strServer) gets credentials from an XML file
public static void Send(this MailMessage email)
{
string strServer = String.Empty;
NetworkCredential credentials = GetEmailCreditial(out strServer);
SmtpClient client = new SmtpClient(strServer) { Credentials = credentials };
client.Send(email);
}
public static void Send(this IEnumerable<MailMessage> emails)
{
string strServer = String.Empty;
NetworkCredential credentials = GetEmailCreditial(out strServer);
SmtpClient client = new SmtpClient(strServer) { Credentials = credentials };
foreach (MailMessage email in emails)
client.Send(email);
}
}
// Example of use:
new MailMessage("info@myDomain.com","you@gmail.com","This is an important Subject", "Body goes here").Send();
//Assume email1,email2,email3 are MailMessage objects
new List<MailMessage>(){email1, email2, email}.Send();
public static class EnumerableExtensions
{
[Pure]
public static U MapReduce<T, U>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable, Func<T, U> map, Func<U, U, U> reduce)
{
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(enumerable != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(enumerable.Skip(1).Any());
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(map != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(reduce != null);
return enumerable.AsParallel().Select(map).Aggregate(reduce);
}
[Pure]
public static U MapReduce<T, U>(this IList<T> list, Func<T, U> map, Func<U, U, U> reduce)
{
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(list != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(list.Count >= 2);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(map != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(reduce != null);
U result = map(list[0]);
for (int i = 1; i < list.Count; i++)
{
result = reduce(result,map(list[i]));
}
return result;
}
//Parallel version; creates garbage
[Pure]
public static U MapReduce<T, U>(this IList<T> list, Func<T, U> map, Func<U, U, U> reduce)
{
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(list != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(list.Skip(1).Any());
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(map != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(reduce != null);
U[] mapped = new U[list.Count];
Parallel.For(0, mapped.Length, i =>
{
mapped[i] = map(list[i]);
});
U result = mapped[0];
for (int i = 1; i < list.Count; i++)
{
result = reduce(result, mapped[i]);
}
return result;
}
}
NullPartial用于ASP MVC的HTML helper。
当传递一个空模型时，HTML。Partial和HTML。RenderPartial将提供视图的模型，如果这个部分是强类型的，而视图有不同的类型，它将抛出一个异常，而不是传递一个空引用。这些帮助程序允许您指定两个不同的部分，这样您就可以将空测试排除在视图之外。
您有权在Codeplex页面上包含此内容
public static class nullpartials
{
public static MvcHtmlString NullPartial(this HtmlHelper helper, string Partial, string NullPartial, object Model)
{
if (Model == null)
return helper.Partial(NullPartial);
else
return helper.Partial(Partial, Model);
}
public static MvcHtmlString NullPartial(this HtmlHelper helper, string Partial, string NullPartial, object Model, ViewDataDictionary viewdata)
{
if (Model == null)
return helper.Partial(NullPartial, viewdata);
else
return helper.Partial(Partial, Model, viewdata);
}
public static void RenderNullPartial(this HtmlHelper helper, string Partial, string NullPartial, object Model)
{
if (Model == null)
{
helper.RenderPartial(NullPartial);
return;
}
else
{
helper.RenderPartial(Partial, Model);
return;
}
}
public static void RenderNullPartial(this HtmlHelper helper, string Partial, string NullPartial, object Model, ViewDataDictionary viewdata)
{
if (Model == null)
{
helper.RenderPartial(NullPartial, viewdata);
return;
}
else
{
helper.RenderPartial(Partial, Model, viewdata);
return;
}
}
}
我创建了一个漂亮的Each扩展，具有与jQuery的Each函数相同的行为。
它允许如下所示，你可以获得当前值的索引，并通过返回false跳出循环:
new[] { "first", "second", "third" }.Each((value, index) =>
{
if (value.Contains("d"))
return false;
Console.Write(value);
return true;
});
下面是代码
/// <summary>
/// Generic iterator function that is useful to replace a foreach loop with at your discretion. A provided action is performed on each element.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="source"></param>
/// <param name="action">Function that takes in the current value in the sequence.
/// <returns></returns>
public static IEnumerable<T> Each<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Action<T> action)
{
return source.Each((value, index) =>
{
action(value);
return true;
});
}
/// <summary>
/// Generic iterator function that is useful to replace a foreach loop with at your discretion. A provided action is performed on each element.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="source"></param>
/// <param name="action">Function that takes in the current value and its index in the sequence.
/// <returns></returns>
public static IEnumerable<T> Each<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Action<T, int> action)
{
return source.Each((value, index) =>
{
action(value, index);
return true;
});
}
/// <summary>
/// Generic iterator function that is useful to replace a foreach loop with at your discretion. A provided action is performed on each element.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="source"></param>
/// <param name="action">Function that takes in the current value in the sequence. Returns a value indicating whether the iteration should continue. So return false if you don't want to iterate anymore.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static IEnumerable<T> Each<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Func<T, bool> action)
{
return source.Each((value, index) =>
{
return action(value);
});
}
/// <summary>
/// Generic iterator function that is useful to replace a foreach loop with at your discretion. A provided action is performed on each element.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="source"></param>
/// <param name="action">Function that takes in the current value and its index in the sequence. Returns a value indicating whether the iteration should continue. So return false if you don't want to iterate anymore.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static IEnumerable<T> Each<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Func<T, int, bool> action)
{
if (source == null)
return source;
int index = 0;
foreach (var sourceItem in source)
{
if (!action(sourceItem, index))
break;
index++;
}
return source;
}
这些扩展方法异步调用事件。他们受到了StackOverflow的启发。
/// <summary>
/// Invoke an event asynchronously. Each subscriber to the event will be invoked on a separate thread.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="someEvent">The event to be invoked asynchronously.</param>
/// <param name="sender">The sender of the event.</param>
/// <param name="args">The args of the event.</param>
/// <typeparam name="TEventArgs">The type of <see cref="EventArgs"/> to be used with the event.</typeparam>
public static void InvokeAsync<TEventArgs>(this EventHandler<TEventArgs> someEvent, object sender, TEventArgs args)
where TEventArgs : EventArgs
{
if (someEvent == null)
{
return;
}
var eventListeners = someEvent.GetInvocationList();
AsyncCallback endAsyncCallback = delegate(IAsyncResult iar)
{
var ar = iar as AsyncResult;
if (ar == null)
{
return;
}
var invokedMethod = ar.AsyncDelegate as EventHandler<TEventArgs>;
if (invokedMethod != null)
{
invokedMethod.EndInvoke(iar);
}
};
foreach (EventHandler<TEventArgs> methodToInvoke in eventListeners)
{
methodToInvoke.BeginInvoke(sender, args, endAsyncCallback, null);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Invoke an event asynchronously. Each subscriber to the event will be invoked on a separate thread.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="someEvent">The event to be invoked asynchronously.</param>
/// <param name="sender">The sender of the event.</param>
/// <param name="args">The args of the event.</param>
public static void InvokeAsync(this EventHandler someEvent, object sender, EventArgs args)
{
if (someEvent == null)
{
return;
}
var eventListeners = someEvent.GetInvocationList();
AsyncCallback endAsyncCallback = delegate(IAsyncResult iar)
{
var ar = iar as AsyncResult;
if (ar == null)
{
return;
}
var invokedMethod = ar.AsyncDelegate as EventHandler;
if (invokedMethod != null)
{
invokedMethod.EndInvoke(iar);
}
};
foreach (EventHandler methodToInvoke in eventListeners)
{
methodToInvoke.BeginInvoke(sender, args, endAsyncCallback, null);
}
}
使用方法:
public class Foo
{
public event EventHandler<EventArgs> Bar;
public void OnBar()
{
Bar.InvokeAsync(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
请注意，在调用事件之前，您不必检查事件是否为空。例如:
EventHandler<EventArgs> handler = Bar;
if (handler != null)
{
// Invoke the event
}
测试:
void Main()
{
EventHandler<EventArgs> handler1 =
delegate(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
// Simulate performing work in handler1
Thread.Sleep(100);
Console.WriteLine("Handled 1");
};
EventHandler<EventArgs> handler2 =
delegate(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
// Simulate performing work in handler2
Thread.Sleep(50);
Console.WriteLine("Handled 2");
};
EventHandler<EventArgs> handler3 =
delegate(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
// Simulate performing work in handler3
Thread.Sleep(25);
Console.WriteLine("Handled 3");
};
var foo = new Foo();
foo.Bar += handler1;
foo.Bar += handler2;
foo.Bar += handler3;
foo.OnBar();
Console.WriteLine("Start executing important stuff");
// Simulate performing some important stuff here, where we don't want to
// wait around for the event handlers to finish executing
Thread.Sleep(1000);
Console.WriteLine("Finished executing important stuff");
}
调用事件将(通常)产生以下输出:
开始执行重要的事情
处理3
处理2
处理1
完成重要的任务
如果事件是同步调用的，它总是会产生这样的输出-并延迟“重要”内容的执行:
处理1
处理2
处理3
开始执行重要的事情
完成重要的任务
