StringBuffer和StringBuilder之间的主要区别是什么?在决定其中任何一项时是否存在性能问题?


当前回答

一个简单的程序说明了StringBuffer和StringBuilder之间的区别:

/**
 * Run this program a couple of times. We see that the StringBuilder does not
 * give us reliable results because its methods are not thread-safe as compared
 * to StringBuffer.
 * 
 * For example, the single append in StringBuffer is thread-safe, i.e.
 * only one thread can call append() at any time and would finish writing
 * back to memory one at a time. In contrast, the append() in the StringBuilder 
 * class can be called concurrently by many threads, so the final size of the 
 * StringBuilder is sometimes less than expected.
 * 
 */
public class StringBufferVSStringBuilder {

    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {

        int n = 10; 

        //*************************String Builder Test*******************************//
        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
        StringBuilderTest[] builderThreads = new StringBuilderTest[n];
        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
            builderThreads[i] = new StringBuilderTest(sb);
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
            builderThreads[i].start();
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
            builderThreads[i].join();
        }
        System.out.println("StringBuilderTest: Expected result is 1000; got " + sb.length());

        //*************************String Buffer Test*******************************//

        StringBuffer sb2 = new StringBuffer();
        StringBufferTest[] bufferThreads = new StringBufferTest[n];
        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
            bufferThreads[i] = new StringBufferTest(sb2);
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
            bufferThreads[i].start();
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
            bufferThreads[i].join();
        }
        System.out.println("StringBufferTest: Expected result is 1000; got " + sb2.length());

    }

}

// Every run would attempt to append 100 "A"s to the StringBuilder.
class StringBuilderTest extends Thread {

    StringBuilder sb;

    public StringBuilderTest (StringBuilder sb) {
        this.sb = sb;
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            sb.append("A");
        }

    }
}


//Every run would attempt to append 100 "A"s to the StringBuffer.
class StringBufferTest extends Thread {

    StringBuffer sb2;

    public StringBufferTest (StringBuffer sb2) {
        this.sb2 = sb2;
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            sb2.append("A");
        }

    }
}

其他回答

下面是Stringvs StringBuffer vs StringBuilder的性能测试结果。最后,StringBuilder赢得了测试。测试代码和结果见下文。

代码:

private static void performanceTestStringVsStringbuffereVsStringBuilder() {
// String vs StringBiffer vs StringBuilder performance Test

int loop = 100000;
long start = 0;

// String
String str = null;
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 1; i <= loop; i++) {
  str += i + "test";
}
System.out.println("String - " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + " ms");

// String buffer
StringBuffer sbuffer = new StringBuffer();
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 1; i <= loop; i++) {
  sbuffer.append(i).append("test");
}
System.out.println("String Buffer - " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + " ms");

// String builder
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
StringBuilder sbuilder = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 1; i <= loop; i++) {
  sbuffer.append(i).append("test");
}
System.out.println("String Builder - " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + " ms");

  }

在ideone上执行我

结果:

100000次迭代,用于添加单个文本

String - 37489 ms
String Buffer - 5 ms
String Builder - 4 ms

10000次迭代,用于添加单个文本

String - 389 ms
String Buffer - 1 ms
String Builder - 1 ms

StringBuffer和StringBuilder源之间的差异:

StringBuffer用于存储将要更改的字符串(字符串对象不能更改)。它会根据需要自动展开。相关类:String、CharSequence。

StringBuilder是在Java5中添加的。它在所有方面都与StringBuffer相同,只是它不同步,这意味着如果多个线程同时访问它,可能会出现问题。对于单线程程序,最常见的情况是,避免同步开销会使StringBuilder稍微快一些。

StringBuilder和StringBuffer几乎相同。不同之处在于StringBuffer是同步的,而StringBuilder不是。尽管StringBuilder比StringBuffer更快,但性能差异很小。StringBuilder是SUN对StringBuffer的替代品。它只是避免了所有公共方法的同步。相反,它们的功能是相同的。

良好使用示例:

如果您的文本将要更改并被多个线程使用,那么最好使用StringBuffer。如果您的文本将要更改,但被单个线程使用,请使用StringBuilder。

javadoc解释了区别:

此类提供与StringBuffer兼容的API,但不保证同步。该类被设计为在单个线程使用字符串缓冲区的地方(通常情况下)作为StringBuffer的替代品。在可能的情况下,建议优先使用该类而不是StringBuffer,因为在大多数实现中,它会更快。