enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
当前回答
该解决方案在可读性和可维护性之间取得了适当的平衡。
struct Card {
// ...
static func deck() -> Card[] {
var deck = Card[]()
for rank in Rank.Ace.toRaw()...Rank.King.toRaw() {
for suit in [Suit.Spades, .Hearts, .Clubs, .Diamonds] {
let card = Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(rank)!, suit: suit)
deck.append(card)
}
}
return deck
}
}
let deck = Card.deck()
其他回答
这看起来像一个黑客,但如果你使用原始值,你可以这样做
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 0, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
...
}
var suitIndex = 0
while var suit = Suit.fromRaw(suitIndex++) {
...
}
您可以通过实现ForwardIndexType协议来迭代枚举。
ForwardIndexType协议要求您定义一个继任者()函数来逐级遍历元素。
enum Rank: Int, ForwardIndexType {
case Ace = 1
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
// ... other functions
// Option 1 - Figure it out by hand
func successor() -> Rank {
switch self {
case .Ace:
return .Two
case .Two:
return .Three
// ... etc.
default:
return .King
}
}
// Option 2 - Define an operator!
func successor() -> Rank {
return self + 1
}
}
// NOTE: The operator is defined OUTSIDE the class
func + (left: Rank, right: Int) -> Rank {
// I'm using to/from raw here, but again, you can use a case statement
// or whatever else you can think of
return left == .King ? .King : Rank(rawValue: left.rawValue + right)!
}
在开或闭范围内迭代(..<或…)将在内部调用继任者()函数,允许你这样写:
// Under the covers, successor(Rank.King) and successor(Rank.Ace) are called to establish limits
for r in Rank.Ace...Rank.King {
// Do something useful
}
我在比特和字节中跌跌撞撞,创建了一个扩展,后来我发现它与@rintaro的答案非常相似。它是这样使用的:
enum E : EnumCollection {
case A, B, C
}
Array(E.cases()) // [A, B, C]
值得注意的是,它可以在任何没有关联值的enum上使用。注意,这对于没有大小写的枚举不起作用。
与@rintaro的答案一样,这段代码使用枚举的底层表示。这种表示没有文档化,将来可能会改变,这会破坏它。我不建议在生产中使用这种方法。
代码(Swift 2.2, Xcode 7.3.1,不工作在Xcode 10):
protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
static func cases() -> AnySequence<Self> {
typealias S = Self
return AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyGenerator {
let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
}
}
代码(Swift 3, Xcode 8.1,不工作在Xcode 10):
protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
static func cases() -> AnySequence<Self> {
typealias S = Self
return AnySequence { () -> AnyIterator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyIterator {
let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(to: &raw) { $0.withMemoryRebound(to: S.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee } }
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
}
}
我不知道为什么我需要typealias,但编译器抱怨没有它。
另一个解决方案:
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
static var count: Int {
return 4
}
init(index: Int) {
switch index {
case 0: self = .spades
case 1: self = .hearts
case 2: self = .diamonds
default: self = .clubs
}
}
}
for i in 0..<Suit.count {
print(Suit(index: i).rawValue)
}
enum Rank: Int
{
case Ace = 0
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seve, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
case Count
}
enum Suit : Int
{
case Spades = 0
case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
case Count
}
struct Card
{
var rank:Rank
var suit:Suit
}
class Test
{
func makeDeck() -> Card[]
{
let suitsCount:Int = Suit.Count.toRaw()
let rankCount:Int = Rank.Count.toRaw()
let repeatedCard:Card = Card(rank:Rank.Ace, suit:Suit.Spades)
let deck:Card[] = Card[](count:suitsCount*rankCount, repeatedValue:repeatedCard)
for i:Int in 0..rankCount
{
for j:Int in 0..suitsCount
{
deck[i*suitsCount+j] = Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(i)!, suit: Suit.fromRaw(j)!)
}
}
return deck
}
}
根据Rick的回答:这要快5倍