是否有可能编写一个模板,根据某个成员函数是否定义在类上而改变行为?

下面是我想写的一个简单的例子:

template<class T>
std::string optionalToString(T* obj)
{
    if (FUNCTION_EXISTS(T->toString))
        return obj->toString();
    else
        return "toString not defined";
}

因此,如果类T定义了toString(),那么它就使用它;否则,它就不会。我不知道如何做的神奇部分是“FUNCTION_EXISTS”部分。


当前回答

是的,使用SFINAE您可以检查给定的类是否提供了特定的方法。下面是工作代码:

#include <iostream>

struct Hello
{
    int helloworld() { return 0; }
};

struct Generic {};    

// SFINAE test
template <typename T>
class has_helloworld
{
    typedef char one;
    struct two { char x[2]; };

    template <typename C> static one test( decltype(&C::helloworld) ) ;
    template <typename C> static two test(...);    

public:
    enum { value = sizeof(test<T>(0)) == sizeof(char) };
};
    
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    std::cout << has_helloworld<Hello>::value << std::endl;
    std::cout << has_helloworld<Generic>::value << std::endl;
    return 0;
}

我刚刚用Linux和gcc 4.1/4.3测试了它。我不知道它是否可以移植到运行不同编译器的其他平台。

其他回答

MSVC有__if_exists和__if_not_exists关键字(Doc)。连同Nicola的typef - sfinae方法,我可以创建一个检查GCC和MSVC,就像OP所寻找的那样。

更新:来源可以在这里找到

一个使用SFINAE和模板部分特化的例子,通过编写Has_foo概念检查:

#include <type_traits>
struct A{};

struct B{ int foo(int a, int b);};

struct C{void foo(int a, int b);};

struct D{int foo();};

struct E: public B{};

// available in C++17 onwards as part of <type_traits>
template<typename...>
using void_t = void;

template<typename T, typename = void> struct Has_foo: std::false_type{};

template<typename T> 
struct Has_foo<T, void_t<
    std::enable_if_t<
        std::is_same<
            int, 
            decltype(std::declval<T>().foo((int)0, (int)0))
        >::value
    >
>>: std::true_type{};


static_assert(not Has_foo<A>::value, "A does not have a foo");
static_assert(Has_foo<B>::value, "B has a foo");
static_assert(not Has_foo<C>::value, "C has a foo with the wrong return. ");
static_assert(not Has_foo<D>::value, "D has a foo with the wrong arguments. ");
static_assert(Has_foo<E>::value, "E has a foo since it inherits from B");

这个解决方案怎么样?

#include <type_traits>

template <typename U, typename = void> struct hasToString : std::false_type { };

template <typename U>
struct hasToString<U,
  typename std::enable_if<bool(sizeof(&U::toString))>::type
> : std::true_type { };

我知道这个问题已经存在多年了,但我认为对像我这样的人来说,有一个更完整的更新的答案是有用的,它也适用于const重载方法,如std::vector::begin。

基于这个答案和我接下来的问题,这里有一个更完整的答案。注意,这只适用于c++ 11及更高版本。

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

class EmptyClass{};

template <typename T>
class has_begin
{
    private:
    has_begin() = delete;
    
    struct one { char x[1]; };
    struct two { char x[2]; };

    template <typename C> static one test( decltype(void(std::declval<C &>().begin())) * ) ;
    template <typename C> static two test(...);    

public:
    static constexpr bool value = sizeof(test<T>(0)) == sizeof(one);
};
    
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    std::cout << std::boolalpha;
    std::cout << "vector<int>::begin() exists: " << has_begin<std::vector<int>>::value << std::endl;
    std::cout << "EmptyClass::begin() exists: " << has_begin<EmptyClass>::value << std::endl;
    return 0;
}

或者更短的版本:

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

class EmptyClass{};

template <typename T, typename = void>
struct has_begin : std::false_type {};

template <typename T>
struct has_begin<T, decltype(void(std::declval<T &>().begin()))> : std::true_type {};

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    std::cout << std::boolalpha;
    std::cout << "vector<int>::begin() exists: " << has_begin<std::vector<int>>::value << std::endl;
    std::cout << "EmptyClass exists: " << has_begin<EmptyClass>::value << std::endl;
}

注意,这里必须提供一个完整的示例调用。这意味着如果我们测试resize方法是否存在,那么我们将输入resize(0)。

深魔解释:

这个问题的第一个答案使用了test(decltype(&C::helloworld));然而,当它所测试的方法由于const重载而模棱两可时,这就有问题了,从而导致替换尝试失败。

为了解决这种模糊性,我们使用了一个void语句,它可以接受任何参数,因为它总是被转换为noop,因此模糊性是无效的,并且只要方法存在,调用就有效:

has_begin<T, decltype(void(std::declval<T &>().begin()))>

以下是依次发生的事情: 我们使用std::declval<T &>()来创建一个可调用值,然后可以调用begin。在此之后,begin的值作为参数传递给void语句。然后使用内置decltype检索该void表达式的类型,以便将其用作模板类型参数。如果begin不存在,则替换无效,根据SFINAE,将使用其他声明。

泛型模板,用于检查类型是否支持某些“特性”:

#include <type_traits>

template <template <typename> class TypeChecker, typename Type>
struct is_supported
{
    // these structs are used to recognize which version
    // of the two functions was chosen during overload resolution
    struct supported {};
    struct not_supported {};

    // this overload of chk will be ignored by SFINAE principle
    // if TypeChecker<Type_> is invalid type
    template <typename Type_>
    static supported chk(typename std::decay<TypeChecker<Type_>>::type *);

    // ellipsis has the lowest conversion rank, so this overload will be
    // chosen during overload resolution only if the template overload above is ignored
    template <typename Type_>
    static not_supported chk(...);

    // if the template overload of chk is chosen during
    // overload resolution then the feature is supported
    // if the ellipses overload is chosen the the feature is not supported
    static constexpr bool value = std::is_same<decltype(chk<Type>(nullptr)),supported>::value;
};

检查方法foo是否与signature double兼容的模板(const char*)

// if T doesn't have foo method with the signature that allows to compile the bellow
// expression then instantiating this template is Substitution Failure (SF)
// which Is Not An Error (INAE) if this happens during overload resolution
template <typename T>
using has_foo = decltype(double(std::declval<T>().foo(std::declval<const char*>())));

例子

// types that support has_foo
struct struct1 { double foo(const char*); };            // exact signature match
struct struct2 { int    foo(const std::string &str); }; // compatible signature
struct struct3 { float  foo(...); };                    // compatible ellipsis signature
struct struct4 { template <typename T>
                 int    foo(T t); };                    // compatible template signature

// types that do not support has_foo
struct struct5 { void        foo(const char*); }; // returns void
struct struct6 { std::string foo(const char*); }; // std::string can't be converted to double
struct struct7 { double      foo(      int *); }; // const char* can't be converted to int*
struct struct8 { double      bar(const char*); }; // there is no foo method

int main()
{
    std::cout << std::boolalpha;

    std::cout << is_supported<has_foo, int    >::value << std::endl; // false
    std::cout << is_supported<has_foo, double >::value << std::endl; // false

    std::cout << is_supported<has_foo, struct1>::value << std::endl; // true
    std::cout << is_supported<has_foo, struct2>::value << std::endl; // true
    std::cout << is_supported<has_foo, struct3>::value << std::endl; // true
    std::cout << is_supported<has_foo, struct4>::value << std::endl; // true

    std::cout << is_supported<has_foo, struct5>::value << std::endl; // false
    std::cout << is_supported<has_foo, struct6>::value << std::endl; // false
    std::cout << is_supported<has_foo, struct7>::value << std::endl; // false
    std::cout << is_supported<has_foo, struct8>::value << std::endl; // false

    return 0;
}

http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/83c6a631ed42cea4