对于相对简单的配置，我喜欢滑动参数。

var name = ""
var port = 0
var ip = ""
args.sliding(2, 2).toList.collect {
  case Array("--ip", argIP: String) => ip = argIP
  case Array("--port", argPort: String) => port = argPort.toInt
  case Array("--name", argName: String) => name = argName
}

我已经尝试概括@pjotrp的解决方案，通过在必要的位置键符号的列表，一个映射的标志->键符号和默认选项:

def parseOptions(args: List[String], required: List[Symbol], optional: Map[String, Symbol], options: Map[Symbol, String]): Map[Symbol, String] = {
  args match {
    // Empty list
    case Nil => options

    // Keyword arguments
    case key :: value :: tail if optional.get(key) != None =>
      parseOptions(tail, required, optional, options ++ Map(optional(key) -> value))

    // Positional arguments
    case value :: tail if required != Nil =>
      parseOptions(tail, required.tail, optional, options ++ Map(required.head -> value))

    // Exit if an unknown argument is received
    case _ =>
      printf("unknown argument(s): %s\n", args.mkString(", "))
      sys.exit(1)
  }
}

def main(sysargs Array[String]) {
  // Required positional arguments by key in options
  val required = List('arg1, 'arg2)

  // Optional arguments by flag which map to a key in options
  val optional = Map("--flag1" -> 'flag1, "--flag2" -> 'flag2)

  // Default options that are passed in
  var defaultOptions = Map()

  // Parse options based on the command line args
  val options = parseOptions(sysargs.toList, required, optional, defaultOptions)
}

对于相对简单的配置，我喜欢滑动参数。

var name = ""
var port = 0
var ip = ""
args.sliding(2, 2).toList.collect {
  case Array("--ip", argIP: String) => ip = argIP
  case Array("--port", argPort: String) => port = argPort.toInt
  case Array("--name", argName: String) => name = argName
}

我喜欢joslinm的slide()方法，而不是可变的vars;)这里有一个不可改变的方法:

case class AppArgs(
              seed1: String,
              seed2: String,
              ip: String,
              port: Int
              )
object AppArgs {
  def empty = new AppArgs("", "", "", 0)
}

val args = Array[String](
  "--seed1", "akka.tcp://seed1",
  "--seed2", "akka.tcp://seed2",
  "--nodeip", "192.167.1.1",
  "--nodeport", "2551"
)

val argsInstance = args.sliding(2, 1).toList.foldLeft(AppArgs.empty) { case (accumArgs, currArgs) => currArgs match {
    case Array("--seed1", seed1) => accumArgs.copy(seed1 = seed1)
    case Array("--seed2", seed2) => accumArgs.copy(seed2 = seed2)
    case Array("--nodeip", ip) => accumArgs.copy(ip = ip)
    case Array("--nodeport", port) => accumArgs.copy(port = port.toInt)
    case unknownArg => accumArgs // Do whatever you want for this case
  }
}

还有JCommander(免责声明:我创建了它):

object Main {
  object Args {
    @Parameter(
      names = Array("-f", "--file"),
      description = "File to load. Can be specified multiple times.")
    var file: java.util.List[String] = null
  }

  def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
    new JCommander(Args, args.toArray: _*)
    for (filename <- Args.file) {
      val f = new File(filename)
      printf("file: %s\n", f.getName)
    }
  }
}

我从来都不喜欢ruby那样的选项解析器。大多数使用它们的开发人员从来没有为他们的脚本编写合适的手册页，并且由于解析器的原因，最终会以没有以适当的方式组织的数页长的选项结束。

我一直喜欢用Perl的Getopt::Long来做事情。

我正在研究它的scala实现。早期的API看起来是这样的:

def print_version() = () => println("version is 0.2")

def main(args: Array[String]) {
  val (options, remaining) = OptionParser.getOptions(args,
    Map(
      "-f|--flag"       -> 'flag,
      "-s|--string=s"   -> 'string,
      "-i|--int=i"      -> 'int,
      "-f|--float=f"    -> 'double,
      "-p|-procedure=p" -> { () => println("higher order function" }
      "-h=p"            -> { () => print_synopsis() }
      "--help|--man=p"  -> { () => launch_manpage() },
      "--version=p"     -> print_version,
    ))

像这样调用脚本:

$ script hello -f --string=mystring -i 7 --float 3.14 --p --version world -- --nothing

将打印:

higher order function
version is 0.2

并返回:

remaining = Array("hello", "world", "--nothing")

options = Map('flag   -> true,
              'string -> "mystring",
              'int    -> 7,
              'double -> 3.14)

该项目托管在github scala-getoptions中。