假设我有3个输入:rate、sendAmount和receiveAmount。我把这3个输入放到useEffect上。规则如下:

如果sendAmount改变了,我计算receiveAmount = sendAmount * rate 如果receiveAmount改变了,我计算sendAmount = receiveAmount / rate 如果速率发生变化,当sendAmount > 0时,我计算receiveAmount = sendAmount * rate;当receiveAmount > 0时,我计算sendAmount = receiveAmount / rate

下面是代码和框https://codesandbox.io/s/pkl6vn7x6j来演示这个问题。

是否有一种方法来比较oldValues和newValues,如componentDidUpdate,而不是为这种情况下做3处理程序?

谢谢


下面是我使用usePrevious的最终解决方案 https://codesandbox.io/s/30n01w2r06

在本例中,我不能使用多个useEffect,因为每次更改都会导致相同的网络调用。这就是为什么我还使用changeCount来跟踪更改。这个changeCount还有助于仅从本地跟踪更改,因此可以防止由于服务器更改而引起的不必要的网络调用。


当前回答

使用Ref会在应用程序中引入一种新的错误。

让我们看看这个例子,使用usePrevious,之前有人评论过:

道具。minTime: 5 ==> ref.current = 5 | set ref.current 道具。minTime: 5 ==> ref.current = 5 |的新值等于ref.current 道具。minTime: 8 ==> ref.current = 5 |的新值不等于ref.current 道具。minTime: 5 ==> ref.current = 5 |的新值等于ref.current

正如我们在这里看到的,我们没有更新内部引用,因为我们使用的是useEffect

其他回答

在你的例子中(简单对象):

useEffect(()=>{
  // your logic
}, [rate, sendAmount, receiveAmount])

在其他情况下(复杂对象)

const {cityInfo} = props;
useEffect(()=>{
  // some logic
}, [cityInfo.cityId])

您可以编写一个自定义钩子,使用useRef为您提供先前的道具

function usePrevious(value) {
  const ref = useRef();
  useEffect(() => {
    ref.current = value;
  });
  return ref.current;
}

然后在useEffect中使用它

const Component = (props) => {
    const {receiveAmount, sendAmount } = props
    const prevAmount = usePrevious({receiveAmount, sendAmount});
    useEffect(() => {
        if(prevAmount.receiveAmount !== receiveAmount) {

         // process here
        }
        if(prevAmount.sendAmount !== sendAmount) {

         // process here
        }
    }, [receiveAmount, sendAmount])
}

但是,如果您为每个想要单独处理的变更id分别使用两个useEffect,那么阅读和理解起来会更清晰,可能会更好

下面是Aadit M Shah的答案的Typescript版本。

我把它从useTransition重命名为usePrevious,因为useTransition已经存在于React中。

import { useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';

const usePrevious = <T extends any[],>(callback: (prev: T) => void, deps: T): void => {
  const callbackRef = useRef<null | ((prev: T) => void)>(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    callbackRef.current = callback;
  }, [callback]);

  const depsRef = useRef<null | T>(null);

  const [initial, setInitial] = useState(true);

  useEffect(() => {
    if (!initial && depsRef.current !== null && callbackRef.current !== null) {
      callbackRef.current(depsRef.current);
    }

    depsRef.current = deps;
    setInitial(false);
  }, deps);
}

export default usePrevious;

用法:

  usePrevious<[boolean]>(([prevIsOpen]) => {
    console.log('prev', prevIsOpen);
    console.log('now', isOpen);
  }, [isOpen])

离开公认的答案,一个不需要自定义钩子的替代解决方案:

const Component = ({ receiveAmount, sendAmount }) => {
  const prevAmount = useRef({ receiveAmount, sendAmount }).current;

  useEffect(() => {
    if (prevAmount.receiveAmount !== receiveAmount) {
     // process here
    }

    if (prevAmount.sendAmount !== sendAmount) {
     // process here
    }

    return () => { 
      prevAmount.receiveAmount = receiveAmount;
      prevAmount.sendAmount = sendAmount;
    };
  }, [receiveAmount, sendAmount]);
};

这假设您实际上需要引用前面“process here”位中的任何值。否则,除非你的条件超出了一个直接的!==比较,这里最简单的解决方案是:

const Component = ({ receiveAmount, sendAmount }) => {
  useEffect(() => {
     // process here
  }, [receiveAmount]);

  useEffect(() => {
     // process here
  }, [sendAmount]);
};

选项1 -当值改变时运行useEffect

const Component = (props) => {

  useEffect(() => {
    console.log("val1 has changed");
  }, [val1]);

  return <div>...</div>;
};

Demo

选项2 - useHasChanged钩子

比较当前值和以前值是一种常见的模式,它证明了它自己的自定义钩子隐藏了实现细节。

const Component = (props) => {
  const hasVal1Changed = useHasChanged(val1)

  useEffect(() => {
    if (hasVal1Changed ) {
      console.log("val1 has changed");
    }
  });

  return <div>...</div>;
};

const useHasChanged= (val: any) => {
    const prevVal = usePrevious(val)
    return prevVal !== val
}

const usePrevious = (value) => {
    const ref = useRef();
    useEffect(() => {
      ref.current = value;
    });
    return ref.current;
}


Demo