圆中的面积元是dA=rdr*dphi。这个额外的因子r破坏了你随机选择r和的想法。虽然phi分布平坦，但r不是，而是在1/r内平坦(也就是说，你更有可能击中边界而不是“靶心”)。

为了生成在圆上均匀分布的点从平面分布中选取r从1/r分布中选取。

或者使用Mehrdad提出的蒙特卡罗方法。

EDIT

要在1/r中选择一个随机的r，你可以从区间[1/ r，无穷]中选择一个随机的x，并计算r=1/x。R以1/ R为单位平坦分布。

为了计算一个随机的，从区间[0,1]中选择一个随机的x，并计算=2*pi*x。

这取决于你对"均匀随机"的定义。这是一个微妙的点，你可以在这里的wiki页面上阅读更多关于它的内容:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_paradox_%28probability%29，在这里同样的问题，对“均匀随机”给出不同的解释会给出不同的答案!

根据你如何选择这些点，分布可能会有所不同，即使它们在某种意义上是均匀随机的。

It seems like the blog entry is trying to make it uniformly random in the following sense: If you take a sub-circle of the circle, with the same center, then the probability that the point falls in that region is proportional to the area of the region. That, I believe, is attempting to follow the now standard interpretation of 'uniformly random' for 2D regions with areas defined on them: probability of a point falling in any region (with area well defined) is proportional to the area of that region.

圆中的面积元是dA=rdr*dphi。这个额外的因子r破坏了你随机选择r和的想法。虽然phi分布平坦，但r不是，而是在1/r内平坦(也就是说，你更有可能击中边界而不是“靶心”)。

为了生成在圆上均匀分布的点从平面分布中选取r从1/r分布中选取。

或者使用Mehrdad提出的蒙特卡罗方法。

EDIT

要在1/r中选择一个随机的r，你可以从区间[1/ r，无穷]中选择一个随机的x，并计算r=1/x。R以1/ R为单位平坦分布。

为了计算一个随机的，从区间[0,1]中选择一个随机的x，并计算=2*pi*x。

我曾经用过这个方法: 这可能是完全未优化的(即它使用了一个点数组，所以它不能用于大圆圈)，但它提供了足够的随机分布。如果你愿意，你可以跳过矩阵的创建，直接绘制。方法是随机化矩形中落在圆内的所有点。

bool[,] getMatrix(System.Drawing.Rectangle r) {
    bool[,] matrix = new bool[r.Width, r.Height];
    return matrix;
}

void fillMatrix(ref bool[,] matrix, Vector center) {
    double radius = center.X;
    Random r = new Random();
    for (int y = 0; y < matrix.GetLength(0); y++) {
        for (int x = 0; x < matrix.GetLength(1); x++)
        {
            double distance = (center - new Vector(x, y)).Length;
            if (distance < radius) {
                matrix[x, y] = r.NextDouble() > 0.5;
            }
        }
    }

}

private void drawMatrix(Vector centerPoint, double radius, bool[,] matrix) {
    var g = this.CreateGraphics();

    Bitmap pixel = new Bitmap(1,1);
    pixel.SetPixel(0, 0, Color.Black);

    for (int y = 0; y < matrix.GetLength(0); y++)
    {
        for (int x = 0; x < matrix.GetLength(1); x++)
        {
            if (matrix[x, y]) {
                g.DrawImage(pixel, new PointF((float)(centerPoint.X - radius + x), (float)(centerPoint.Y - radius + y)));
            }
        }
    }

    g.Dispose();
}

private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    System.Drawing.Rectangle r = new System.Drawing.Rectangle(100,100,200,200);
    double radius = r.Width / 2;
    Vector center = new Vector(r.Left + radius, r.Top + radius);
    Vector normalizedCenter = new Vector(radius, radius);
    bool[,] matrix = getMatrix(r);
    fillMatrix(ref matrix, normalizedCenter);
    drawMatrix(center, radius, matrix);
}

注意点密度与半径的平方反比成正比，因此不是从[0,r_max]中选择r，而是从[0,r_max^2]中选择r，然后计算你的坐标:

x = sqrt(r) * cos(angle)
y = sqrt(r) * sin(angle)

这就得到了圆盘上均匀的点分布。

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DiskPointPicking.html

我仍然不确定确切的“(2/R2)×r”，但显而易见的是，在给定的单位“dr”中需要分配的点的数量，即r的增加将与R2成正比，而不是r。

check this way...number of points at some angle theta and between r (0.1r to 0.2r) i.e. fraction of the r and number of points between r (0.6r to 0.7r) would be equal if you use standard generation, since the difference is only 0.1r between two intervals. but since area covered between points (0.6r to 0.7r) will be much larger than area covered between 0.1r to 0.2r, the equal number of points will be sparsely spaced in larger area, this I assume you already know, So the function to generate the random points must not be linear but quadratic, (since number of points required to be distributed in given unit 'dr' i.e. increase in r will be proportional to r2 and not r), so in this case it will be inverse of quadratic, since the delta we have (0.1r) in both intervals must be square of some function so it can act as seed value for linear generation of points (since afterwords, this seed is used linearly in sin and cos function), so we know, dr must be quadratic value and to make this seed quadratic, we need to originate this values from square root of r not r itself, I hope this makes it little more clear.