我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y,这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题,因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。

如何正确克隆JavaScript对象?


当前回答

//
// creates 'clone' method on context object
//
//  var 
//     clon = Object.clone( anyValue );
//
!((function (propertyName, definition) {
    this[propertyName] = definition();
}).call(
    Object,
    "clone",
    function () {
        function isfn(fn) {
            return typeof fn === "function";
        }

        function isobj(o) {
            return o === Object(o);
        }

        function isarray(o) {
            return Object.prototype.toString.call(o) === "[object Array]";
        }

        function fnclon(fn) {
            return function () {
                fn.apply(this, arguments);
            };
        }

        function owns(obj, p) {
            return obj.hasOwnProperty(p);
        }

        function isemptyobj(obj) {
            for (var p in obj) {
                return false;
            }
            return true;
        }

        function isObject(o) {
            return Object.prototype.toString.call(o) === "[object Object]";
        }
        return function (input) {
            if (isfn(input)) {
                return fnclon(input);
            } else if (isobj(input)) {
                var cloned = {};
                for (var p in input) {
                    owns(Object.prototype, p)
                    || (
                        isfn(input[p])
                        && ( cloned[p] = function () { return input[p].apply(input, arguments); } )
                        || ( cloned[p] = input[p] )
                    );
                }
                if (isarray(input)) {
                    cloned.length = input.length;
                    "concat every filter forEach indexOf join lastIndexOf map pop push reduce reduceRight reverse shift slice some sort splice toLocaleString toString unshift"
                    .split(" ")
                    .forEach(
                      function (methodName) {
                        isfn( Array.prototype[methodName] )
                        && (
                            cloned[methodName] =
                            function () {
                                return Array.prototype[methodName].apply(cloned, arguments);
                            }
                        );
                      }
                    );
                }
                return isemptyobj(cloned)
                       ? (
                          isObject(input)
                          ? cloned
                          : input
                        )
                       : cloned;
            } else {
                return input;
            }
        };
    }
));
//

其他回答

这里许多同行针对深度克隆提出的解决方案JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(orig_obj)有几个问题,我发现这些问题如下:

它在复制原始对象中未定义值的条目时丢弃这些条目,如果有一些值,如Infinity、NaN等,它们将在复制时转换为null,如果原始对象中存在Date类型,则它将在克隆对象中字符串化(typeof Date_entry-->string)。

找到了一种克隆对象的有效方法,它在各种场景中都很适合我。请看一看下面的代码,因为它已经解决了JSON.parse(…)的所有上述缺陷,但最终实现了正确的深度克隆:

var orig_obj = {
  string: 'my_str',
  number: 123,
  bool: false,
  nul: null,
  nested : {
    value : true
  },
  nan : NaN,
  date: new Date(), 
  undef: undefined,
  inf: Infinity,
}
console.log("original_obj before modification: ", orig_obj, "\n");
console.log(typeof orig_obj.date, "\n");

var clone_obj = Object.assign({}, orig_obj);

//this below loop will help in deep cloning and solving above issues
for(let prop in orig_obj) {
    if(typeof orig_obj[prop] === "object") {
        if(orig_obj[prop] instanceof Date)
            clone_obj[prop] = orig_obj[prop];
        else {
            clone_obj[prop] = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(orig_obj[prop]));
        }
    }
}

console.log("cloned_obj before modification: ", orig_obj, "\n");

clone_obj.bool = true;
clone_obj.nested.value = "false";

console.log("original_obj post modification: ", orig_obj, "\n");
console.log("cloned_obj post modification: ", clone_obj, "\n");
console.log(typeof clone_obj.date);

克隆对象的简单递归方法。也可以使用lodash.clone。

让克隆=(obj)=>{let obj2=Array.isArray(obj)?[] : {};for(设k为obj){obj2[k]=(obj[k]===“对象”的类型)?克隆(obj[k]):obj[k];}返回obj2;}让w={name:“Apple”,类型:[“Fuji”,“Gala”]};设x=克隆(w);w.name=“橙色”;w.types=[“Navel”];console.log(x);console.log(w);

由于mindeeavor指出要克隆的对象是一个“字面构造的”对象,因此解决方案可能是简单地多次生成对象,而不是克隆对象的实例:

function createMyObject()
{
    var myObject =
    {
        ...
    };
    return myObject;
}

var myObjectInstance1 = createMyObject();
var myObjectInstance2 = createMyObject();

在ECMAScript 6中有Object.assign方法,它将所有可枚举自身财产的值从一个对象复制到另一个对象。例如:

var x = {myProp: "value"};
var y = Object.assign({}, x); 

但请注意,这是一个浅层复制-嵌套对象仍然作为引用复制。

这是对A.Levy代码的修改,以处理函数和多个/循环引用的克隆。这意味着,如果克隆的树中的两个财产是同一对象的引用,则克隆的对象树将使这些财产指向被引用对象的同一克隆。这也解决了循环依赖性的问题,如果不加以处理,就会导致无限循环。算法的复杂度为O(n)

function clone(obj){
    var clonedObjectsArray = [];
    var originalObjectsArray = []; //used to remove the unique ids when finished
    var next_objid = 0;

    function objectId(obj) {
        if (obj == null) return null;
        if (obj.__obj_id == undefined){
            obj.__obj_id = next_objid++;
            originalObjectsArray[obj.__obj_id] = obj;
        }
        return obj.__obj_id;
    }

    function cloneRecursive(obj) {
        if (null == obj || typeof obj == "string" || typeof obj == "number" || typeof obj == "boolean") return obj;

        // Handle Date
        if (obj instanceof Date) {
            var copy = new Date();
            copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
            return copy;
        }

        // Handle Array
        if (obj instanceof Array) {
            var copy = [];
            for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; ++i) {
                copy[i] = cloneRecursive(obj[i]);
            }
            return copy;
        }

        // Handle Object
        if (obj instanceof Object) {
            if (clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] != undefined)
                return clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)];

            var copy;
            if (obj instanceof Function)//Handle Function
                copy = function(){return obj.apply(this, arguments);};
            else
                copy = {};

            clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] = copy;

            for (var attr in obj)
                if (attr != "__obj_id" && obj.hasOwnProperty(attr))
                    copy[attr] = cloneRecursive(obj[attr]);                 

            return copy;
        }       


        throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
    }
    var cloneObj = cloneRecursive(obj);



    //remove the unique ids
    for (var i = 0; i < originalObjectsArray.length; i++)
    {
        delete originalObjectsArray[i].__obj_id;
    };

    return cloneObj;
}

一些快速测试

var auxobj = {
    prop1 : "prop1 aux val", 
    prop2 : ["prop2 item1", "prop2 item2"]
    };

var obj = new Object();
obj.prop1 = "prop1_value";
obj.prop2 = [auxobj, auxobj, "some extra val", undefined];
obj.nr = 3465;
obj.bool = true;

obj.f1 = function (){
    this.prop1 = "prop1 val changed by f1";
};

objclone = clone(obj);

//some tests i've made
console.log("test number, boolean and string cloning: " + (objclone.prop1 == obj.prop1 && objclone.nr == obj.nr && objclone.bool == obj.bool));

objclone.f1();
console.log("test function cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop1 == 'prop1 val changed by f1'));
objclone.f1.prop = 'some prop';
console.log("test function cloning 2: " + (obj.f1.prop == undefined));

objclone.prop2[0].prop1 = "prop1 aux val NEW";
console.log("test multiple references cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 == objclone.prop2[0].prop1));
console.log("test multiple references cloning 2: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 != obj.prop2[0].prop1));