Swift 5解决方案:

enum Suit: String, CaseIterable {
    case spades = "♠"
    case hearts = "♥"
    case diamonds = "♦"
    case clubs = "♣"
}

// access cases like this:

for suitKey in Suit.allCases {
    print(suitKey)
}

您可以通过实现ForwardIndexType协议来迭代枚举。

ForwardIndexType协议要求您定义一个继任者()函数来逐级遍历元素。

enum Rank: Int, ForwardIndexType {
    case Ace = 1
    case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
    case Jack, Queen, King

    // ... other functions

    // Option 1 - Figure it out by hand
    func successor() -> Rank {
        switch self {
            case .Ace:
              return .Two
            case .Two:
              return .Three

            // ... etc.

            default:
              return .King
        }
    }

    // Option 2 - Define an operator!
    func successor() -> Rank {
        return self + 1
    }
}

// NOTE: The operator is defined OUTSIDE the class
func + (left: Rank, right: Int) -> Rank {
    // I'm using to/from raw here, but again, you can use a case statement
    // or whatever else you can think of

    return left == .King ? .King : Rank(rawValue: left.rawValue + right)!
}

在开或闭范围内迭代(..<或…)将在内部调用继任者()函数，允许你这样写:

// Under the covers, successor(Rank.King) and successor(Rank.Ace) are called to establish limits
for r in Rank.Ace...Rank.King {
    // Do something useful
}

Swift 5解决方案:

enum Suit: String, CaseIterable {
    case spades = "♠"
    case hearts = "♥"
    case diamonds = "♦"
    case clubs = "♣"
}

// access cases like this:

for suitKey in Suit.allCases {
    print(suitKey)
}

我发现了一种有点俗气但更安全的方法，它不需要键入两次值或引用枚举值的内存，因此不太可能损坏。

基本上，与其使用枚举，不如创建一个具有单个实例的结构体，并将所有enum-values设置为常量。然后可以使用Mirror查询变量

public struct Suit{

    // the values
    let spades = "♠"
    let hearts = "♥"
    let diamonds = "♦"
    let clubs = "♣"

    // make a single instance of the Suit struct, Suit.instance
    struct SStruct{static var instance: Suit = Suit()}
    static var instance : Suit{
        get{return SStruct.instance}
        set{SStruct.instance = newValue}
    }

    // an array with all of the raw values
    static var allValues: [String]{
        var values = [String]()

        let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: Suit.instance)
        for (_, v) in mirror.children{
            guard let suit = v as? String else{continue}
            values.append(suit)
        }

        return values
    }
}

如果使用此方法，则需要使用Suit.instance.clubs或Suit.instance.spades来获取单个值

但所有这些都太无聊了……让我们做一些事情，使它更像一个真正的enum!

public struct SuitType{

    // store multiple things for each suit
    let spades = Suit("♠", order: 4)
    let hearts = Suit("♥", order: 3)
    let diamonds = Suit("♦", order: 2)
    let clubs = Suit("♣", order: 1)

    struct SStruct{static var instance: SuitType = SuitType()}
    static var instance : SuitType{
        get{return SStruct.instance}
        set{SStruct.instance = newValue}
    }

    // a dictionary mapping the raw values to the values
    static var allValuesDictionary: [String : Suit]{
        var values = [String : Suit]()

        let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: SuitType.instance)
        for (_, v) in mirror.children{
            guard let suit = v as? Suit else{continue}
            values[suit.rawValue] = suit
        }

        return values
    }
}

public struct Suit: RawRepresentable, Hashable{
    public var rawValue: String
    public typealias RawValue = String

    public var hashValue: Int{
        // find some integer that can be used to uniquely identify
        // each value. In this case, we could have used the order
        // variable because it is a unique value, yet to make this
        // apply to more cases, the hash table address of rawValue
        // will be returned, which should work in almost all cases
        // 
        // you could also add a hashValue parameter to init() and
        // give each suit a different hash value
        return rawValue.hash
    }

    public var order: Int
    public init(_ value: String, order: Int){
        self.rawValue = value
        self.order = order
    }

    // an array of all of the Suit values
    static var allValues: [Suit]{
        var values = [Suit]()

        let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: SuitType.instance)
        for (_, v) in mirror.children{
            guard let suit = v as? Suit else{continue}
            values.append(suit)
        }

        return values
    }

    // allows for using Suit(rawValue: "♦"), like a normal enum
    public init?(rawValue: String){
        // get the Suit from allValuesDictionary in SuitType, or return nil if that raw value doesn't exist
        guard let suit = SuitType.allValuesDictionary[rawValue] else{return nil}
        // initialize a new Suit with the same properties as that with the same raw value
        self.init(suit.rawValue, order: suit.order)
    }
}

你现在可以做

let allSuits: [Suit] = Suit.allValues

or

for suit in Suit.allValues{
   print("The suit \(suit.rawValue) has the order \(suit.order)")
}

然而，要获得一个单一，你仍然需要使用SuitType.instance.spades或SuitType.instance.hearts。为了更加直观，您可以向Suit添加一些允许您使用Suit.type的代码。*而不是SuitType.instance.*

public struct Suit: RawRepresentable, Hashable{
   // ...your code...

   static var type = SuitType.instance

   // ...more of your code...
}

您现在可以使用Suit.type.diamonds而不是SuitType.instance。diamonds，或者Suit.type.clubs而不是SuitType.instance.clubs

与@Kametrixom的答案在这里，我相信返回一个数组将比返回AnySequence更好，因为你可以访问所有数组的好东西，如计数等。

以下是改写后的内容:

public protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
    public static func allValues() -> [Self] {
        typealias S = Self
        let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
            var raw = 0
            return AnyGenerator {
                let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
                guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
                raw += 1
                return current
            }
        }

        return [S](retVal)
    }
}

有一种聪明的方法，尽管令人沮丧，但它说明了两种不同类型的枚举之间的区别。

试试这个:

    func makeDeck() -> Card[] {
      var deck: Card[] = []
      var suits: Suit[] = [.Hearts, .Diamonds, .Clubs, .Spades]
      for i in 1...13 {
        for suit in suits {
          deck += Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(i)!, suit: suit)
        }
      }
      return deck
    }

交易是，一个由数字(原始值)支持的枚举是隐式显式有序的，而一个没有数字支持的枚举是显式隐式无序的。

例如，当我们给枚举值数字时，语言足够狡猾，可以找出数字的顺序。 另一方面，如果我们不给它任何顺序，当我们尝试迭代这些值时，语言就会举起双手说:“是的，但你想先执行哪个??”

其他可以做到这一点(迭代无序枚举)的语言可能是相同的语言，其中所有内容实际上都是一个地图或字典，你可以迭代地图的键，无论是否有任何逻辑顺序。

诀窍是给它提供一些显式排序的东西，在这个例子中，suit的实例在数组中按照我们想要的顺序。一旦你这么说，霉霉就会说“你为什么不一开始就这么说呢?”

另一个简写技巧是在fromRaw函数上使用强制操作符。这说明了关于枚举的另一个“陷阱”，即可能传入的值的范围通常大于枚举的范围。例如，如果我们说Rank.fromRaw(60)，就不会返回值，所以我们使用了语言的可选特性，在我们开始使用可选特性的地方，很快就会出现强制。(或者交替if let结构，这对我来说仍然有点奇怪)