我只是创建了简单的枚举

val args: Array[String] = "-silent -samples 100 -silent".split(" +").toArray
                                              //> args  : Array[String] = Array(-silent, -samples, 100, -silent)
object Opts extends Enumeration {

    class OptVal extends Val {
        override def toString = "-" + super.toString
    }

    val nopar, silent = new OptVal() { // boolean options
        def apply(): Boolean = args.contains(toString)
    }

    val samples, maxgen = new OptVal() { // integer options
        def apply(default: Int) = { val i = args.indexOf(toString) ;  if (i == -1) default else args(i+1).toInt}
        def apply(): Int = apply(-1)
    }
}

Opts.nopar()                              //> res0: Boolean = false
Opts.silent()                             //> res1: Boolean = true
Opts.samples()                            //> res2: Int = 100
Opts.maxgen()                             //> res3: Int = -1

我知道这个解决方案有两个主要的缺陷可能会让你分心:它消除了自由(即对其他库的依赖，你非常重视)和冗余(DRY原则，你只输入一次选项名称，作为Scala程序变量，并在第二次输入命令行文本时消除它)。

另一个库:scarg

我喜欢joslinm的slide()方法，而不是可变的vars;)这里有一个不可改变的方法:

case class AppArgs(
              seed1: String,
              seed2: String,
              ip: String,
              port: Int
              )
object AppArgs {
  def empty = new AppArgs("", "", "", 0)
}

val args = Array[String](
  "--seed1", "akka.tcp://seed1",
  "--seed2", "akka.tcp://seed2",
  "--nodeip", "192.167.1.1",
  "--nodeport", "2551"
)

val argsInstance = args.sliding(2, 1).toList.foldLeft(AppArgs.empty) { case (accumArgs, currArgs) => currArgs match {
    case Array("--seed1", seed1) => accumArgs.copy(seed1 = seed1)
    case Array("--seed2", seed2) => accumArgs.copy(seed2 = seed2)
    case Array("--nodeip", ip) => accumArgs.copy(ip = ip)
    case Array("--nodeport", port) => accumArgs.copy(port = port.toInt)
    case unknownArg => accumArgs // Do whatever you want for this case
  }
}

我从来都不喜欢ruby那样的选项解析器。大多数使用它们的开发人员从来没有为他们的脚本编写合适的手册页，并且由于解析器的原因，最终会以没有以适当的方式组织的数页长的选项结束。

我一直喜欢用Perl的Getopt::Long来做事情。

我正在研究它的scala实现。早期的API看起来是这样的:

def print_version() = () => println("version is 0.2")

def main(args: Array[String]) {
  val (options, remaining) = OptionParser.getOptions(args,
    Map(
      "-f|--flag"       -> 'flag,
      "-s|--string=s"   -> 'string,
      "-i|--int=i"      -> 'int,
      "-f|--float=f"    -> 'double,
      "-p|-procedure=p" -> { () => println("higher order function" }
      "-h=p"            -> { () => print_synopsis() }
      "--help|--man=p"  -> { () => launch_manpage() },
      "--version=p"     -> print_version,
    ))

像这样调用脚本:

$ script hello -f --string=mystring -i 7 --float 3.14 --p --version world -- --nothing

将打印:

higher order function
version is 0.2

并返回:

remaining = Array("hello", "world", "--nothing")

options = Map('flag   -> true,
              'string -> "mystring",
              'int    -> 7,
              'double -> 3.14)

该项目托管在github scala-getoptions中。

我喜欢这段代码的简洁外观…从这里的讨论中收集到: http://www.scala-lang.org/old/node/4380

object ArgParser {
  val usage = """
Usage: parser [-v] [-f file] [-s sopt] ...
Where: -v   Run verbosely
       -f F Set input file to F
       -s S Set Show option to S
"""

  var filename: String = ""
  var showme: String = ""
  var debug: Boolean = false
  val unknown = "(^-[^\\s])".r

  val pf: PartialFunction[List[String], List[String]] = {
    case "-v" :: tail => debug = true; tail
    case "-f" :: (arg: String) :: tail => filename = arg; tail
    case "-s" :: (arg: String) :: tail => showme = arg; tail
    case unknown(bad) :: tail => die("unknown argument " + bad + "\n" + usage)
  }

  def main(args: Array[String]) {
    // if there are required args:
    if (args.length == 0) die()
    val arglist = args.toList
    val remainingopts = parseArgs(arglist,pf)

    println("debug=" + debug)
    println("showme=" + showme)
    println("filename=" + filename)
    println("remainingopts=" + remainingopts)
  }

  def parseArgs(args: List[String], pf: PartialFunction[List[String], List[String]]): List[String] = args match {
    case Nil => Nil
    case _ => if (pf isDefinedAt args) parseArgs(pf(args),pf) else args.head :: parseArgs(args.tail,pf)
  }

  def die(msg: String = usage) = {
    println(msg)
    sys.exit(1)
  }

}

命令行接口Scala Toolkit (CLIST)

这也是我的!(虽然有点晚了)

https://github.com/backuity/clist

与scopt相反，它是完全可变的…但是等等!这给了我们一个很好的语法:

class Cat extends Command(description = "concatenate files and print on the standard output") {

  // type-safety: members are typed! so showAll is a Boolean
  var showAll        = opt[Boolean](abbrev = "A", description = "equivalent to -vET")
  var numberNonblank = opt[Boolean](abbrev = "b", description = "number nonempty output lines, overrides -n")

  // files is a Seq[File]
  var files          = args[Seq[File]](description = "files to concat")
}

还有一个简单的运行方法:

Cli.parse(args).withCommand(new Cat) { case cat =>
    println(cat.files)
}

当然，您可以做更多的事情(多命令，许多配置选项，……)，并且没有依赖性。

我将以一种独特的特性来结束，默认用法(对于多个命令经常被忽略):