深度复制和浅复制的区别是什么?
当前回答
什么是浅复制?
浅复制是对象的逐位复制。创建一个新对象,该对象具有原始对象中值的精确副本。如果对象的任何字段是对其他对象的引用,则只复制引用地址,即只复制内存地址。
In this figure, the MainObject1 has fields field1 of type int, and ContainObject1 of type ContainObject. When you do a shallow copy of MainObject1, MainObject2 is created with field2 containing the copied value of field1 and still pointing to ContainObject1 itself. Note that since field1 is of primitive type, its value is copied to field2 but since ContainedObject1 is an object, MainObject2 still points to ContainObject1. So any changes made to ContainObject1 in MainObject1 will be reflected in MainObject2.
如果这是浅复制,我们看看什么是深复制?
什么是深度复制?
深度复制复制所有字段,并复制由字段指向的动态分配的内存。当对象与其引用的对象一起复制时,就会发生深度复制。
在这个图中,MainObject1具有类型为int的字段field1和类型为ContainObject的字段ContainObject1。在对MainObject1进行深度复制时,MainObject2创建时,field2包含从field1复制的值,而ContainObject2包含从ContainObject1复制的值。注意,MainObject1中对ContainObject1所做的任何更改都不会反映在MainObject2中。
篇好文章
其他回答
我想给出一个例子,而不是正式的定义。
var originalObject = {
a : 1,
b : 2,
c : 3,
};
这段代码显示了一个浅拷贝:
var copyObject1 = originalObject;
console.log(copyObject1.a); // it will print 1
console.log(originalObject.a); // it will also print 1
copyObject1.a = 4;
console.log(copyObject1.a); //now it will print 4
console.log(originalObject.a); // now it will also print 4
var copyObject2 = Object.assign({}, originalObject);
console.log(copyObject2.a); // it will print 1
console.log(originalObject.a); // it will also print 1
copyObject2.a = 4;
console.log(copyObject2.a); // now it will print 4
console.log(originalObject.a); // now it will print 1
这段代码显示了一个深度拷贝:
var copyObject2 = Object.assign({}, originalObject);
console.log(copyObject2.a); // it will print 1
console.log(originalObject.a); // it will also print 1
copyObject2.a = 4;
console.log(copyObject2.a); // now it will print 4
console.log(originalObject.a); // !! now it will print 1 !!
为了补充其他答案,
对象的浅拷贝对值类型执行逐值复制 基于属性,并通过引用复制基于引用类型的属性。 对象的深度复制对基于值类型的对象执行逐值复制 属性,以及基于引用类型的按值复制 层次结构深处的属性(引用类型)
{想象两个对象:相同类型_t的A和B(相对于c++),你正在考虑将A浅/深复制到B}
浅拷贝: 简单地将a的引用复制到b中,把它看作是a的地址的副本。 因此,A和B的地址将是相同的,即它们将指向相同的内存位置,即数据内容。
Deep copy: Simply makes a copy of all the members of A, allocates memory in a different location for B and then assigns the copied members to B to achieve deep copy. In this way, if A becomes non-existant B is still valid in the memory. The correct term to use would be cloning, where you know that they both are totally the same, but yet different (i.e. stored as two different entities in the memory space). You can also provide your clone wrapper where you can decide via inclusion/exclusion list which properties to select during deep copy. This is quite a common practice when you create APIs.
只有当你了解其中的利害关系时,你才可以选择做浅拷贝。当你在c++或C中有大量的指针要处理时,做一个对象的浅拷贝真的是一个坏主意。
EXAMPLE_OF_DEEP COPY_ An example is, when you are trying to do image processing and object recognition you need to mask "Irrelevant and Repetitive Motion" out of your processing areas. If you are using image pointers, then you might have the specification to save those mask images. NOW... if you do a shallow copy of the image, when the pointer references are KILLED from the stack, you lost the reference and its copy i.e. there will be a runtime error of access violation at some point. In this case, what you need is a deep copy of your image by CLONING it. In this way you can retrieve the masks in case you need them in the future.
EXAMPLE_OF_SHALLOW_COPY I am not extremely knowledgeable compared to the users in StackOverflow so feel free to delete this part and put a good example if you can clarify. But I really think it is not a good idea to do shallow copy if you know that your program is gonna run for an infinite period of time i.e. continuous "push-pop" operation over the stack with function calls. If you are demonstrating something to an amateur or novice person (e.g. C/C++ tutorial stuff) then it is probably okay. But if you are running an application such as surveillance and detection system, or Sonar Tracking System, you are not supposed to keep shallow copying your objects around because it will kill your program sooner or later.
浅拷贝构造一个新的复合对象,并将其对原始对象的引用插入其中。
与浅拷贝不同,deepcopy构造新的复合对象,并插入原复合对象的原对象副本。
让我们举个例子。
import copy
x =[1,[2]]
y=copy.copy(x)
z= copy.deepcopy(x)
print(y is z)
上面的代码输出FALSE。
让我们看看怎么做。
原始复合对象x=[1,[2]](称为复合,因为它在对象中有对象(Inception))
如图所示,列表中有一个列表。
然后使用y = copy.copy(x)创建它的浅拷贝。python在这里所做的是,它将创建一个新的复合对象,但其中的对象指向原始对象。
在图像中,它为外层列表创建了一个新的副本。但内部列表与原始列表保持一致。
现在我们使用z = copy.deepcopy(x)创建它的深度复制。python在这里所做的是,它将为外部列表和内部列表创建新对象。如下图所示(红色高亮部分)。
最后代码输出False,因为y和z不是相同的对象。
HTH.
我在这里没有看到一个简短的,容易理解的答案——所以我会试一试。
使用浅拷贝,源指向的任何对象也会被目标指向(因此不会复制引用的对象)。
使用深度复制,源指向的任何对象都将被复制,而目标指向的副本(因此现在每个引用的对象都有2个)。这是递归向下的对象树。