是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
当前回答
答案是“不”。但是你可以像这样创建对属性的私有访问:
使用模块。模块中的所有内容都是私有的，除非使用export关键字将其设为公有。 在模块内部，使用函数闭包:http://www.kirupa.com/html5/closures_in_javascript.htm
(可以使用符号来确保隐私的建议在ES6规范的早期版本中是正确的，但现在不再是这样:https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2014-January/035604.html和https://stackoverflow.com/a/22280202/1282216。有关符号和隐私的详细讨论，请参阅:https://curiosity-driven.org/private-properties-in-javascript)
其他回答
我相信在构造函数中使用闭包是可能获得“两全其美”的。有两种变化:
所有数据成员都是私有的
函数myFunc() { console.log(' x的值:' + this.x); this.myPrivateFunc (); ｝ 函数myPrivateFunc() { console.log(' x的增强值:' +(此。X + 1)); ｝ 类测试{ 构造函数(){ Let internal = { X: 2， }; 内部的。myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(内部); 这一点。myFunc = myFunc.bind(内部); ｝ };
有些成员是私有的
注意:这确实很难看。如果您知道更好的解决方案，请编辑此回复。
function myFunc(priv, pub) { pub.y = 3; // The Test object now gets a member 'y' with value 3. console.log('Value of x: ' + priv.x); this.myPrivateFunc(); } function myPrivateFunc() { pub.z = 5; // The Test object now gets a member 'z' with value 3. console.log('Enhanced value of x: ' + (priv.x + 1)); } class Test { constructor() { let self = this; let internal = { x : 2, }; internal.myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(null, internal, self); this.myFunc = myFunc.bind(null, internal, self); } };
不同的“私人”方式
Instead of fighting against the fact that private visibility is currently unavailable in ES6, I decided to take a more practical approach that does just fine if your IDE supports JSDoc (e.g., Webstorm). The idea is to use the @private tag. As far as development goes, the IDE will prevent you from accessing any private member from outside its class. Works pretty well for me and it's been really useful for hiding internal methods so the auto-complete feature shows me just what the class really meant to expose. Here's an example:
另一种方式类似于上两个帖子
class Example {
constructor(foo) {
// privates
const self = this;
this.foo = foo;
// public interface
return self.public;
}
public = {
// empty data
nodata: { data: [] },
// noop
noop: () => {},
}
// everything else private
bar = 10
}
const test = new Example('FOO');
console.log(test.foo); // undefined
console.log(test.noop); // { data: [] }
console.log(test.bar); // undefined
现在大多数浏览器都支持私有类特性。
class Something {
#property;
constructor(){
this.#property = "test";
}
#privateMethod() {
return 'hello world';
}
getPrivateMessage() {
return this.#property;
}
}
const instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> undefined
console.log(instance.privateMethod); //=> undefined
console.log(instance.getPrivateMessage()); //=> test
console.log(instance.#property); //=> Syntax error
完成@d13和@johnny-oshika和@DanyalAytekin的评论:
我想在@johnny-oshika提供的例子中，我们可以使用普通函数而不是箭头函数，然后用当前对象加上_privates对象作为curry形参。
something.js
function _greet(_privates) {
return 'Hello ' + _privates.message;
}
function _updateMessage(_privates, newMessage) {
_privates.message = newMessage;
}
export default class Something {
constructor(message) {
const _privates = {
message
};
this.say = _greet.bind(this, _privates);
this.updateMessage = _updateMessage.bind(this, _privates);
}
}
main.js
import Something from './something.js';
const something = new Something('Sunny day!');
const message1 = something.say();
something.updateMessage('Cloudy day!');
const message2 = something.say();
console.log(message1 === 'Hello Sunny day!'); // true
console.log(message2 === 'Hello Cloudy day!'); // true
// the followings are not public
console.log(something._greet === undefined); // true
console.log(something._privates === undefined); // true
console.log(something._updateMessage === undefined); // true
// another instance which doesn't share the _privates
const something2 = new Something('another Sunny day!');
const message3 = something2.say();
console.log(message3 === 'Hello another Sunny day!'); // true
我能想到的好处:
我们可以有私有方法(_greet和_updateMessage就像私有方法一样，只要我们不导出引用) 尽管它们不在原型上，但上面提到的方法将节省内存，因为实例只在类外部创建一次(而不是在构造函数中定义它们)。 我们不会泄露任何全局变量，因为我们是在一个模块内 我们还可以使用binding _privates对象拥有私有属性
我能想到的一些缺点:
更直观的 混合使用类语法和老式模式(对象绑定、模块/函数作用域变量) 硬绑定——我们不能重新绑定公共方法(尽管我们可以通过使用软绑定来改进这一点(https://github.com/getify/You-Dont-Know-JS/blob/master/this%20%26%20object%20prototypes/ch2.md#softening-binding))。
一个运行的片段可以在这里找到:http://www.webpackbin.com/NJgI5J8lZ
