假设，你想有多个线程的同一个函数，这是IMHO最简单的实现通过id停止一个:

import time
from threading import Thread

def doit(id=0):
    doit.stop=0
    print("start id:%d"%id)
    while 1:
        time.sleep(1)
        print(".")
        if doit.stop==id:
            doit.stop=0
            break
    print("end thread %d"%id)

t5=Thread(target=doit, args=(5,))
t6=Thread(target=doit, args=(6,))

t5.start() ; t6.start()
time.sleep(2)
doit.stop =5  #kill t5
time.sleep(2)
doit.stop =6  #kill t6

这里的好处是，你可以有多个相同或不同的函数，并通过functionname。stop来停止它们

如果你想只有一个线程的函数，那么你不需要记住id。如果做了，就停下来。停止> 0。

我想补充的一件事是，如果你阅读threading lib Python的官方文档，建议避免使用“恶魔”线程，当你不希望线程突然结束时，带有Paolo Rovelli提到的标志。

来自官方文件:

守护进程线程在关机时突然停止。它们的资源(如打开的文件、数据库事务等)可能无法正确释放。如果您希望线程优雅地停止，请将它们设置为非守护进程，并使用适当的信号机制(如Event)。

我认为创建守护线程取决于您的应用程序，但通常(在我看来)最好避免杀死它们或使它们成为守护线程。在多处理中，您可以使用is_alive()来检查进程状态，并使用“terminate”来完成它们(也可以避免GIL问题)。但有时，当你在Windows中执行代码时，你会发现更多的问题。

并且永远记住，如果你有“活动线程”，Python解释器将运行等待它们。(因为这个守护程序可以帮助你如果不重要的事情突然结束)。

我对这个游戏已经很晚了，但我一直在与一个类似的问题作斗争，下面的内容似乎为我完美地解决了这个问题，并且让我在守护子线程退出时做一些基本的线程状态检查和清理:

import threading
import time
import atexit

def do_work():

  i = 0
  @atexit.register
  def goodbye():
    print ("'CLEANLY' kill sub-thread with value: %s [THREAD: %s]" %
           (i, threading.currentThread().ident))

  while True:
    print i
    i += 1
    time.sleep(1)

t = threading.Thread(target=do_work)
t.daemon = True
t.start()

def after_timeout():
  print "KILL MAIN THREAD: %s" % threading.currentThread().ident
  raise SystemExit

threading.Timer(2, after_timeout).start()

收益率:

0
1
KILL MAIN THREAD: 140013208254208
'CLEANLY' kill sub-thread with value: 2 [THREAD: 140013674317568]

这是基于thread2—可杀死线程ActiveState配方。

您需要调用PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc()，它只能通过ctypes模块使用。

这只在Python 2.7.3上进行了测试，但它很可能与最近的其他2一起工作。x版本。PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc()仍然存在于Python 3中以实现向后兼容性(但我还没有测试它)。

import ctypes

def terminate_thread(thread):
    """Terminates a python thread from another thread.

    :param thread: a threading.Thread instance
    """
    if not thread.isAlive():
        return

    exc = ctypes.py_object(SystemExit)
    res = ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(
        ctypes.c_long(thread.ident), exc)
    if res == 0:
        raise ValueError("nonexistent thread id")
    elif res > 1:
        # """if it returns a number greater than one, you're in trouble,
        # and you should call it again with exc=NULL to revert the effect"""
        ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(thread.ident, None)
        raise SystemError("PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc failed")

另一种方法是使用signal.pthread_kill发送一个停止信号。

from signal import pthread_kill, SIGTSTP
from threading import Thread
from itertools import count
from time import sleep

def target():
    for num in count():
        print(num)
        sleep(1)

thread = Thread(target=target)
thread.start()
sleep(5)
pthread_kill(thread.ident, SIGTSTP)

结果

0
1
2
3
4

[14]+  Stopped

虽然它相当古老，但对一些人来说这可能是一个方便的解决方案:

一个扩展线程模块功能的小模块—— 允许一个线程在另一个线程的上下文中引发异常 线程。通过触发SystemExit，你最终可以杀死python线程。

import threading
import ctypes     

def _async_raise(tid, excobj):
    res = ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(tid, ctypes.py_object(excobj))
    if res == 0:
        raise ValueError("nonexistent thread id")
    elif res > 1:
        # """if it returns a number greater than one, you're in trouble, 
        # and you should call it again with exc=NULL to revert the effect"""
        ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(tid, 0)
        raise SystemError("PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc failed")

class Thread(threading.Thread):
    def raise_exc(self, excobj):
        assert self.isAlive(), "thread must be started"
        for tid, tobj in threading._active.items():
            if tobj is self:
                _async_raise(tid, excobj)
                return

        # the thread was alive when we entered the loop, but was not found 
        # in the dict, hence it must have been already terminated. should we raise
        # an exception here? silently ignore?

    def terminate(self):
        # must raise the SystemExit type, instead of a SystemExit() instance
        # due to a bug in PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc
        self.raise_exc(SystemExit)

因此，它允许“线程在另一个线程的上下文中引发异常”，通过这种方式，被终止的线程可以处理终止，而无需定期检查中止标志。

然而，根据其原始来源，这段代码有一些问题。

The exception will be raised only when executing python bytecode. If your thread calls a native/built-in blocking function, the exception will be raised only when execution returns to the python code. There is also an issue if the built-in function internally calls PyErr_Clear(), which would effectively cancel your pending exception. You can try to raise it again. Only exception types can be raised safely. Exception instances are likely to cause unexpected behavior, and are thus restricted. For example: t1.raise_exc(TypeError) and not t1.raise_exc(TypeError("blah")). IMHO it's a bug, and I reported it as one. For more info, http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068158.html I asked to expose this function in the built-in thread module, but since ctypes has become a standard library (as of 2.5), and this feature is not likely to be implementation-agnostic, it may be kept unexposed.