我之所以来到这个页面是因为同样的问题，但我既没有使用JQuery，也没有一个克隆方法适用于我自己的对象。

我知道我的答案与这个问题没有太大关系，因为这是一种不同的方法。我不使用克隆函数，而是使用创建函数。它对我来说有以下（不幸的是限制）目的：

我主要使用JSP生成的Javascript我一开始就知道必须生成哪个Object（在我的例子中，它是来自数据库的信息，只获取一次，需要在JS中更频繁地部署。

首先，我这样定义对象：

var obj= new Object();
obj.Type='Row';
obj.ID=1;
obj.Value='Blah blah';

现在我移动了所有的东西，比如：

function getObjSelektor(id_nummer,selected){
var obj = document.createElement("select");
obj.setAttribute("id","Selektor_"+id_nummer);
obj.setAttribute("name","Selektor");
obj.setAttribute("size","1");

var obj_opt_1 = document.createElement("option");
obj_opt_1.setAttribute("value","1");
if(1==selected)
    posopval_opt_1.setAttribute("selected","selected");
obj_opt_1.innerHTML="Blah blah";
obj.appendChild(obj_opt_1);

var obj_opt_2 = document.createElement("option");
obj_opt_2.setAttribute("value","2");
if(2==selected)
    obj_opt_2.setAttribute("selected","selected");
obj_opt_2.innerHTML="2nd Row";
obj.appendChild(obj_opt_2);

...

return obj;
}

并调用常规代码中的函数：

myDiv.getObjSelektor(getObjSelektor(anotherObject.ID));

正如所说，这是一种不同的方法，它为我的目的解决了我的问题。

这是对A.Levy代码的修改，以处理函数和多个/循环引用的克隆。这意味着，如果克隆的树中的两个财产是同一对象的引用，则克隆的对象树将使这些财产指向被引用对象的同一克隆。这也解决了循环依赖性的问题，如果不加以处理，就会导致无限循环。算法的复杂度为O（n）

function clone(obj){
    var clonedObjectsArray = [];
    var originalObjectsArray = []; //used to remove the unique ids when finished
    var next_objid = 0;

    function objectId(obj) {
        if (obj == null) return null;
        if (obj.__obj_id == undefined){
            obj.__obj_id = next_objid++;
            originalObjectsArray[obj.__obj_id] = obj;
        }
        return obj.__obj_id;
    }

    function cloneRecursive(obj) {
        if (null == obj || typeof obj == "string" || typeof obj == "number" || typeof obj == "boolean") return obj;

        // Handle Date
        if (obj instanceof Date) {
            var copy = new Date();
            copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
            return copy;
        }

        // Handle Array
        if (obj instanceof Array) {
            var copy = [];
            for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; ++i) {
                copy[i] = cloneRecursive(obj[i]);
            }
            return copy;
        }

        // Handle Object
        if (obj instanceof Object) {
            if (clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] != undefined)
                return clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)];

            var copy;
            if (obj instanceof Function)//Handle Function
                copy = function(){return obj.apply(this, arguments);};
            else
                copy = {};

            clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] = copy;

            for (var attr in obj)
                if (attr != "__obj_id" && obj.hasOwnProperty(attr))
                    copy[attr] = cloneRecursive(obj[attr]);                 

            return copy;
        }       


        throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
    }
    var cloneObj = cloneRecursive(obj);



    //remove the unique ids
    for (var i = 0; i < originalObjectsArray.length; i++)
    {
        delete originalObjectsArray[i].__obj_id;
    };

    return cloneObj;
}

一些快速测试

var auxobj = {
    prop1 : "prop1 aux val", 
    prop2 : ["prop2 item1", "prop2 item2"]
    };

var obj = new Object();
obj.prop1 = "prop1_value";
obj.prop2 = [auxobj, auxobj, "some extra val", undefined];
obj.nr = 3465;
obj.bool = true;

obj.f1 = function (){
    this.prop1 = "prop1 val changed by f1";
};

objclone = clone(obj);

//some tests i've made
console.log("test number, boolean and string cloning: " + (objclone.prop1 == obj.prop1 && objclone.nr == obj.nr && objclone.bool == obj.bool));

objclone.f1();
console.log("test function cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop1 == 'prop1 val changed by f1'));
objclone.f1.prop = 'some prop';
console.log("test function cloning 2: " + (obj.f1.prop == undefined));

objclone.prop2[0].prop1 = "prop1 aux val NEW";
console.log("test multiple references cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 == objclone.prop2[0].prop1));
console.log("test multiple references cloning 2: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 != obj.prop2[0].prop1));

在一行代码中克隆Javascript对象的优雅方法

Object.assign方法是ECMAScript 2015（ES6）标准的一部分，它完全符合您的需要。

var clone = Object.assign({}, obj);

assign（）方法用于将所有可枚举自身财产的值从一个或多个源对象复制到目标对象。

阅读更多。。。

支持旧浏览器的polyfill：

if (!Object.assign) {
  Object.defineProperty(Object, 'assign', {
    enumerable: false,
    configurable: true,
    writable: true,
    value: function(target) {
      'use strict';
      if (target === undefined || target === null) {
        throw new TypeError('Cannot convert first argument to object');
      }

      var to = Object(target);
      for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
        var nextSource = arguments[i];
        if (nextSource === undefined || nextSource === null) {
          continue;
        }
        nextSource = Object(nextSource);

        var keysArray = Object.keys(nextSource);
        for (var nextIndex = 0, len = keysArray.length; nextIndex < len; nextIndex++) {
          var nextKey = keysArray[nextIndex];
          var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(nextSource, nextKey);
          if (desc !== undefined && desc.enumerable) {
            to[nextKey] = nextSource[nextKey];
          }
        }
      }
      return to;
    }
  });
}

function clone(src, deep) {

    var toString = Object.prototype.toString;
    if(!src && typeof src != "object"){
        //any non-object ( Boolean, String, Number ), null, undefined, NaN
        return src;
    }

    //Honor native/custom clone methods
    if(src.clone && toString.call(src.clone) == "[object Function]"){
        return src.clone(deep);
    }

    //DOM Elements
    if(src.nodeType && toString.call(src.cloneNode) == "[object Function]"){
        return src.cloneNode(deep);
    }

    //Date
    if(toString.call(src) == "[object Date]"){
        return new Date(src.getTime());
    }

    //RegExp
    if(toString.call(src) == "[object RegExp]"){
        return new RegExp(src);
    }

    //Function
    if(toString.call(src) == "[object Function]"){
        //Wrap in another method to make sure == is not true;
        //Note: Huge performance issue due to closures, comment this :)
        return (function(){
            src.apply(this, arguments);
        });

    }

    var ret, index;
    //Array
    if(toString.call(src) == "[object Array]"){
        //[].slice(0) would soft clone
        ret = src.slice();
        if(deep){
            index = ret.length;
            while(index--){
                ret[index] = clone(ret[index], true);
            }
        }
    }
    //Object
    else {
        ret = src.constructor ? new src.constructor() : {};
        for (var prop in src) {
            ret[prop] = deep
                ? clone(src[prop], true)
                : src[prop];
        }
    }

    return ret;
};

我最喜欢的优雅JS对象克隆解决方案是

function CloneObject() {}
function cloneObject(o) {
   CloneObject.prototype = o;
   return new CloneObject();
}

使用cloneObject（object）获取JS对象的克隆。

与许多复制解决方案不同，此克隆在克隆对象中保持原型关系。

使用jQuery，可以使用extend进行浅层复制：

var copiedObject = jQuery.extend({}, originalObject)

对copiedObject的后续更改不会影响originalObject，反之亦然。

或制作深度副本：

var copiedObject = jQuery.extend(true, {}, originalObject)