我在我的项目中也有同样的问题，首先我试图在视图上触发导航动作的点击，但经过一些实验后，我发现在真正缓慢的设备上，debounce应该是一个非常高的值，导致应用程序对快速设备的用户感到缓慢。

所以我为NavController提出了以下扩展，我认为它符合原始的API，并且易于使用:

fun NavController.safeNavigate(directions: NavDirections) {
    try {
        currentDestination?.getAction(directions.actionId) ?: return
        navigate(directions.actionId, directions.arguments, null)
    } catch (e : Exception) {
        logError("Navigation error", e)
    }
}

fun NavController.safeNavigate(directions: NavDirections, navOptions: NavOptions?) {
    try {
        currentDestination?.getAction(directions.actionId) ?: return
        navigate(directions.actionId, directions.arguments, navOptions)
    } catch (e : Exception) {
        logError("Navigation error", e)
    }
}

fun NavController.safeNavigate(directions: NavDirections, navigatorExtras: Navigator.Extras) {
    try {
        currentDestination?.getAction(directions.actionId) ?: return
        navigate(directions.actionId, directions.arguments, null, navigatorExtras)
    } catch (e : Exception) {
        logError("Navigation error", e)
    }
}

请注意，我正在使用SafeArgs和NavDirections。这些函数检查操作从当前目的地是否有效，并且仅在操作不为空时进行导航。如果Navigation库每次都返回正确的操作，那么try catch部分就不需要了，但我希望消除所有可能的崩溃。

看来你在完成任务。应用程序可能有一次性设置或一系列登录屏幕。这些有条件的屏幕不应该被认为是应用程序的起始目的地。

https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/architecture/navigation/navigation-conditional

您可以在导航控制器的当前目标中检查请求的操作。

更新 为安全导航增加了全局操作的使用。

fun NavController.navigateSafe(
        @IdRes resId: Int,
        args: Bundle? = null,
        navOptions: NavOptions? = null,
        navExtras: Navigator.Extras? = null
) {
    val action = currentDestination?.getAction(resId) ?: graph.getAction(resId)
    if (action != null && currentDestination?.id != action.destinationId) {
        navigate(resId, args, navOptions, navExtras)
    }
}

在我的例子中，如果用户非常非常快地点击同一个视图两次，这个崩溃就会发生。所以你需要实现某种逻辑来防止多次快速点击……这很烦人，但似乎是必要的。

你可以在这里阅读更多关于防止这种情况的内容:Android防止双击按钮

编辑3/19/2019:为了进一步澄清一点，这个崩溃不是仅仅通过“非常非常快地单击同一个视图两次”就可以完全重现的。或者，您可以使用两个手指同时单击两个(或更多)视图，其中每个视图都有自己的导航。当你有一个项目列表时，这尤其容易做到。以上关于多次点击预防的信息将处理这种情况。

编辑4/16/2020:以防你对上面的Stack Overflow帖子不太感兴趣，我包括了我自己的(Kotlin)解决方案，我已经使用了很长一段时间了。

OnSingleClickListener.kt

class OnSingleClickListener : View.OnClickListener {

    private val onClickListener: View.OnClickListener

    constructor(listener: View.OnClickListener) {
        onClickListener = listener
    }

    constructor(listener: (View) -> Unit) {
        onClickListener = View.OnClickListener { listener.invoke(it) }
    }

    override fun onClick(v: View) {
        val currentTimeMillis = System.currentTimeMillis()

        if (currentTimeMillis >= previousClickTimeMillis + DELAY_MILLIS) {
            previousClickTimeMillis = currentTimeMillis
            onClickListener.onClick(v)
        }
    }

    companion object {
        // Tweak this value as you see fit. In my personal testing this
        // seems to be good, but you may want to try on some different
        // devices and make sure you can't produce any crashes.
        private const val DELAY_MILLIS = 200L

        private var previousClickTimeMillis = 0L
    }

}

ViewExt.kt

fun View.setOnSingleClickListener(l: View.OnClickListener) {
    setOnClickListener(OnSingleClickListener(l))
}

fun View.setOnSingleClickListener(l: (View) -> Unit) {
    setOnClickListener(OnSingleClickListener(l))
}

HomeFragment.kt

override fun onViewCreated(view: View, savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
    super.onViewCreated(view, savedInstanceState)

    settingsButton.setOnSingleClickListener {
        // navigation call here
    }
}

您可以在导航之前检查请求导航的Fragment是否仍然是当前目的地，从这个要点出发。

它基本上是在片段上设置一个标记，以便稍后进行查找。

/**
 * Returns true if the navigation controller is still pointing at 'this' fragment, or false if it already navigated away.
 */
fun Fragment.mayNavigate(): Boolean {

    val navController = findNavController()
    val destinationIdInNavController = navController.currentDestination?.id
    val destinationIdOfThisFragment = view?.getTag(R.id.tag_navigation_destination_id) ?: destinationIdInNavController

    // check that the navigation graph is still in 'this' fragment, if not then the app already navigated:
    if (destinationIdInNavController == destinationIdOfThisFragment) {
        view?.setTag(R.id.tag_navigation_destination_id, destinationIdOfThisFragment)
        return true
    } else {
        Log.d("FragmentExtensions", "May not navigate: current destination is not the current fragment.")
        return false
    }
}

R.id。Tag_navigation_destination_id只是一个id，必须添加到ids.xml中，以确保它是唯一的。<item name="tag_navigation_destination_id" type="id" />

更多关于bug和解决方案的信息，以及navigateSafe(…)扩展方法在“修复可怕的”…是未知的NavController”

I am calling the 2.3.1 Navigation and the same error occurs when the application configuration changes. When the cause of the problem was found through Debug, the GaphId in NavHostFragment did not take effect as the ID currently set by calling navController.setGraph(). The GraphId of NavHostFragment can only be obtained from the <androidx.fragment.app.FragmentContainerView/> tag. At this time, this problem will occur if there are multiple GraphIds dynamically set in your code. When the interface is restored, the Destination cannot be found in the cached GraphId. You can solve this problem by manually specifying the value of mGraphId in NavHostFragment through reflection when switching Graph.

navController.setGraph(R.navigation.home_book_navigation);
try {
    Field graphIdField = hostFragment.getClass().getDeclaredField("mGraphId");
    graphIdField.setAccessible(true);
    graphIdField.set(navHostFragment, R.navigation.home_book_navigation);
} catch (NoSuchFieldException | IllegalAccessException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
}