就我个人而言，我喜欢绑定操作符::的建议，然后将其与@d13提到的解决方案结合起来，但现在坚持使用@d13的答案，在这里您为类使用export关键字，并将私有函数放在模块中。

还有一个棘手的解决方案，这里没有提到，下面是更实用的方法，将允许它在类中拥有所有的私有道具/方法。

Private.js

export const get = state => key => state[key];
export const set = state => (key,value) => { state[key] = value; }

. js

import { get, set } from './utils/Private'
export default class Test {
  constructor(initialState = {}) {
    const _set = this.set = set(initialState);
    const _get = this.get = get(initialState);

    this.set('privateMethod', () => _get('propValue'));
  }

  showProp() {
    return this.get('privateMethod')();
  }
}

let one = new Test({ propValue: 5});
let two = new Test({ propValue: 8});
two.showProp(); // 8
one.showProp(); // 5

请对此提出意见。

在JS中获得真正隐私的唯一方法是通过作用域，因此不可能有一个属性是this的成员，只能在组件内部访问。在ES6中存储真正私有数据的最佳方法是使用WeakMap。

const privateProp1 = new WeakMap();
const privateProp2 = new WeakMap();

class SomeClass {
  constructor() {
    privateProp1.set(this, "I am Private1");
    privateProp2.set(this, "I am Private2");

    this.publicVar = "I am public";
    this.publicMethod = () => {
      console.log(privateProp1.get(this), privateProp2.get(this))
    };        
  }

  printPrivate() {
    console.log(privateProp1.get(this));
  }
}

显然，这可能是一个缓慢的，肯定是丑陋的，但它确实提供了隐私。

请记住，即使这样也不是完美的，因为Javascript是动态的。有人仍然可以这样做

var oldSet = WeakMap.prototype.set;
WeakMap.prototype.set = function(key, value){
    // Store 'this', 'key', and 'value'
    return oldSet.call(this, key, value);
};

为了在值被存储时捕获它们，所以如果你想格外小心的话，你需要捕获一个对.set和.get的本地引用来显式使用，而不是依赖于可覆盖的原型。

const {set: WMSet, get: WMGet} = WeakMap.prototype;

const privateProp1 = new WeakMap();
const privateProp2 = new WeakMap();

class SomeClass {
  constructor() {
    WMSet.call(privateProp1, this, "I am Private1");
    WMSet.call(privateProp2, this, "I am Private2");

    this.publicVar = "I am public";
    this.publicMethod = () => {
      console.log(WMGet.call(privateProp1, this), WMGet.call(privateProp2, this))
    };        
  }

  printPrivate() {
    console.log(WMGet.call(privateProp1, this));
  }
}

我用这个模式，它总是对我有效

class Test { constructor(data) { class Public { constructor(prv) { // public function (must be in constructor on order to access "prv" variable) connectToDb(ip) { prv._db(ip, prv._err); } } // public function w/o access to "prv" variable log() { console.log("I'm logging"); } } // private variables this._data = data; this._err = function(ip) { console.log("could not connect to "+ip); } } // private function _db(ip, err) { if(!!ip) { console.log("connected to "+ip+", sending data '"+this.data+"'"); return true; } else err(ip); } } var test = new Test(10), ip = "185.167.210.49"; test.connectToDb(ip); // true test.log(); // I'm logging test._err(ip); // undefined test._db(ip, function() { console.log("You have got hacked!"); }); // undefined

来这个派对很晚，但我在搜索中碰到了OP问题，所以… 是的，您可以通过将类声明包装在闭包中来拥有私有属性

这里有一个我如何在这个代码依赖中拥有私有方法的例子。在下面的代码片段中，Subscribable类有两个“私有”函数process和processCallbacks。任何属性都可以以这种方式添加，并且通过使用闭包将它们保持为私有。如果关注点被很好地分离，并且Javascript不需要通过添加更多的语法而变得臃肿，当闭包整齐地完成工作时，隐私是一个罕见的需求。

const Subscribable = (function(){

  const process = (self, eventName, args) => {
    self.processing.set(eventName, setTimeout(() => processCallbacks(self, eventName, args)))};

  const processCallbacks = (self, eventName, args) => {
    if (self.callingBack.get(eventName).length > 0){
      const [nextCallback, ...callingBack] = self.callingBack.get(eventName);
      self.callingBack.set(eventName, callingBack);
      process(self, eventName, args);
      nextCallback(...args)}
    else {
      delete self.processing.delete(eventName)}};

  return class {
    constructor(){
      this.callingBack = new Map();
      this.processing = new Map();
      this.toCallbacks = new Map()}

    subscribe(eventName, callback){
      const callbacks = this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback);
      this.toCallbacks.set(eventName,  [...callbacks, callback]);
      return () => this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback)}  // callable to unsubscribe for convenience

    unsubscribe(eventName, callback){
      let callbacks = this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || [];
      callbacks = callbacks.filter(subscribedCallback => subscribedCallback !== callback);
      if (callbacks.length > 0) {
        this.toCallbacks.set(eventName, callbacks)}
      else {
        this.toCallbacks.delete(eventName)}
      return callbacks}

    emit(eventName, ...args){
      this.callingBack.set(eventName, this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || []);
      if (!this.processing.has(eventName)){
        process(this, eventName, args)}}}})();

我喜欢这种方法，因为它很好地分离了关注点，并保持了真正的私密性。唯一的缺点是需要使用'self'(或类似的东西)在私有内容中引用'this'。

我现在听到的建议是使用WeakMaps来保存私人数据，以供其他看客参考。

下面是一个更清晰、有效的例子:

function storePrivateProperties(a, b, c, d) {
  let privateData = new WeakMap;
  // unique object as key, weak map can only accept object as key, when key is no longer referened, garbage collector claims the key-value 
  let keyA = {}, keyB = {}, keyC = {}, keyD = {};

  privateData.set(keyA, a);
  privateData.set(keyB, b);
  privateData.set(keyC, c);
  privateData.set(keyD, d);

  return {
    logPrivateKey(key) {
      switch(key) {
      case "a":
        console.log(privateData.get(keyA));
        break;
      case "b":
        console.log(privateData.get(keyB));
        break;
      case "c":
        console.log(privateData.get(keyC));
        break;
      case "d":
        console.log(privateData.set(keyD));
        break;
      default:
        console.log(`There is no value for ${key}`)
      }
    }
  }
}

我已经开发了一个模块，帮助您使用的访问限制 JavaScript类，叫做Capsulable。(私有和受保护的静态)

如果您感兴趣，请查看下面的软件包。 https://github.com/hmmhmmhm/capsulable

const Capsulable = require('capsulable')
const Field = Capsulable()

class A {
    constructor(_field){
        // Configure data fields.
        Field(this, _field)

        // The code below provides access to
        // the data fields when creating
        // functions within the class.
        Field(this).private
        Field(this).protected
        Field(this).protectedStatic
    }
}

module.exports = A