enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
当前回答
我添加了函数count(),并迭代值:
public enum MetricType: Int {
case mvps = 0
case allNBA = 1
case championshipRings = 2
case finalAppearances = 3
case gamesPlayed = 4
case ppg = 5
static func count() -> Int {
return (ppg.rawValue) + 1
}
static var allValues: [MetricType] {
var array: [MetricType] = Array()
var item : MetricType = MetricType.mvps
while item.rawValue < MetricType.count() {
array.append(item)
item = MetricType(rawValue: (item.rawValue + 1))!
}
return array
}
}
其他回答
这篇文章是相关的https://www.swift-studies.com/blog/2014/6/10/enumerating-enums-in-swift
基本上,提议的解决方案是
enum ProductCategory : String {
case Washers = "washers", Dryers = "dryers", Toasters = "toasters"
static let allValues = [Washers, Dryers, Toasters]
}
for category in ProductCategory.allValues{
//Do something
}
有一种聪明的方法,尽管令人沮丧,但它说明了两种不同类型的枚举之间的区别。
试试这个:
func makeDeck() -> Card[] {
var deck: Card[] = []
var suits: Suit[] = [.Hearts, .Diamonds, .Clubs, .Spades]
for i in 1...13 {
for suit in suits {
deck += Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(i)!, suit: suit)
}
}
return deck
}
交易是,一个由数字(原始值)支持的枚举是隐式显式有序的,而一个没有数字支持的枚举是显式隐式无序的。
例如,当我们给枚举值数字时,语言足够狡猾,可以找出数字的顺序。 另一方面,如果我们不给它任何顺序,当我们尝试迭代这些值时,语言就会举起双手说:“是的,但你想先执行哪个??”
其他可以做到这一点(迭代无序枚举)的语言可能是相同的语言,其中所有内容实际上都是一个地图或字典,你可以迭代地图的键,无论是否有任何逻辑顺序。
诀窍是给它提供一些显式排序的东西,在这个例子中,suit的实例在数组中按照我们想要的顺序。一旦你这么说,霉霉就会说“你为什么不一开始就这么说呢?”
另一个简写技巧是在fromRaw函数上使用强制操作符。这说明了关于枚举的另一个“陷阱”,即可能传入的值的范围通常大于枚举的范围。例如,如果我们说Rank.fromRaw(60),就不会返回值,所以我们使用了语言的可选特性,在我们开始使用可选特性的地方,很快就会出现强制。(或者交替if let结构,这对我来说仍然有点奇怪)
实验内容是: 实验
在Card中添加一个方法,用于创建一副完整的牌,每一副牌都是rank和花色的组合。
因此,除了添加方法之外,没有修改或增强给定的代码(并且没有使用还没有教过的东西),我想出了这个解决方案:
struct Card {
var rank: Rank
var suit: Suit
func simpleDescription() -> String {
return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
}
func createDeck() -> [Card] {
var deck: [Card] = []
for rank in Rank.Ace.rawValue...Rank.King.rawValue {
for suit in Suit.Spades.rawValue...Suit.Clubs.rawValue {
let card = Card(rank: Rank(rawValue: rank)!, suit: Suit(rawValue: suit)!)
//println(card.simpleDescription())
deck += [card]
}
}
return deck
}
}
let threeOfSpades = Card(rank: .Three, suit: .Spades)
let threeOfSpadesDescription = threeOfSpades.simpleDescription()
let deck = threeOfSpades.createDeck()
该解决方案在可读性和可维护性之间取得了适当的平衡。
struct Card {
// ...
static func deck() -> Card[] {
var deck = Card[]()
for rank in Rank.Ace.toRaw()...Rank.King.toRaw() {
for suit in [Suit.Spades, .Hearts, .Clubs, .Diamonds] {
let card = Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(rank)!, suit: suit)
deck.append(card)
}
}
return deck
}
}
let deck = Card.deck()
我的解决方案是声明一个包含所有枚举可能性的数组。所以for循环可以遍历所有这些。
//Function inside struct Card
static func generateFullDeck() -> [Card] {
let allRanks = [Rank.Ace, Rank.Two, Rank.Three, Rank.Four, Rank.Five, Rank.Six, Rank.Seven, Rank.Eight, Rank.Nine, Rank.Ten, Rank.Jack, Rank.Queen, Rank.King]
let allSuits = [Suit.Hearts, Suit.Diamonds, Suit.Clubs, Suit.Spades]
var myFullDeck: [Card] = []
for myRank in allRanks {
for mySuit in allSuits {
myFullDeck.append(Card(rank: myRank, suit: mySuit))
}
}
return myFullDeck
}
//actual use:
let aFullDeck = Card.generateFullDeck() //Generate the desired full deck
var allDesc: [String] = []
for aCard in aFullDeck {
println(aCard.simpleDescription()) //You'll see all the results in playground
}