只是建立在@SCB的想法(这正是我所需要的)，创建一个KillableThread子类与自定义函数:

from threading import Thread, Event

class KillableThread(Thread):
    def __init__(self, sleep_interval=1, target=None, name=None, args=(), kwargs={}):
        super().__init__(None, target, name, args, kwargs)
        self._kill = Event()
        self._interval = sleep_interval
        print(self._target)

    def run(self):
        while True:
            # Call custom function with arguments
            self._target(*self._args)

            # If no kill signal is set, sleep for the interval,
            # If kill signal comes in while sleeping, immediately
            #  wake up and handle
            is_killed = self._kill.wait(self._interval)
            if is_killed:
                break

        print("Killing Thread")

    def kill(self):
        self._kill.set()

if __name__ == '__main__':

    def print_msg(msg):
        print(msg)

    t = KillableThread(10, print_msg, args=("hello world"))
    t.start()
    time.sleep(6)
    print("About to kill thread")
    t.kill()

自然地，就像@SBC一样，线程不会等待运行一个新的循环来停止。在这个例子中，你会看到“kill Thread”消息紧跟在“About to kill Thread”之后，而不是等待4秒钟线程完成(因为我们已经睡了6秒了)。

KillableThread构造函数中的第二个参数是您的自定义函数(print_msg)。Args参数是在调用函数(("hello world"))时使用的参数。

如果您显式地调用time.sleep()作为线程的一部分(比如轮询一些外部服务)，对Phillipe方法的改进是在sleep()的任何地方使用事件的wait()方法中的超时。

例如:

import threading

class KillableThread(threading.Thread):
    def __init__(self, sleep_interval=1):
        super().__init__()
        self._kill = threading.Event()
        self._interval = sleep_interval

    def run(self):
        while True:
            print("Do Something")

            # If no kill signal is set, sleep for the interval,
            # If kill signal comes in while sleeping, immediately
            #  wake up and handle
            is_killed = self._kill.wait(self._interval)
            if is_killed:
                break

        print("Killing Thread")

    def kill(self):
        self._kill.set()

然后运行它

t = KillableThread(sleep_interval=5)
t.start()
# Every 5 seconds it prints:
#: Do Something
t.kill()
#: Killing Thread

使用wait()而不是sleep()ing和定期检查事件的优点是，您可以在更长的睡眠间隔中编程，线程几乎立即停止(否则您将处于sleep()ing)，并且在我看来，处理退出的代码明显更简单。

这是基于thread2—可杀死线程ActiveState配方。

您需要调用PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc()，它只能通过ctypes模块使用。

这只在Python 2.7.3上进行了测试，但它很可能与最近的其他2一起工作。x版本。PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc()仍然存在于Python 3中以实现向后兼容性(但我还没有测试它)。

import ctypes

def terminate_thread(thread):
    """Terminates a python thread from another thread.

    :param thread: a threading.Thread instance
    """
    if not thread.isAlive():
        return

    exc = ctypes.py_object(SystemExit)
    res = ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(
        ctypes.c_long(thread.ident), exc)
    if res == 0:
        raise ValueError("nonexistent thread id")
    elif res > 1:
        # """if it returns a number greater than one, you're in trouble,
        # and you should call it again with exc=NULL to revert the effect"""
        ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(thread.ident, None)
        raise SystemError("PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc failed")

在Python和任何语言中，突然终止线程通常都是一种糟糕的模式。考虑以下情况:

线程持有一个必须正确关闭的关键资源 线程创建了其他几个线程，这些线程也必须被杀死。

如果你能负担得起(如果你在管理自己的线程)，处理这个问题的好方法是有一个exit_request标志，每个线程都会定期检查它，看看它是否到了退出的时候。

例如:

import threading

class StoppableThread(threading.Thread):
    """Thread class with a stop() method. The thread itself has to check
    regularly for the stopped() condition."""

    def __init__(self,  *args, **kwargs):
        super(StoppableThread, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
        self._stop_event = threading.Event()

    def stop(self):
        self._stop_event.set()

    def stopped(self):
        return self._stop_event.is_set()

在这段代码中，当您希望线程退出时，应该在线程上调用stop()，并使用join()等待线程正确退出。线程应该定期检查停止标志。

然而，在某些情况下，您确实需要终止一个线程。例如，当您正在包装一个外部库时，该库正忙于长时间的调用，并且您希望中断它。

下面的代码允许(有一些限制)在Python线程中引发异常:

def _async_raise(tid, exctype):
    '''Raises an exception in the threads with id tid'''
    if not inspect.isclass(exctype):
        raise TypeError("Only types can be raised (not instances)")
    res = ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(ctypes.c_long(tid),
                                                     ctypes.py_object(exctype))
    if res == 0:
        raise ValueError("invalid thread id")
    elif res != 1:
        # "if it returns a number greater than one, you're in trouble,
        # and you should call it again with exc=NULL to revert the effect"
        ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(ctypes.c_long(tid), None)
        raise SystemError("PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc failed")

class ThreadWithExc(threading.Thread):
    '''A thread class that supports raising an exception in the thread from
       another thread.
    '''
    def _get_my_tid(self):
        """determines this (self's) thread id

        CAREFUL: this function is executed in the context of the caller
        thread, to get the identity of the thread represented by this
        instance.
        """
        if not self.isAlive():
            raise threading.ThreadError("the thread is not active")

        # do we have it cached?
        if hasattr(self, "_thread_id"):
            return self._thread_id

        # no, look for it in the _active dict
        for tid, tobj in threading._active.items():
            if tobj is self:
                self._thread_id = tid
                return tid

        # TODO: in python 2.6, there's a simpler way to do: self.ident

        raise AssertionError("could not determine the thread's id")

    def raiseExc(self, exctype):
        """Raises the given exception type in the context of this thread.

        If the thread is busy in a system call (time.sleep(),
        socket.accept(), ...), the exception is simply ignored.

        If you are sure that your exception should terminate the thread,
        one way to ensure that it works is:

            t = ThreadWithExc( ... )
            ...
            t.raiseExc( SomeException )
            while t.isAlive():
                time.sleep( 0.1 )
                t.raiseExc( SomeException )

        If the exception is to be caught by the thread, you need a way to
        check that your thread has caught it.

        CAREFUL: this function is executed in the context of the
        caller thread, to raise an exception in the context of the
        thread represented by this instance.
        """
        _async_raise( self._get_my_tid(), exctype )

(根据Tomer Filiba的《Killable Threads》改编。关于PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc返回值的引用似乎来自旧版本的Python。)

正如文档中所指出的，这不是一个神奇的子弹，因为如果线程在Python解释器之外忙，它将不会捕获中断。

这段代码的一个良好使用模式是让线程捕获特定的异常并执行清理。这样，您可以中断任务，但仍然可以进行适当的清理。

在Python中，你不能直接杀死一个线程。

如果你不是真的需要Thread(!)，你可以做的，而不是使用threading包，是使用 多处理包。在这里，要终止一个进程，你可以简单地调用方法:

yourProcess.terminate()  # kill the process!

Python将终止您的进程(在Unix上通过SIGTERM信号，而在Windows上通过TerminateProcess()调用)。注意在使用队列或管道时使用它!(可能会破坏队列/管道中的数据)

注意，多处理。事件和多处理。信号量的工作方式与线程完全相同。事件和线程。信号量分别。事实上，前者是后者的克隆。

如果你真的需要使用一个线程，没有办法直接杀死它。但是，您可以使用“守护线程”。事实上，在Python中，线程可以被标记为守护进程:

yourThread.daemon = True  # set the Thread as a "daemon thread"

当没有活动的非守护进程线程时，主程序将退出。换句话说，当主线程(当然是非守护线程)完成其操作时，即使仍有一些守护线程在工作，程序也将退出。

注意，在调用start()方法之前，有必要将线程设置为守护进程!

当然，你可以，也应该在多进程中使用daemon。在这里，当主进程退出时，它将尝试终止其所有守护子进程。

最后，请注意sys.exit()和os.kill()不是选项。

虽然它相当古老，但对一些人来说这可能是一个方便的解决方案:

一个扩展线程模块功能的小模块—— 允许一个线程在另一个线程的上下文中引发异常 线程。通过触发SystemExit，你最终可以杀死python线程。

import threading
import ctypes     

def _async_raise(tid, excobj):
    res = ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(tid, ctypes.py_object(excobj))
    if res == 0:
        raise ValueError("nonexistent thread id")
    elif res > 1:
        # """if it returns a number greater than one, you're in trouble, 
        # and you should call it again with exc=NULL to revert the effect"""
        ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(tid, 0)
        raise SystemError("PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc failed")

class Thread(threading.Thread):
    def raise_exc(self, excobj):
        assert self.isAlive(), "thread must be started"
        for tid, tobj in threading._active.items():
            if tobj is self:
                _async_raise(tid, excobj)
                return

        # the thread was alive when we entered the loop, but was not found 
        # in the dict, hence it must have been already terminated. should we raise
        # an exception here? silently ignore?

    def terminate(self):
        # must raise the SystemExit type, instead of a SystemExit() instance
        # due to a bug in PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc
        self.raise_exc(SystemExit)

因此，它允许“线程在另一个线程的上下文中引发异常”，通过这种方式，被终止的线程可以处理终止，而无需定期检查中止标志。

然而，根据其原始来源，这段代码有一些问题。

The exception will be raised only when executing python bytecode. If your thread calls a native/built-in blocking function, the exception will be raised only when execution returns to the python code. There is also an issue if the built-in function internally calls PyErr_Clear(), which would effectively cancel your pending exception. You can try to raise it again. Only exception types can be raised safely. Exception instances are likely to cause unexpected behavior, and are thus restricted. For example: t1.raise_exc(TypeError) and not t1.raise_exc(TypeError("blah")). IMHO it's a bug, and I reported it as one. For more info, http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068158.html I asked to expose this function in the built-in thread module, but since ctypes has become a standard library (as of 2.5), and this feature is not likely to be implementation-agnostic, it may be kept unexposed.