是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
当前回答
根据ES2022,我们可以在JavaScript类中添加私有属性和方法。
我们可以通过在私有字段的名称前预先挂起#来定义它们。
演示:
类Something { #property = "test";//通过在属性名后面加上#,我们使它成为私有的。 } var instance = new Something(); console.log(实例。#产权);私有字段'#property'必须在一个外围类中声明
其他回答
甚至Typescript也做不到。从他们的文档来看:
当成员被标记为private时,就不能从其包含类的外部访问它。例如: 动物类{ 私有名称:字符串; 构造函数(名称:字符串){this.name =名称;} } 新的动物(猫). name;//错误:'name'是private;
但在他们的操场上,这说明:
var Animal = (function () {
function Animal(theName) {
this.name = theName;
}
return Animal;
}());
console.log(new Animal("Cat").name);
所以他们的“私人”关键字是无效的。
事实上,使用符号和代理是可能的。您可以使用类作用域中的符号,并在代理中设置两个陷阱:一个用于类原型,以便Reflect.ownKeys(实例)或Object。getOwnPropertySymbols不会泄露你的符号,另一个是构造函数本身,所以当调用new ClassName(attrs)时,返回的实例将被拦截,并有自己的属性符号被阻塞。 代码如下:
const Human = (function() { const pet = Symbol(); const greet = Symbol(); const Human = privatizeSymbolsInFn(function(name) { this.name = name; // public this[pet] = 'dog'; // private }); Human.prototype = privatizeSymbolsInObj({ [greet]() { // private return 'Hi there!'; }, revealSecrets() { console.log(this[greet]() + ` The pet is a ${this[pet]}`); } }); return Human; })(); const bob = new Human('Bob'); console.assert(bob instanceof Human); console.assert(Reflect.ownKeys(bob).length === 1) // only ['name'] console.assert(Reflect.ownKeys(Human.prototype).length === 1 ) // only ['revealSecrets'] // Setting up the traps inside proxies: function privatizeSymbolsInObj(target) { return new Proxy(target, { ownKeys: Object.getOwnPropertyNames }); } function privatizeSymbolsInFn(Class) { function construct(TargetClass, argsList) { const instance = new TargetClass(...argsList); return privatizeSymbolsInObj(instance); } return new Proxy(Class, { construct }); }
Reflect.ownKeys()是这样工作的:Object.getOwnPropertyNames(myObj).concat(Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(myObj))这就是为什么我们需要为这些对象设置一个陷阱。
另一种方式类似于上两个帖子
class Example {
constructor(foo) {
// privates
const self = this;
this.foo = foo;
// public interface
return self.public;
}
public = {
// empty data
nodata: { data: [] },
// noop
noop: () => {},
}
// everything else private
bar = 10
}
const test = new Example('FOO');
console.log(test.foo); // undefined
console.log(test.noop); // { data: [] }
console.log(test.bar); // undefined
不同的“私人”方式
Instead of fighting against the fact that private visibility is currently unavailable in ES6, I decided to take a more practical approach that does just fine if your IDE supports JSDoc (e.g., Webstorm). The idea is to use the @private tag. As far as development goes, the IDE will prevent you from accessing any private member from outside its class. Works pretty well for me and it's been really useful for hiding internal methods so the auto-complete feature shows me just what the class really meant to expose. Here's an example:
我找到了一个非常简单的解决方案,只需使用Object.freeze()。当然,问题是以后你不能向对象添加任何东西。
class Cat {
constructor(name ,age) {
this.name = name
this.age = age
Object.freeze(this)
}
}
let cat = new Cat('Garfield', 5)
cat.age = 6 // doesn't work, even throws an error in strict mode