我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y,这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题,因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。
如何正确克隆JavaScript对象?
我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y,这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题,因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。
如何正确克隆JavaScript对象?
当前回答
要处理JSON.stringify无法处理的循环对象,可以引入一个名为JSOG的库,该库将任意图形序列化和反序列化为JSON格式。
var clone = JSOG.parse(JSOG.stringify(original));
尝试使用此技巧修补JSOG以进行克隆可能也很有趣(目前没有时间,但如果有人想尝试一下…):
序列化简单函数:
foo.f = function(a) { return a }
var stringForm = foo.f.toString() // "function (a) { return a }"
反序列化函数:
eval("foo.f = " + stringForm)
需要一些约定(可能是以属性的名称)来标识函数与正则字符串(可能是@func_f)。
当然,如果该函数调用第二个函数,则第二个功能将需要与原始函数一样存在。
然而,如果您要接受来自不可信来源的序列化表单,则上述内容非常危险,但接受来自不可靠来源的任何形式的函数都是危险的,因此如果您对克隆函数感兴趣,则必须已经建立了信任(或者您已经打算编写安全漏洞!)。
免责声明:我没有测试JSOG字符串/解析与JSON字符串/解析的速度,但它确实适用于我测试的简单(循环)对象。
其他回答
根据Apple JavaScript编码指南:
// Create an inner object with a variable x whose default
// value is 3.
function innerObj()
{
this.x = 3;
}
innerObj.prototype.clone = function() {
var temp = new innerObj();
for (myvar in this) {
// this object does not contain any objects, so
// use the lightweight copy code.
temp[myvar] = this[myvar];
}
return temp;
}
// Create an outer object with a variable y whose default
// value is 77.
function outerObj()
{
// The outer object contains an inner object. Allocate it here.
this.inner = new innerObj();
this.y = 77;
}
outerObj.prototype.clone = function() {
var temp = new outerObj();
for (myvar in this) {
if (this[myvar].clone) {
// This variable contains an object with a
// clone operator. Call it to create a copy.
temp[myvar] = this[myvar].clone();
} else {
// This variable contains a scalar value,
// a string value, or an object with no
// clone function. Assign it directly.
temp[myvar] = this[myvar];
}
}
return temp;
}
// Allocate an outer object and assign non-default values to variables in
// both the outer and inner objects.
outer = new outerObj;
outer.inner.x = 4;
outer.y = 16;
// Clone the outer object (which, in turn, clones the inner object).
newouter = outer.clone();
// Verify that both values were copied.
alert('inner x is '+newouter.inner.x); // prints 4
alert('y is '+newouter.y); // prints 16
史蒂夫
我已经编写了自己的实现。不确定它是否算作更好的解决方案:
/*
a function for deep cloning objects that contains other nested objects and circular structures.
objects are stored in a 3D array, according to their length (number of properties) and their depth in the original object.
index (z)
|
|
|
|
|
| depth (x)
|_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
/_/_/_/_/_/_/...../
/................./
/..... /
/ /
/------------------
object length (y) /
*/
实施情况如下:
function deepClone(obj) {
var depth = -1;
var arr = [];
return clone(obj, arr, depth);
}
/**
*
* @param obj source object
* @param arr 3D array to store the references to objects
* @param depth depth of the current object relative to the passed 'obj'
* @returns {*}
*/
function clone(obj, arr, depth){
if (typeof obj !== "object") {
return obj;
}
var length = Object.keys(obj).length; // native method to get the number of properties in 'obj'
var result = Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(obj)); // inherit the prototype of the original object
if(result instanceof Array){
result.length = length;
}
depth++; // depth is increased because we entered an object here
arr[depth] = []; // this is the x-axis, each index here is the depth
arr[depth][length] = []; // this is the y-axis, each index is the length of the object (aka number of props)
// start the depth at current and go down, cyclic structures won't form on depths more than the current one
for(var x = depth; x >= 0; x--){
// loop only if the array at this depth and length already have elements
if(arr[x][length]){
for(var index = 0; index < arr[x][length].length; index++){
if(obj === arr[x][length][index]){
return obj;
}
}
}
}
arr[depth][length].push(obj); // store the object in the array at the current depth and length
for (var prop in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) result[prop] = clone(obj[prop], arr, depth);
}
return result;
}
在ECMAScript 6中有Object.assign方法,它将所有可枚举自身财产的值从一个对象复制到另一个对象。例如:
var x = {myProp: "value"};
var y = Object.assign({}, x);
但请注意,这是一个浅层复制-嵌套对象仍然作为引用复制。
function clone(obj) {
if(obj == null || typeof(obj) != 'object')
return obj;
var temp = new obj.constructor();
for(var key in obj)
temp[key] = clone(obj[key]);
return temp;
}
我认为,在没有库的情况下,缓存的重复性是最好的。
被低估的WeakMap涉及到循环的问题,其中存储对新旧对象的引用可以帮助我们很容易地重建整个树。
我阻止了DOM元素的深度克隆,可能您不想克隆整个页面:)
function deepCopy(object) {
const cache = new WeakMap(); // Map of old - new references
function copy(obj) {
if (typeof obj !== 'object' ||
obj === null ||
obj instanceof HTMLElement
)
return obj; // primitive value or HTMLElement
if (obj instanceof Date)
return new Date().setTime(obj.getTime());
if (obj instanceof RegExp)
return new RegExp(obj.source, obj.flags);
if (cache.has(obj))
return cache.get(obj);
const result = obj instanceof Array ? [] : {};
cache.set(obj, result); // store reference to object before the recursive starts
if (obj instanceof Array) {
for(const o of obj) {
result.push(copy(o));
}
return result;
}
const keys = Object.keys(obj);
for (const key of keys)
result[key] = copy(obj[key]);
return result;
}
return copy(object);
}
一些测试:
// #1
const obj1 = { };
const obj2 = { };
obj1.obj2 = obj2;
obj2.obj1 = obj1; // Trivial circular reference
var copy = deepCopy(obj1);
copy == obj1 // false
copy.obj2 === obj1.obj2 // false
copy.obj2.obj1.obj2 // and so on - no error (correctly cloned).
// #2
const obj = { x: 0 }
const clone = deepCopy({ a: obj, b: obj });
clone.a == clone.b // true
// #3
const arr = [];
arr[0] = arr; // A little bit weird but who cares
clone = deepCopy(arr)
clone == arr // false;
clone[0][0][0][0] == clone // true;
注意:我使用常量、for of循环、=>运算符和WeakMaps来创建更重要的代码。当前的浏览器支持此语法(ES6)