enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
当前回答
更新到Swift 2.2+
func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyGenerator<T> {
var i = 0
return AnyGenerator {
let next = withUnsafePointer(&i) {
UnsafePointer<T>($0).memory
}
if next.hashValue == i {
i += 1
return next
} else {
return nil
}
}
}
它更新了Swift 2.2表单@Kametrixom的答案
Swift 3.0+(非常感谢@Philip)
func iterateEnum<T: Hashable>(_: T.Type) -> AnyIterator<T> {
var i = 0
return AnyIterator {
let next = withUnsafePointer(&i) {
UnsafePointer<T>($0).pointee
}
if next.hashValue == i {
i += 1
return next
} else {
return nil
}
}
}
其他回答
其他的解决方法都是可行的,但它们都假设了可能的等级和花色的数量,或者第一和最后的等级是什么。的确,在可预见的未来,一副纸牌的布局可能不会有太大变化。然而,一般来说,编写尽可能少假设的代码会更简洁。我的解决方案:
我已经在Suit枚举中添加了一个原始类型,所以我可以使用Suit(rawValue:)来访问Suit案例:
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 1
case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades:
return "spades"
case .Hearts:
return "hearts"
case .Diamonds:
return "diamonds"
case .Clubs:
return "clubs"
}
}
func color() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades:
return "black"
case .Clubs:
return "black"
case .Diamonds:
return "red"
case .Hearts:
return "red"
}
}
}
enum Rank: Int {
case Ace = 1
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Ace:
return "ace"
case .Jack:
return "jack"
case .Queen:
return "queen"
case .King:
return "king"
default:
return String(self.rawValue)
}
}
}
在Card的createDeck()方法实现的下面。init(rawValue:)是一个可失败的初始化式,返回一个可选值。通过在两个while语句中展开并检查它的值,不需要假设Rank或Suit情况的数量:
struct Card {
var rank: Rank
var suit: Suit
func simpleDescription() -> String {
return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
}
func createDeck() -> [Card] {
var n = 1
var deck = [Card]()
while let rank = Rank(rawValue: n) {
var m = 1
while let suit = Suit(rawValue: m) {
deck.append(Card(rank: rank, suit: suit))
m += 1
}
n += 1
}
return deck
}
}
下面是如何调用createDeck方法:
let card = Card(rank: Rank.Ace, suit: Suit.Clubs)
let deck = card.createDeck()
在处理Swift 2.0时,以下是我的建议:
我已经将原始类型添加到Suit enum
enum Suit: Int {
然后:
struct Card {
var rank: Rank
var suit: Suit
func fullDeck()-> [Card] {
var deck = [Card]()
for i in Rank.Ace.rawValue...Rank.King.rawValue {
for j in Suit.Spades.rawValue...Suit.Clubs.rawValue {
deck.append(Card(rank:Rank(rawValue: i)! , suit: Suit(rawValue: j)!))
}
}
return deck
}
}
这是一个相当老的帖子,来自Swift 2.0。现在有一些更好的解决方案,使用了swift 3.0的新特性: 在Swift 3.0中迭代一个Enum
关于这个问题,有一个解决方案,它使用了Swift 4.2的一个新功能(在我写这篇编辑时还没有发布): 我如何得到一个Swift枚举的计数?
在这个帖子中有很多好的解决方案,但其中一些非常复杂。我喜欢尽可能地简化。这里有一个解决方案,可能适用于不同的需求,但我认为它在大多数情况下都很好:
enum Number: String {
case One
case Two
case Three
case Four
case EndIndex
func nextCase () -> Number
{
switch self {
case .One:
return .Two
case .Two:
return .Three
case .Three:
return .Four
case .Four:
return .EndIndex
/*
Add all additional cases above
*/
case .EndIndex:
return .EndIndex
}
}
static var allValues: [String] {
var array: [String] = Array()
var number = Number.One
while number != Number.EndIndex {
array.append(number.rawValue)
number = number.nextCase()
}
return array
}
}
迭代:
for item in Number.allValues {
print("number is: \(item)")
}
您可以通过实现ForwardIndexType协议来迭代枚举。
ForwardIndexType协议要求您定义一个继任者()函数来逐级遍历元素。
enum Rank: Int, ForwardIndexType {
case Ace = 1
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
// ... other functions
// Option 1 - Figure it out by hand
func successor() -> Rank {
switch self {
case .Ace:
return .Two
case .Two:
return .Three
// ... etc.
default:
return .King
}
}
// Option 2 - Define an operator!
func successor() -> Rank {
return self + 1
}
}
// NOTE: The operator is defined OUTSIDE the class
func + (left: Rank, right: Int) -> Rank {
// I'm using to/from raw here, but again, you can use a case statement
// or whatever else you can think of
return left == .King ? .King : Rank(rawValue: left.rawValue + right)!
}
在开或闭范围内迭代(..<或…)将在内部调用继任者()函数,允许你这样写:
// Under the covers, successor(Rank.King) and successor(Rank.Ace) are called to establish limits
for r in Rank.Ace...Rank.King {
// Do something useful
}
enum Rank: Int {
...
static let ranks = (Rank.Ace.rawValue ... Rank.King.rawValue).map{Rank(rawValue: $0)! }
}
enum Suit {
...
static let suits = [Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs]
}
struct Card {
...
static func fullDesk() -> [Card] {
var desk: [Card] = []
for suit in Suit.suits {
for rank in Rank.ranks {
desk.append(Card(rank: rank,suit: suit))
}
}
return desk
}
}
这个怎么样?