我收到消息说“NUnit文件结构比VSTest更丰富”… 当然，如果你更喜欢NUnit的文件结构，你可以使用这个解决方案的另一种方式，像这样(NUnit→Visual Studio):

 #if !MSTEST
     using NUnit.Framework;
 #else
     using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
     using TestFixture = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestClassAttribute;
     using Test = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestMethodAttribute;
     using SetUp = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestInitializeAttribute;
     using TearDown = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestCleanupAttribute;
 #endif

或任何其他转换…:-)这里的用法只是编译器的别名。

xUnit是新项目的另一种可能。它的语法可能更直观，但它与其他框架并不兼容。

如果你正在考虑MSTest或NUnit，那么我建议你看看MbUnit。我的理由是

TestDriven.Net compatibility. Nothing beats have TestDriven.Net.ReRunWithDebugger bound to a keyboard combination. The Gallio framework. Gallio is a test runner like NUnit's. The only difference is it doesn't care if you wrote your tests in NUnit, MSTest, xUnit or MbUnit. They all get run. Compatibility with NUnit. All features in NUnit are supported by MbUnit. I think you don't even need to change your attributes (will have to check that), just your reference and usings. Collection asserts. MbUnit has more Assert cases, including the CollectionAssert class. Basically you no longer need to write your own tests to see if two collections are the same. Combinatorial tests. Wouldn't it be cool if you could supply two sets of data and get a test for all the combinations of data? It is in MbUnit.

我最初选择MbUnit是因为它的[RowTest ....我找不到一个回去的理由。我把我所有的活动测试套件从NUnit移过来，再也没有回头。从那时起，我已经将两个不同的开发团队转换为收益。

我收到消息说“NUnit文件结构比VSTest更丰富”… 当然，如果你更喜欢NUnit的文件结构，你可以使用这个解决方案的另一种方式，像这样(NUnit→Visual Studio):

 #if !MSTEST
     using NUnit.Framework;
 #else
     using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
     using TestFixture = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestClassAttribute;
     using Test = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestMethodAttribute;
     using SetUp = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestInitializeAttribute;
     using TearDown = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestCleanupAttribute;
 #endif

或任何其他转换…:-)这里的用法只是编译器的别名。

单元测试框架实际上并不重要，因为你可以用单独的项目文件和条件编译转换测试类(就像这样，Visual Studio→NUnit):

 #if !NUNIT
  using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
 #else
  using NUnit.Framework;
  using TestClass = NUnit.Framework.TestFixtureAttribute;
  using TestMethod = NUnit.Framework.TestAttribute;
  using TestInitialize = NUnit.Framework.SetUpAttribute;
  using TestCleanup = NUnit.Framework.TearDownAttribute;
  using TestContext = System.String;
  using DeploymentItem = NUnit.Framework.DescriptionAttribute;
 #endif

TestDriven。Net插件很好，不是很贵…对于普通的Visual Studio 2008，你必须从你的测试类或测试列表中找到测试。TestDriven。Net中，您可以直接从正在测试的类中运行测试。毕竟，单元测试应该易于维护，并且离开发人员很近。

Visual Studio 2008内置单元测试框架的优点/变化:

The 2008 version now is available in professional editions (before it required expensive versions of Visual Studio, and this is just for developer unit testing) that left a lot of developers with the only choice of open/external testing frameworks. Built-in API supported by a single company. Use the same tools to to run and create tests (you may run them using the command line also MSTest). Simple design (granted without a mock framework, but this is a great starting point for many programmers). Long term support granted (I still remember what happened to NDoc, and I don't want to commit to a testing framework that might not be supported in five years, but I still consider NUnit a great framework). If using Team Foundation Server as your backend, you can create work items or bugs with the failed test data in a simple fashion.